Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

THE EFFECT OF STORAGE TIMES ON THE HARDNESS AND WATER SORPTION IN SILICONE-BASED SOFT LINING MATERIALS

SİLİKON ESASLI YUMUŞAK ASTAR MATERYALLERİNDE BEKLETME SÜRELERİNİN SERTLİK VE SU EMİLİMİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Pages
469–474
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Regarding the hardness, a statistically significant difference was obtained among all Permaflex and Permaflex+isobutylmethacrylate groups when comparing all time periods (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of the storage times of silicone-based soft lining material in water on hardness and water absorption of the material.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The soft denture liners were processed according to manufacturers’ instructions with the dimension (10x10x1mm) for water sorption tests and (10x10mm) for hardness tests, and then put in water bath at 37 0C.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Regarding the hardness, a statistically significant difference was obtained among all Permaflex and Permaflex+isobutylmethacrylate groups when comparing all time periods (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of the storage times of silicone-based soft lining material in water on hardness and water absorption of the material. Material and methods: In this study, silicone based soft denture liner Permaflex and isobutylmethacrylateadded form of the same material were used. The soft denture liners were processed according to manufacturers’ instructions with the dimension (10x10x1mm) for water sorption tests and (10x10mm) for hardness tests, and then put in water bath at 37 0C. During the periods of 1st day, 1st week, 1, 3 and 6 months, the measurements of water absorption and Shore A hardness values were performed. Data were evaluated using Man Whıtney U, Friedman and Wilcoxon tests (α=0.05). Results: Regarding the hardness, a statistically significant difference was obtained among all Permaflex and Permaflex+isobutylmethacrylate groups when comparing all time periods (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, silikon esaslı yumuşakastar materyalinin su içerisinde bekletme sürelerininmaddenin sertliği ve su emilimi üzerine etkisiniaraştırmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada silikon esaslı yumuşakastar maddesi Permaflex ve aynı maddenin izobutilmetakrilatlikit ilave edilmiş formu kullanıldı. Yumuşakastar materyalleri üretici talimatlarına uygun olarak suemilimi testleri için (10x10x1mm) boyutlarında, sertliktestleri için ise (10x10mm) boyutlarında hazırlandı ve37 0C’lik su banyosu içerisinde bekletildi. 1. gün, 1.hafta, 1,3 ve 6 aylık süre zarflarında su emilim veShore A sertlik değerleri ölçümleri gerçekleştirildi.Veriler Man Whitney U testi, Friedman testi veWilcoxon testi kullanılarak belirlendi (α=0.05).Bulgular: Sertlik değerleri bakımından, Permaflex vePermaflex+izobutilmetakrilat grupları arasında tüm zamandilimleri kıyaslandığında istatistiksel olarak anlamlıfark tespit edilmiştir (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TUĞUT, F., AKAR, T., COŞKUN, M. E. (2022). THE EFFECT OF STORAGE TIMES ON THE HARDNESS AND WATER SORPTION IN SILICONE-BASED SOFT LINING MATERIALS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 469–474. https://ajindex.com/articles/451897

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. McCabe JF, Carrick TE, Kamohara H. Adhesive Bond Strength and Compliance for Denture Soft Lining Materials. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 1347–52.
  2. Machado AL, Breeding LC, Puckett AD. Effect of Microwave Disinfection on The Hardness and Adhesion of Two Resilient Liners. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 183-9.
  3. Akşit KS, Mandalı G, Gürbüz Ö. Protetik Tedavide Bir Yumuşak Astar Maddesi; Molloplast-B. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak. Derg. 2012; 5: 113-22.
  4. Leon BLT, Del Bel Cury AA, Rodrigues Garcia RC. Water Sorption, Solubility, and Tensile Bond Strength of Resilient Denture Lining Materials Polymerized By Different Methods After Thermal Cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 282-7.
  5. Braden M, Wright PS. Water Absorption and Water Solubility of Soft Lining Materials for Acrylic Dentures. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 764-8.
  6. Murata H, Taguchi N, Hamada T, McCabe JF. Dynamic Viscoelastic Properties and The Age Changes of Long-Term Soft Denture Liners. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1421-7. Yanıkoğlu N. Yumuşak Astar Maddeleri ve Özellikleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2004; 14: 55-64.
  7. Pavan S, Filho JNA, Santos PH, Nogueira SS, Batista AUD. Effect of Disinfection Treatments on the Hardness of Soft Denture Liner Materials. J Prosthodont 2007; 16: 101-6.
  8. Craig RG, Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental Materials, Properties and Manipulation. 11th ed. St. Louis; Mosby: 2002. p. 668. Parker S, Braden M. Water Absorption of Methacrylate Soft Lining Materials. Biomaterials 1989; 10: 91-5.
  9. Tugut F, Akin H, Mutaf B, Akin GE, Ozdemir AK. Strength of The Bond Between A Silicone Lining Material and Denture Resin After Er:YAG Laser Treatments with Different Pulse Durations and Levels of Energy. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 281-5.
  10. Bolayır G, Demir H, Doğan A, Boztuğ A, Doğan OM, Soygun K. Effects of Different High Alkyl Methacrylate Monomers on Tensile Bond Strength Between Resilient Liner and Acrylic Resin. Mater Res Innov 2009; 13: 431-5
  11. Akin H, Tugut F, Mutaf B, Guney U. Investigation of Bonding Properties of Denture Bases to SiliconeBased Soft Denture Liner İmmersed in İsobutyl Methacrylate and 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate. J Adv Prosthodont 2014; 6: 121-5.
  12. Johnson JA, Jones DW. The Mechanical Properties of PMMA and Its Copolymers with Ethyl Methacrylate and Butyl Methacrylate. J Mater Sci 1994; 29: 870-6
  13. Sahin O, Ozdemir AK, Turgut M, Boztug A, Sumer Z. Investigation of Flexural Strength and Cytotoxicity of Acrylic Resin Copolymers by Using Different Polymerization Methods. J Adv Prosthodont 2015; 7: 98-107
  14. Emileh A, Far