SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Türk çocuklarında ortodontik tedavi ihtiyacı ve yaşam kalitesi arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi

The examination of relationship between orthodontic treatment need and quality of life in Turkish children

Özkan MİLOĞLU
Oğuzhan ALTUN
Fatma ÇAĞLAYAN
Fatih KAZANCI
Muhammet Dursun KAYA
Pages
8–13
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The results reveal that the averages of total QoL in study group is statistically significant lower than the control group for both questionnaires (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this research is to examine the associated with between orthodontic treatment need and quality of life (QoL) in Turkish children and to stress the association of this relation with some variables such as sociodemographic (age, gender, social class) factors, the level of orthodontic treatment need, frequency of visiting a dentist and treatment will.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Study group was consisted of 178 children who were between ages of 11 and 14, and had orthodontic treatment need.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The results reveal that the averages of total QoL in study group is statistically significant lower than the control group for both questionnaires (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this research is to examine the associated with between orthodontic treatment need and quality of life (QoL) in Turkish children and to stress the association of this relation with some variables such as sociodemographic (age, gender, social class) factors, the level of orthodontic treatment need, frequency of visiting a dentist and treatment will. Material and Methods: Study group was consisted of 178 children who were between ages of 11 and 14, and had orthodontic treatment need. Control group was consisted of 100 children who had no or negligible orthodontic problems. Dental Health Component (DHC) of Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) was based to establish the orthodontic treatment need of every individual. To determine the effect of this need on QoL, shortened 16 items version Child Perception Questionnaire (CPQ11-14) and Child-Oral Impact of Daily Performance (Child-OIDP) index were used. Results: The results reveal that the averages of total QoL in study group is statistically significant lower than the control group for both questionnaires (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı Türk çocuklarında yaşam kalitesi (QoL) ile ortodontik tedavi ihtiyacı arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek ve bu ilişkinin sosyodemografik faktörler (yas, cinsiyet, sosyal sınıf), ortodontik tedavi ihtiyaç seviyesi, diş hekimi ziyaret sıklığı ve tedavi isteği ile olan ilişkisini vurgulamaktır. Materyal ve Metot: Çalışma gurubu ortodontik tedaviye ihtiyaç duyan ve yaşları 11 ile 14 arasında değişen 178 çocuktan, kontrol gurubu ise ortodontik problemi olmayan ya da ihmal edilebilecek seviyede ortodontik problem yaşayan 100 çocuktan oluşmaktaydı. Her bireyin ortodontik tedavi ihtiyacını belirlemek için Ortodontik Tedavi İhtiyaç İndeksinin (IOTN) Diş Sağlıgı Bileşeni (DHC) esas alındı. Yaşam kalitesi üzerine bu ihtiyacın etkisini belirlemek için kısaltılmış 16 maddelik CPQ11-14 anketi ve Child-OIDP indexi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Mevcut araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre çalışma gurubundaki total yaşam kalitesi ortalamaları her iki ankette de kontrol gurubundan istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde daha düşüktür (p

🔖

Cite This Article

MİLOĞLU, Ö., ALTUN, O., ÇAĞLAYAN, F., KAZANCI, F., KAYA, M. D. (2022). Türk çocuklarında ortodontik tedavi ihtiyacı ve yaşam kalitesi arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 8–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/452661

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Inglehart MR, Bagramian RA.,editors. Oral Healthrelated Quality of Life. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 2002. pp. 111–21
  2. Fernandes MJ, Ruta DA, Ogden GR, Pitts NB, Ogston SA. Assessing oral health-related quality of life in general dental practice in Scotland: validation of the OHIP-14. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2006;34:53-62
  3. Hegarty AM, McGrath C, Hodsgon TA, Porter SR. Patient-centred outcome measures in oral medicine: are they valid and reliable? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:670-4
  4. Holman H, Lorig K. Patients as partners in managing chronic disease. Partnership is a prerequisite for effective and efficient health care. BMJ 2000;320:526-7
  5. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:309-20
  6. Jokovic A, Locker D, Stephens M, Kenny D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring child oral-health-related quality of life. J Dent Res 2002;81:459-63
  7. Jokovic A, Locker D, Guyatt G. Short forms of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire for 11-14-year-old children (CPQ11-14): development and initial evaluation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;19:4:4
  8. Gherunpong S, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. Developing and evaluating an oral health-related quality of life index for children; the CHILD-OIDP. Community Dent Health 2004;21:161-9
  9. Pal D. Quality of life assessment in children: a review of conceptual and methodological issues in multidimensional health status measures. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996;50: 391-6. 10. de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A. Orthodontic treatment and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in Brazilian adolescents. J Orthod 2004;31:20-7
  10. Kerosuo H, Hausen H, Laine T, Shaw WC. The influence of incisal malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:505-12
  11. Zhou YH, Hagg U, Rabie AB. Severity of dentofacial deformity, the motivations and the outcome of surgery in skeletal Class III patients. Chin Med J 2002;115:1031-4
  12. Helm S, Kreiborg S, Solow B. Psychosocial implications of malocclusion: a 15-year follow-up study in 30-year-old Danes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1985;87:110-8
  13. Hawker DS, Boulton MJ. Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychological maladjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross sectional studies. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2000;41:441-55
  14. Marques LS, Ramos-Jorge ML, Paiva SM, Pordeus IA. Malocclusion: esth