Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

COMPARISON OF THE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND DISCOMFORT AFTER DIODE LASER AND CONVENTIONAL FRENECTOMY

KONVANSİYONEL VE DİYOT LAZER YÖNTEMLERİ İLE YAPILAN FRENEKTOMİ İŞLEMİ SONRASI AĞRI VE HASTA KONFORUNUN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Pages
57–62
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Pain was found to be significantly higher in conventional group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Frenulum is a sagittal fibrous fold of oral mucosa with a periosteal insertion that extends from the lip or cheek to the alveolar or gingival mucosa.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material-method: In this study, in totally 74 patients frenectomy procedure was indicated. 39 patients had frenectomy performed with conventional surgery (Group C) and 35 patients had frenectomy performed with laser surgery (Group L).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pain was found to be significantly higher in conventional group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Frenulum is a sagittal fibrous fold of oral mucosa with a periosteal insertion that extends from the lip or cheek to the alveolar or gingival mucosa. Sometimes frenulums have high attachments and wide soft tissue folds and these high frenulums may cause functional and aesthetic problems. The aim of this study is evaluate the pain and discomfort in patients treated with conventional or diode laser frenectomy through VAS scale. Material-method: In this study, in totally 74 patients frenectomy procedure was indicated. 39 patients had frenectomy performed with conventional surgery (Group C) and 35 patients had frenectomy performed with laser surgery (Group L). None of the patients had systemic disease or any prescribed drug use. A VAS scale was prepared in order to evaluate pain and discomfort in speaking and chewing. All patients were informed about how to fill the form in detail and a form was given to each patient. All patients were recalled at 10th day and VAS scale forms were recollected. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic data of the groups (p>0.05). Pain was found to be significantly higher in conventional group (p

Özet

Amaç: Frenilum dudak ve yanaklardan ağız mukozası veya yapışık dişetine uzanan, periosta tutunan kas ve bağ dokusu liflerinden oluşan fizyolojik-anatomik bir bağlantıdır. Bazı hastalarda frenilum yüksek seviyede ataçman ve geniş mukoza katlantıları yaparak fonksiyonel ve/veya estetik problemlere neden olabilir. Bu gibi durumlarda cerrahi olarak alınması gereklidir. Frenektomi konvansiyonel olarak uygulandığında sütür gerektirir ve sonrasında kanama, şişlik ve ağrı olabilir. Lazer uygulaması, kanama olmaması, sütür gerektirmemesi ve hasta konforu açısından tercih edilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı konvansiyonel ve diyot lazer cerrahisi ile yapılan frenektomi işlemi sonrasında VAS skalası aracılığıyla ağrı, konuşma ve çiğneme güçlüğünün değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Frenektomi endikasyonu konulmuş toplam 74 hastada 39 hastaya konvansiyonel cerrahi (K grubu) uygulanmış, 35 hastaya ise diyot lazer cerrahisi (L grubu) ile frenektomi uygulanmıştır. Dahil edilen hastalar sistemik hastalığı olmayan, düzenli ilaç kullanmayan hastalardı. Ağrı, çiğneme ve konuşma fonksiyonlarının değerlendirilebilmesi için hazırlanan VAS skalası formu hastalara verilerek nasıl doldurmaları gerektiği detaylı bir biçimde anlatılmıştır. Hastalar işlem sonrası 10. günde kontrole çağırılmıştır. Bulgular: Her iki grup arasında yaş ve cinsiyet dağılı- mı açısından fark bulunmadı (p>0.05). Ağrı konvansi- yonel grupta lazer gurubuna oranla anlamlı düzeyde yüksek bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KARATAŞ, D. Ö., TULU, D. F., FATMA, F., YÜCE, H. B. (2022). COMPARISON OF THE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND DISCOMFORT AFTER DIODE LASER AND CONVENTIONAL FRENECTOMY. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 57–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/452089

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Devishree, Gujjari SK, Shubhashini PV. Frenectomy: a review with the reports of surgical techniques. Journal Of Clinical And Diagnostic Research: JCDR 2012;6:1587-92
  2. Delli K, Livas C, Sculean A, Katsaros C, Bornstein MM. Facts and myths regarding the maxillary midline frenum and its treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Quintessence Int 2013;44:177-87
  3. Gargari M, Autili N, Petrone A, Prete V. Using the diode laser in the lower labial frenum removal. ORAL & Implantology 2012;5:54-7
  4. Akpinar A, Toker H, Lektemur Alpan A, Calisir M. Postoperative Discomfort After Nd: YAG laser and conventional frenectomy: comparison of both genders. Australian Dental Journal 2015
  5. Haytac MC, Ozcelik O. Evaluation of patient perceptions after frenectomy operations: a comparison of carbon dioxide laser and scalpel techniques. J Periodontology 2006; 77: 1815-9
  6. Shetty K, Trajtenberg C, Patel C, Streckfus C. Maxillary frenectomy using a carbon dioxide laser in a pediatric patient: a case report. General Dentistry 2008;56:60-3
  7. Pie-Sanchez J, Espana-Tost AJ, ArnabatDominguez J, Gay-Escoda C. Comparative study of upper lip frenectomy with the CO2 laser versus the Er, Cr:YSGG laser. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal 2012;17:e228-32
  8. De Santis D, Gerosa R, Graziani PF, et al. Lingual frenectomy: a comparison between the conventional surgical and laser procedure. Minerva Stomatologica 2013
  9. Romanos G. Current concepts in the use of lasers in periodontal and implant dentistry. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology 2015;19:490-494
  10. Kafas P, Stavrianos C, Jerjes W, et al. Upper-lip laser frenectomy without infiltrated anaesthesia in a paediatric patient: a case report. Cases J 2009; 2:7138
  11. Ishikawa I, Aoki A, Takasaki AA. Clinical application of erbium:YAG laser in periodontology. Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology 2008;10:22-30
  12. Aras MH, Goregen M, Gungormus M, Akgul HM. Comparison of diode laser and Er:YAG lasers in the treatment of ankyloglossia. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery 2010;28:173-7
  13. Goharkhay K, Moritz A, Wilder-Smith P, et al. Effects on oral soft tissue produced by a diode laser in vitro. Lasers İn Surgery And Medicine 1999;25:401-6
  14. Vivek V, Jayasree RS, Balan A, Sreelatha KT, Gupta AK. Three-year follow-up of oral leukoplakia after neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser surgery. Lasers in Medical Science 2008;23:375-9. 15. van der Hem PS, Egges M, van der Wal JE,