SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of the viscosity properties of two oral moisturising gels. (Oralbalance® ve Bioxtra®)

Ağız içi nemlendirici özelleri olan iki jelin (oralbalance® ve bioxtra®) viskozite özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi

Hayal BOYACIOĞLU
Pelin GÜNERİ
Esra BALOĞLU
Yaprak Sinem KARAVANA
Esin ALPÖZ
Pages
29–34
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, measurements made at 37ºC showed that Bioxtra® has the lowest viscosity value (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study was to compare the viscosity properties of two oral moisturising gels.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The viscosity measurements of the gels were performed with Brookfield digital viscosimeter (Model DV-III) at room temperature and at 37ºC to mimic the body temperature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, measurements made at 37ºC showed that Bioxtra® has the lowest viscosity value (p
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the viscosity properties of two oral moisturising gels. The viscosity measurements of the gels were performed with Brookfield digital viscosimeter (Model DV-III) at room temperature and at 37ºC to mimic the body temperature. The viscosities of natural saliva collected from 5 healthy people and the two oral moisturising gels were measured under the same conditions. Ten different measurements were made from each formulation to determine the mean viscosity values. Measurements obtained at the room temperature showed that both formulations have similar viscosity values. However, measurements made at 37ºC showed that Bioxtra® has the lowest viscosity value (p

Özet

Çalışmada ağız içi nemlendirici özelliği olan iki farklı jelin viskozite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi ve doğal tükürükle karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Jellerin ve doğal tükürüğün viskozite ölçümleri Brookfield dijital viskozimetre cihazı (Model DV-III) kullanılarak oda sıcaklığında ve vücut ısısında (37ºC’ de) gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sağlıklı 5 kişiden toplanan tükürük örneklerinin viskozite ölçümleri de yapay tükürük preparatlarıyla aynı şartlarda gerçekleştirilmiş ve her bir örnekten 10 ölçüm yapılarak ortalama viskozite değerleri elde edilmiştir. Oda sıcaklığında yapılan ölçümlerde jellerin viskozite özelliklerinin birbirine benzediği, ancak 37ºC’de BioXtra®’nın istatistiksel olarak daha düşük viskoziteye sahip olduğu gözlenmiştir (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BOYACIOĞLU, H., GÜNERİ, P., BALOĞLU, E., KARAVANA, Y. S., ALPÖZ, E. (2022). Evaluation of the viscosity properties of two oral moisturising gels. (Oralbalance® ve Bioxtra®). Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 29–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/452716

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Pederson AM, Bardow A, Jensen SB, Nauntofte B. Saliva and gastrointestinal functions of taste, mastication, swallowing and digestion. Oral Diseases 2002; 8:117-129
  2. Chiappin S, Antonelli G, Gatti R, De Palo EF. Saliva specimen: A new laboratory tool for diagnostic and basic investigation. Clinica Chimica Acta 2007; 383:30-40
  3. Atkinson JC, Grisius M, Massey W. Salivary hypofunction and xerostomia:Diagnosis and treatment. Dent Clin N Am 2005; 49:309-326
  4. Christersson CE, Lindh L, Arnebrant T. Filmforming properties and viscosities of saliva substitutes and human whole saliva. Eur J Oral Sciences 2000; 108: 418-425
  5. Narhi TO, Meurman JH, Ainamo A. Xerostomia and Hyposalivation. Drugs and Aging 1999;15:103-116
  6. Puy CL. The role of saliva in maintaining oral health and as an aid to diagnosis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006; 11:449-455
  7. Ship JA. Diagnosing, managing, and preventing salivary gland disorders. Oral Diseases Tsifetaki N, Kitsos G, Paschides CA, Alamanos Y, Eftaxias V, Voulgari PV, Psilas K, Drosos AA. Oral pilocarpine for the treatment of ocular symptoms in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. Randomised 12 week controlled study. Annals of the Rheumatic diseases 2003; 62:1204-1207
  8. Helenius LMJ, Meurman JH, Helenius I, Kar% K, Hietanen aj, Suuronen R, Hallikainen D, Kautianen H, Leirisalo-Repo M, Lindqvist C. Oral and salivary parameters in patients with rheumatic diseases.Acta Odontol Scand 2005; 63: 284-293
  9. Alpöz E, Güneri P, Önder G, Çankaya H, Kabasakal Y, Kose T. The efficacy of Xialine((R)) in patients with Sjögren's syndrome: a singleblind, cross-over study. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12: 165-72
  10. Samarawickrama DYD. Saliva substitutes: how effective and safe are they? Oral Diseases 2002:8; 177-179
  11. Tenovuo J. Clinical applications of antimicrobial host proteins lactoperoxidase, lysozyme and lactoferrin in xerostomia and safety. Oral Diseases 2002; 8: 23-29
  12. Kelly HM, Deasy PB, Busquet M, Torrance AA. Bioadhesive, rheological, lubricant and other aspects of an oral gel formulation intended fort he treatment of xerostomia. Int J Pharm 2004: 278;391-406
  13. Bergdahl M. Salivary flow and oral complaints in adult patients. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000; 28: 59-66
  14. Alves MB, Motta CF, Messina MS, Migliari DA. Saliva substitute in xerostomic patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome:A single-blind trial. Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 392-396
  15. Khurshudian AV. Apilot study to test the efficacy of oral