SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

INVESTIGATION OF SMEAR LAYER REMOVAL EFFECTIVENESS OF MELATONIN AS AN ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATION SOLUTION: SEM STUDY

ALTERNATİF BİR İRİGASYON SOLUSYONU OLARAK MELATONİNİN SMEAR TABAKASI UZAKLAŞTIRMA ETKİNLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ: SEM ÇALIŞMASI

Emrah KARATAŞLIOĞLU
Samet TOSUN
Pages
576–581
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When smear removal effect of the groups were evaluated, sodium hypochlorite + ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid was found to have the best smear removal capacity in the apical one-third region (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the smear layer removal effectiveness of melatonin which was used alone, together with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and with 17% ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid as a root canal irrigation solution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 75 freshly-extracted, single-rooted, human maxillary central incisors were selected for this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When smear removal effect of the groups were evaluated, sodium hypochlorite + ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid was found to have the best smear removal capacity in the apical one-third region (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the smear layer removal effectiveness of melatonin which was used alone, together with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and with 17% ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid as a root canal irrigation solution. Materials and Methods: A total of 75 freshly-extracted, single-rooted, human maxillary central incisors were selected for this study. Following decoronation of teeth, remaining root parts were subdivided into five groups according to irrigation protocols groups (n = 15): Group 1: 5.25 % sodium hypochlorite; Group 2: 0.2 % melatonin; Group 3: 5.25 % sodium hypochlorite + 17 % ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid; Grup 4: 5.25 % sodium hypochlorite + 0.2 % melatonin; Grup 5: 0.2 % melatonin + 17 % ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid. All the roots were longitudinally split into two halves. Presence of smear layer, if present the amount of it was examined and scored on these half parts by using scanning electron microscopy. The data were analyzed statistically by using Kruskal-Wallis test in SPSS program (p = 0.05). Results: When melatonin was compared to sodium hypochlorite, smear removal capacity was significantly higher in coronal and middle one–third region of the root canal (p 0.05). When smear removal effect of the groups were evaluated, sodium hypochlorite + ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid was found to have the best smear removal capacity in the apical one-third region (P

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, melatoninin kök kanalirigasyon solüsyonu olarak tek başına, % 5.25 sodyumhipoklorit ve % 17 etilendiamintetraasetikasit ile birliktekullanımının smear tabakasını kaldırma etkisiniincelemektir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Toplam 75 adet yeni çekilmiş, tekköklü, insan maksiller santral kesici dişi bu çalışma içinseçildi. Dişler kuronlarından keserek ayrıldıktan sonrakalan kökler irigasyon protokollerine göre (n = 15) beşgruba ayrıldı: Grup 1: % 5.25 sodyum hipoklorit; Grup 2:% 0.2 melatonin Grup 3: % 5.25 sodyum hipoklorit + %17 etilendiamintetraasetikasit; Grup 3: % 5.25 sodyumhipoklorit + % 0.2 melatonin Grup 5: % 0.2 melatonin +% 17 etilendiamintetraasetikasit. Kökler uzun eksenleriboyunca iki yarım parçaya ayrıldı. Bu parçalar üzerindesmear tabakasının varlığı; şayet var ise miktarı taramalıelektron mikroskobu kullanılarak incelendi ve skorlandı.Elde edilen veriler SPSS programında Kruskal-Wallis testikullanılarak istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi (p =0.05).Bulgular: Melatonin sodyum hipoklorit ile kıyaslandığında,kök kanalının koronal ve orta üçlü bölgesinde smearkaldırma kapasitesi anlamlı derecede yüksek bulundu(p0.05). Apikal bölgedegrupların smear kaldırma etkinlikleri değerlendirildiğindesodyum hipoklorit + etilendiamintetraasetikasit en iyismear kaldırma kapasitesine sahip bulundu. (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KARATAŞLIOĞLU, E., TOSUN, S. (2022). INVESTIGATION OF SMEAR LAYER REMOVAL EFFECTIVENESS OF MELATONIN AS AN ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATION SOLUTION: SEM STUDY. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 576–581. https://ajindex.com/articles/451744

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Basrani B, Haapasalo M. Update on endodontic irrigating solutions. Endod Topics 2012;27:74- 102. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006;32:389-98.
  2. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Br Dent J 2014; 216: 299. Whitten BH, Gardiner DL, Jeansonne BG, Lemon RR. Current trends in endodontic treatment: report of a national survey. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1333-41.
  3. Hülsmann M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J 2003;36:810-30.
  4. Topbas C, Adiguzel O. Endodontic Irrigation Solutions: A Review. Int Dent Res 2017;7:54-61.
  5. Segura JJ, Calvo JR, Guerrero JM, Sampedro C, Jimenez A, Llamas R. The disodium salt of EDTA inhibits the binding of vasoactive intestinal peptide to macrophage membranes: endodontic implications. J Endod 1996;22:337-40.
  6. Amaral K, Rogero M, Fock R, Borelli P, Gavini G. Cytotoxicity analysis of EDTA and citric acid applied on murine resident macrophages culture. Int Endod J 2007;40:338-43.
  7. Kose O, Arabaci T, Kara A, Yemenoglu H, Kermen E, Kizildag A, et al. Effects of melatonin on oxidative stress index and alveolar bone loss in diabetic rats with periodontitis. J Periodontol 2016;87:82-90.
  8. Arabacı T, Kermen E, Özkanlar S, Köse O, Kara A, Kızıldağ A, et al. Therapeutic effects of melatonin on alveolar bone resorption after experimental periodontitis in rats: A biochemical and immunohistochemical study. J Periodontol 2015;86:874-81.
  9. Tekbas OF, Ogur R, Korkmaz A, Kilic A, Reiter RJ. Melatonin as an antibiotic: new insights into the actions of this ubiquitous molecule. J Pin Res 2008;44:222-6.
  10. Boga JA, Coto‐Montes A, Rosales‐Corral SA, Tan DX, Reiter RJ. Beneficial actions of melatonin in the management of viral infections: a new use for this “molecular handyman”? Rev Med Virol 2012;22:323-38.
  11. Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Zohaib S, Zafar MS. Therapeutic potential of melatonin in oral medicine and periodontology. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2016;32:391-6.
  12. Hülsmann M, Rümmelin C, Schäfers F. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation. J Endod 1997;23:301-6.
  13. Hülsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during root canal irrigation–literature review and case reports. Int Endod J 2000;33:186-93.
  14. Czonstkowsky M, Wilson EG, Holstein F. The smear layer in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1990;34:13-25.
  15. Teixeira C, Felippe M, Felippe W. The effect of application time of EDTA and N