Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirilen hipofiz kalsifikasyonlarının Türk subpopülasyonundaki sıklığı

Prevalence of pituitary calcifications using cone beam computed tomography in Turkish subpopulation

Pages
289–292
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, the low percentage shouldbe considered in the differential diagnosis of calcifyingtumors in the sella region and during pre-surgicalplanning related to the pituitary gland.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The objective of this study was toinvestigate the prevalence of pituitary calcificationsusing cone beam computed tomography in a group ofTurkish individuals.Material and methods: Cone beam computedtomography scans in the axial, coronal and sagittalplanes of the pituitary gland of 284 patients wereexamined for evidence of pituitary calcification.Results: In the cone beam computed tomographyscans, pituitary calcifications were seen 0.7% of thesample.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All of the pituitary calcifications wereobserved in males.Conclusion: This study showed a low frequency ofpituitary calcification.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, the low percentage shouldbe considered in the differential diagnosis of calcifyingtumors in the sella region and during pre-surgicalplanning related to the pituitary gland.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was toinvestigate the prevalence of pituitary calcificationsusing cone beam computed tomography in a group ofTurkish individuals.Material and methods: Cone beam computedtomography scans in the axial, coronal and sagittalplanes of the pituitary gland of 284 patients wereexamined for evidence of pituitary calcification.Results: In the cone beam computed tomographyscans, pituitary calcifications were seen 0.7% of thesample. All of the pituitary calcifications wereobserved in males.Conclusion: This study showed a low frequency ofpituitary calcification. Thus, the low percentage shouldbe considered in the differential diagnosis of calcifyingtumors in the sella region and during pre-surgicalplanning related to the pituitary gland.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı konik ışınlı bilgisayarlıtomografi ile hipofiz kalsifikasyonlarının Türk subpopülasyonundaki sıklığını araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: 284 hastanın hipofiz bezine aitaksiyel, koronal ve sagittal düzlemde konik ışınlıbilgisayarlı tomografi ile yapılan taramaları, pituiter kalsifikasyonların varlığı açısından incelendi.Bulgular: Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile yapılan taramalarda pituiter kalsifikasyonlar % 0.7 oranında görüldü. Pituiter kalsifikasyonların tümü erkeklerde gözlendi. Sonuç: Bu çalışmada hipofiz kalsifikasyona ait düşükbir oran bulundu. Bu düşük oran sella bölgesindekikalsifiye olan tümörlerin ayırıcı tanısında ve pituiter bezle ilgili cerrahi öncesi planlamada dikkate alınmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜMBÜLLÜ, M. A., ÇAĞLAYAN, F., ÇAKUR, B. (2022). Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirilen hipofiz kalsifikasyonlarının Türk subpopülasyonundaki sıklığı. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 289–292. https://ajindex.com/articles/452415

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Sam S, Molitch ME. The Pituitary Mass: Diagnosis and Management. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2005;6:55-62.
  2. Freda PU, Wardlaw SL, Post KD. Unusual causes of sellar/parasellar masses in a large transsphenoidal surgical series. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81:3455–9.
  3. Kasliwal MK, Sharma BS. A rare case of pituitary adenoma with calcification: a case report. Turk Neurosurg 2008;18:232-5.
  4. Eldevik OP, Blaivas M, Gabrielsen TO, Hald JK, Chandler WF. Craniopharyngioma: radiologic and histologic findings and recurrence. Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17:1427–39.
  5. Horiuchi T, Tanaka Y, Kobayashi S, Yokoh A, Unoki T. Total capsular calcification in a prolactinoma. Case report. Neurol Med Chir 1996;36:729–32. Makariou E,Patsalides AD. Intracranial calcifications. Appl Radiol 2009;38:48-50.
  6. Kinoshita Y, Yasukouchi H, Tsuru E, Yamaguch R. Case report of Rosai-Dorfman disease mimicking pachymeningitis. No Shinkei Geka 2004;32:1051-6.
  7. Tamaki T, Takumi I, Kitamura T, et al. Pituitary stone - case report. Neurol Med Chir 2000;40:383-6.
  8. Ho DM, Liu HC. Prolactin-containing pituitary adenomas. Their characteristics and comparative study with non-prolactin adenomas. Pathol Res Pract 1992;188:296-302.
  9. Ozonoff MB, Burrows EH. Radiology of the skull and brain. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1971. p. 823-73. Burrows EH. Pathologic intracranial calcification: Neoplasms. In:Newton TH, Potts DG (eds). Radiology of the skull and brain, Vol.1. Book 2, The Skull. St Louis; CV Mosby: 1971. p. 848-73.
  10. Soule SG, Jacobs HS. The evaluation and management of subclinical pituitary disease. Postgrad Med J 1996;72:258-62.
  11. Nakasu Y, Nakasu S, NakajimaM, Itoh R, Matsuda M. Atypical rathke’s cleft cyst associated with ossification. Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1287–9.
  12. Lundin P, Bergstrom K, Thuomas KA, Lundberg PO, Muhr C. Comparison of MR imaging and CT in pituitary macroadenomas. Acta Radiol 1991;32:189–96.
  13. Connor SE, Penney CC. MRI in the differential diagnosis of a sellar mass. Clin Radiol 2003;58:20–31.
  14. Naidich MJ, Russell EJ. Current approaches to imaging of the sellar region and pituitary. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1999;28:45–79.
  15. Zahariadis G, Kontogeorgos G, Liberopoulos K, George S, Kovacs K. Ossifying pituitary gonadotroph adenoma: A case report. Acta Neurochir 1999;141:1001-3.
  16. Cotran SR, Kumar V, Robbins SL. Robins pathologic basis of disease. 4nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1989. p. 33-4. 19. Kato T, Kuwayama A, Takahashi T, Kageyama N. Calcification in pituitary adenomas. Neurol Med Chir 1983;23:633-7. We