Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DISTANCE OF MIDLINE MOVING IN CANINE- GUIDED OCCLUSION

TEMPOROMANDİBULAR RAHATSIZLIKLARIN İŞARET VE SEMPTOMLARI VE KANİN KORUYUCULU OKLÜZYONDA ORTA HAT KAYMA MESAFESİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ

Pages
386–390
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The values were subjected to a paired t-test, and the P value was statistically insignificant mandibular joints) clicking at the start was the only significant predictor (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study was done with the objective of determining the distance of movement between the maxillary and mandibular midline (DMM) and its relationship with the signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in canine-guided occlusion and to compare the obtained values between the right and left sides.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The percentages of signs and symptoms were compared using the chi-square test to determine the differences among the groups for the rates of TMD symptoms, bruxism, joint sounds and unilateral chewing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The values were subjected to a paired t-test, and the P value was statistically insignificant mandibular joints) clicking at the start was the only significant predictor (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study was done with the objective of determining the distance of movement between the maxillary and mandibular midline (DMM) and its relationship with the signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in canine-guided occlusion and to compare the obtained values between the right and left sides. Materials and Methods: One hundred females showing canine-guided occlusion and Angle's class I canine and molar relation were chosen for the study. The maxillary midline’s corresponding line was marked on the mandible with a marker pen in the patient's mouth, both during maximum intercuspation and at the edges of maxillary and mandibular canine contact. DMM was considered as the distance between the two lines (measured using a digital caliper). The percentages of signs and symptoms were compared using the chi-square test to determine the differences among the groups for the rates of TMD symptoms, bruxism, joint sounds and unilateral chewing. Results: The mean value of the DMM for all subjects was found to be 3.61 mm on the right side and 3.64 mm on the left side. The values were subjected to a paired t-test, and the P value was statistically insignificant mandibular joints) clicking at the start was the only significant predictor (P

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma, bireylerde kanin koruyuculu oklüzyonda, maksiller ve mandibular orta hat arasındaki kayma miktarını(DMM) ve temporomandibular rahatsızlıkların(TMD) işaret ve semptomları ile ilişkisini belirlemek ve sağ ve sol taraftan elde edilen değerleri karşılaştırmak için yapıldı. Gereç ve yöntem: Bu çalışma için, kanin koruyuculu oklüzyonu, Angle sınıf I kanin ve molar ilişkisi olan, yüz bayan seçildi. Bireyin ağzında hem maksimum interküspidasyonda hem de maksiller ve mandibular kaninlerin vestibül tepeleri temasta olduğu zaman, işaret kalemi ile maksiller orta hattın mandibulada tekabül ettiği çizgi işaretlendi. DMM, bu iki çizgi arası mesafe olarak sayıldı (dijital kumpas kullanılarak ölçüldü). İşaret ve semptomların yüzdesi, TMD semptomları, bruksizm, eklem sesleri ve tek taraflı çiğneme oranları için gruplar arasındaki farklılıkları belirlemek karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Bütün bireyler için, DMM ortalama değeri, sağ tarafta 3.61mm, sol tarafta 3.64mm olarak bulundu. Değerler paired t-testine tabi kılındı ve Pdeğeri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi(P>0.05).TMD semptomları(çenede ağrı)ve bruksizm için tek anlamlı öngörücü, başlangıçta rapor edilen TMJ klik sesi idi(P

🔖

Cite This Article

ALADAĞ, L. İ., KUL, D. E. (2022). SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DISTANCE OF MIDLINE MOVING IN CANINE- GUIDED OCCLUSION. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 386–390. https://ajindex.com/articles/452306

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Celic, R., Jerolimov, V., and Knezovic Zlataric, D. 2004. Relationship of slightly limited mandibular movements to temporomandibular disorders. Brazilian Dent J 2004; 15:151-4
  2. Koolstra, J.H. 2002. Dynamics of the human masticatory system. Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine: an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists 13:366-76
  3. Okeson, J.P. menagement of temporomandıbular disorders and occlusıon 7 ed. Missouri
  4. Narang P, Shetty S, Prasad, KD. An in vivo study to determine the range of posterior teeth disclusion on working side in canine-guided occlusion. Indian journal of dental research: official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research 2012; 23:814- 8
  5. Gibbs CH, M T, Reswick JB, Derda HJ. Functional movements of the mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 604-20
  6. Levin A. Electrognathographics: atlas of diagnostic procedures and interpretation. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing 1985
  7. Michalak M, Wysokinska-Miszczuk J, Wilczak M, Paulo M, Bozyk A, Borowicz J. Correlation between eye and ear symptoms and lack of teeth, bruxism and other parafunctions in a population of 1006 patients in 2003-2008. Archives of medical science: AMS 2012; 8:104-10
  8. Koeck B GG, Hupfauf L et al. Maślanka T (ed.). Urban&Partner, Wrocław 1997. Funcional disorders of the masticatory system [Polish]
  9. Kleinrok M. On the harmful effects and the need of treating masticatory system dysfunctions [Polish]. Zdrowie Publiczne 1991; 4:152-8
  10. Van Eijden, T.M. 2000. Biomechanics of the mandible. Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine: an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists 11:123-36
  11. Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM. Three-dimensional dynamical capabilities of the human masticatory muscles. Journal of biomechanics 1999; 32:145- 52
  12. Barbosa Tde S, Miyakoda LS, Pocztaruk Rde L, Rocha CP, Gaviao MB. Temporomandibular disorders and bruxism in childhood and adolescence: review of the literature. International J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2008; 72:299-314
  13. Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM. The jaw open-close movements predicted by biomechanical modelling. Journal of biomechanics 1997; 30:943-50. 14.Yılmaz AB,Yeşil Duymuş Z. Tme düzensizlikleri semptomlarına diş hekimliği fakültesi öğrencileri arasında rastlanma sıklığı ile cinsiyet, maloklüzyon ve parafonksiyonel alışkanlıkların ilişkisinin tesbit edilmesi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2002; 12: 14-9.