SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE OF SELF-ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS USED FOR FIBER POST CEMENTATION

FİBER POST SİMANTASYONUNDA KULLANILAN SELF-ADEZİV REZİN SİMANLARIN MİKROSIZINTILARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Hayal BOYACIOĞLU
L Şebnem TÜRKÜN
Gamze YILDIRIM
Pages
191–198
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The data was analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey tests (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of four self-adhesive resin cements used for fiber post cementation with fluid filtration method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: In the study, 50 upper human canine teeth extracted for periodontal reasons were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The data was analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey tests (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of four self-adhesive resin cements used for fiber post cementation with fluid filtration method. Material and Method: In the study, 50 upper human canine teeth extracted for periodontal reasons were used. The root lengths of the teeth were mesured and standardized. Root canals were enlarged with rotary instruments (Protaper, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaquies, Switzerland) and filling was achieved using lateral compaction technique. The specimens were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=10). The fiber post (Exacto Glass Fiber posts, Angelus Industria de Produtos Odontologicos S/A, Londrina-PR-Brasil) cementations are completed with the fallowing materials: Variolink II Professional Pack (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) (Control), G-Cem Automix (GC, Tokyo, Japan), Panavia SA Cement (Kuraray, Okayama, Japan), Smart Cem 2 (Dentsply DeTrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany) and Rely X U200 (3M ESPE, Neuss, Germany). The measurement of microleakage was performed at 2nd, 4th, 6th and 8th minutes. The data was analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey tests (p

Özet

Amaç: simantasyonunda kullanılan dört self-adeziv rezin simanın mikrosızıntılarını sıvı filtrasyon yöntemi ile karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada, periodontal nedenlerle çekilmiş 50 adet insan üst çene kanin dişi kullanıldı. Dişlerin kök boyları ölçülerek standardize edildi. Dişler döner eğelerle (Protaper, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaquies, İsviçre) genişletilip, lateral kompaksiyon yöntemiyle dolduruldu. Örnekler rastgele 5 gruba ayrıldı (n=10). Fiber post (Exacto Glass Fiber posts, Angelus Industria de Produtos Odontologicos S/A, Londrina-PR-Brezilya) simantasyonları şu materyallerle yapıldı: Variolink II Professional Pack (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) (Kontrol), G-Cem Automix (GC, Tokyo, Japonya), Panavia SA Cement (Kuraray, Okayama, Japonya), Smart Cem 2 (Dentsply DeTrey GmbH, Konstanz, Almanya) ve Rely X U200 (3M ESPE, Neuss, Almanya). Mikrosızıntı ölçümleri 2, 4, 6 ve 8. dakikalarda gerçekleştirildi. Veriler istatistiksel olarak ANOVA ve Tukey testleri ile değerlendirildi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BOYACIOĞLU, H., TÜRKÜN, L. Ş., YILDIRIM, G. (2022). COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE OF SELF-ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS USED FOR FIBER POST CEMENTATION. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 191–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/452285

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J. 1995;28:12-8
  2. Madison S, Swanson K, Chiles SA. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part II. Sealer types. J Endod. 1987;13:109- 12
  3. Smith CT, Schuman NS. Prefabricated post and core systems: An overview. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 1998;19:1013-8
  4. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Apr;89:360-7
  5. Barjau-Escribano A, Sancho-Bru JL, Forner-Navarro L, Rodríguez-Cervantes PJ, Pérez-Gonzáles A, Sánchez-Marin FT. Influence of prefabricated post material on restored teeth: Fracture strength and stress distribution. Oper Dent 2006;3: 47-54
  6. Schwartz RS. Adhesive dentistry and endodontics. Part 2: bonding in the root canal system - the promise and the problems: a review. J Endod. 2006;32:1125-34
  7. Pedreira APRV, Pegoraro LF, Góes MF, Pegoraro TA, Carvalho RM. Microhardness of resin cements in the intraradicular environment: effects of water storage and softening treatment. Dent Mater 2009;25:868-76
  8. Duarte S Jr, Botta AC, Meire M, Sadan A. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and selfetch resin cements to intact and etched enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:203-10
  9. Akgungor G, Akkayan B. Influence of dentin bonding agents and polymerization modes on the bond strength between translucent fibre posts and three dentin regions within a post space. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:368-78
  10. Monticelli F, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Cement system and surface treatment selection for fiber post luting. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008; 13:214-21
  11. Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Rosentritt M, Beuer F, Meyer-Lückel H, Frankenberger R. Self-adhesive cements as core build-ups for one-stage postendodontic restorations? Int Endod J 2011; 44:195-202
  12. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:2518
  13. Çilingir ÇA, Gömeç Y. Self-adesif reçine simanlar. İst Üniv Diş Hek Fak Dergisi 2008;42:31-40
  14. Viotti RG, Kasaz A, Pena CE, Alexandre RS, Arrais CA, Reis AF. Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:306- 12