SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

RADIOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF SUPERNUMERARY TEETH IN THE SOUTHERN TURKISH INDIVIDUALS

GÜNEYLİ TÜRK BİREYLERDE SÜPERNÜMERE DİŞLERİN RADYOGRAFİK ÖZELLİKLERİ

Hümeyra TERCANLI ALKIŞ
Sevcihan GÜNEN YILMAZ
Pages
55–60
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Chi-square test wasperformed for comparing the frequency ofsupernumerary teeth between female and malepatients. p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to assess radiographicfeatures of supernumerary teeth and demographicfactors of Southern Turkish individuals.Material and Method: Retrospectively; panoramicradiographs of 3713 randomly selected individualswere analyzed by two oral radiologists based on thepresence of supernumerary teeth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aim: The aim of this study was to assess radiographicfeatures of supernumerary teeth and demographicfactors of Southern Turkish individuals.Material and Method: Retrospectively; panoramicradiographs of 3713 randomly selected individualswere analyzed by two oral radiologists based on thepresence of supernumerary teeth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Chi-square test wasperformed for comparing the frequency ofsupernumerary teeth between female and malepatients. p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess radiographicfeatures of supernumerary teeth and demographicfactors of Southern Turkish individuals.Material and Method: Retrospectively; panoramicradiographs of 3713 randomly selected individualswere analyzed by two oral radiologists based on thepresence of supernumerary teeth. Chi-square test wasperformed for comparing the frequency ofsupernumerary teeth between female and malepatients. p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Güneyli Türk bireylerde süpernümere dişlerin radyografik özelliklerini ve demografik faktörlerini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Rastgele seçilen bireylerden elde edilen 3713 adet panoramik radyografi süpernümere diş varlığı açısından iki radyolog tarafından retrospektif olarak analiz edildi. Kadın erkek arasındaki süpernümere diş sıklığını kıyaslamak amacıyla ki kare testi uygulandı. p < 0.05 istatistiki olarak önemli sayıldı. Bulgular: 3713 bireyin 29’unda (0.78%) bir veya daha fazla süpernümere diş vardı (22, 6, ve 1 bireyde sırasıyla bir, iki ve üç süpernümere diş). 29 hastadan 16’sı kadın ve 13’ü erkekti. Toplam 37 süpernümere diş bulundu ve mandibulada (21 adet) süpernümere diş sıklığı maksilladan (16 adet) daha fazla bulundu. Cinsiyete göre dağılımda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark yoktu. Sonuç: 3713 panoramik radyografi değerlendirmesi sonucu süpernümere diş prevelansı 0.78% olarak bulundu. Süpernümere diş mandibulada maksilladan daha sıktı ve cinsiyet dağılımında istatiksel bir farklılık bulunamadı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALKIŞ, H. T., YILMAZ, S. G. (2022). RADIOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF SUPERNUMERARY TEETH IN THE SOUTHERN TURKISH INDIVIDUALS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 55–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/451766

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Kashyap RR, Kashyap RS, Kini R, Naik V. Prevalence of hyperdontia in nonsyndromic South Indian population: An institutional analysis. Indian J Dent 2015; 6: 135-8.
  2. Ata-Ali F, Ata-Ali J, Penarrocha-Oltra D, Penarrocha-Diago M. Prevalence, etiology, diagnosis, treatment and complications of supernumerary teeth. J Clin Exp Dent 2014; 6: 414-8.
  3. Singh VP, Sharma A, Sharma S. Supernumerary teeth in Nepalese children. Scı World J 2014; 2014: 215396. Cassetta M, Altieri F, Giansanti M, Di-Giorgio R, Calasso S. Morphological and topographical characteristics of posterior supernumerary molar teeth: an epidemiological study on 25,186 subjects. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014; 19: 545-9.
  4. Kara MI, Aktan AM, Ay S, Bereket C, Sener I, Bulbul M, Ezirganli S, Polat HB. Characteristics of 351 supernumerary molar teeth in Turkish population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17: 395-400.
  5. Demiriz L, Durmuslar MC, Misir AF. Prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth: A survey on 7348 people. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015; 5: 39-43.
  6. Cassetta M, Altieri F, Di Mambro A, Galluccio G, Barbato E. Impaction of permanent mandibular second molar: a retrospective study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013; 18: 564-68.
  7. Subasioglu A, Savas S, Kucukyilmaz E, Kesim S, Yagci A, Dundar M. Genetic background of supernumerary teeth. Eur J Dent 2015; 9: 153- 8. Kumar DK, Gopal KS. An epidemiological study on supernumerary teeth: a survey on 5,000 people. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7: 1504- 7. De Oliveira Gomes C, Drummond SN, Jham BC, Abdo EN, Mesquita RA. A survey of 460 supernumerary teeth in Brazilian children and adolescents. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008; 18: 98-106.
  8. Mahabob MN, Anbuselvan GJ, Kumar BS, Raja S, Kothari S. Prevalence rate of supernumerary teeth among non-syndromic South Indian population: An analysis. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2012; 4: 373-5.
  9. Mercuri E, Cassetta M, Cavallini C, Vicari D, Leonardi R, Barbato E. Dental anomalies and clinical features in patients with maxillary canine impaction. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 22-8.
  10. Shah A, Gill DS, Tredwin C, Naini FB. Diagnosis and management of supernumerary teeth. Dent Update 2008; 35: 510-2, 514-6, 519-520.
  11. Solares R, Romero MI. Supernumerary premolars: a literature review. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26: 450-8.
  12. Celikoglu M, Kamak H, Oktay H. Prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a nonsyndrome Turkish population: associated pathologies and proposed treatment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15: 575-8. Kuchler E