Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE OF DENTISTS IN EVALUATION OF ANATOMIC LANDMARKS ON PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY

DİŞ HEKİMLERİNİN PANORAMİK RADYOGRAFİDE ANATOMİK LANDMARKLARI DEĞERLENDİRMEDEKİ BİLGİ DÜZEYLERİ

Pages
160–164
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Dentists are required to take measurements for keeping dental information fresh throughout the dentist’s professional life

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the level of knowledge of dentists in the evaluation of anatomic landmarks on panoramic radiography.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 53 dentists working in public dental hospitals, universities, and private practice were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Dentists are required to take measurements for keeping dental information fresh throughout the dentist’s professional life
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the level of knowledge of dentists in the evaluation of anatomic landmarks on panoramic radiography. Materials and Methods: A total of 53 dentists working in public dental hospitals, universities, and private practice were included in this study. The dentists’ level of knowledge related to anatomical landmarks was determined according to whether correct answers were given to the anatomical locations on panoramic radiographs. The relationship between the rate of correct answers and factors, including age, gender, experiences, profession, and working institutions, were statistically determined via the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in the number of correct answers of 53 dentists (25 females and 28 males, mean age 33.5±8.7) with respect to the age and experience subgroups (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the gender, working institution, and experience subgroups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Dentists are required to take measurements for keeping dental information fresh throughout the dentist’s professional life

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, panoramik radyografideki anatomik hekimlerinin bilgi düzeylerinin belirlenmesiydi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kamu, üniversitesi ve özel polikliniklerde çalışan 53 diş hekimini çalışmamıza dahil edilmiştir. Panoramik radyografideki anatomik yerlerin doğru verilip verilmediğinin cevaplanmasına göre diş hekimlerinin anatomik oluşumlarla ilgili bilgi düzeyleri belirlendi. Doğru cevap verme oranları ile yaş, cinsiyet, mesleki tecrübe, çalıştığı kurum ve uzmanlık alanı gibi faktörler arasındaki ilişki Mann Whitney U ve Kruskal Wallis belirlenmiştir. P

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSU, Ç., AKTAN, A. M., ÇİFTÇİ, M. E., İŞMAN, Ö., KUNDAKOĞLU, Z. (2022). LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE OF DENTISTS IN EVALUATION OF ANATOMIC LANDMARKS ON PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 160–164. https://ajindex.com/articles/452199

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Perschbacher S. Interpretation of panoramic radiographs. Aust Dent J 2012;57 Suppl 1:40-5
  2. Joo JK, Lim YJ, Kwon HB, Ahn SJ. Panoramic radiographic evaluation of the mandibular morphological changes in elderly dentate and edentulous subjects. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71:357-62
  3. Miloglu O, Yasa Y, Bayrakdar IS, Gungor H. Panoramic radiographic examination in a group of edentulous patients Atatürk Üniv Dis Hek Fak Derg 2012;22:230-4 4. Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. Routine panoramic radiography of new adult patients in general dental practice: relevance of diagnostic yield to treatment and identification of radiographic selection criteria. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:488-95
  4. Neumann C, Yung J, Carroll PH. Mastoid surgery under local anesthesia for medically unfit patients: techniques and outcome. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2013;122:613-8
  5. Zhou JY, Lu JH, Zhen XY, Wang W, Xu JF, Hu WW. Microsurgical anatomical study of the frontotemporal-zygomatic arch approach to the superior petroclival region. Exp Ther Med 2011;2:1211-4.