SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 6

Effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on root canal dentin: A SEM/EDX study

Samet TOSUN
Emrah KARATAŞLIOĞLU
Pages
1695–1699
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, Group5 was as effective as group 3 in SR removal.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the effects of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE) and its combination with EDTA and NaOCl on the surface of rootcanal dentine.Material and Methods: Ninety human extracted central anterior teeth were instrumented.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Teeth were divided into six groupsaccording to irrigation regime: (n=15).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, Group5 was as effective as group 3 in SR removal.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effects of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE) and its combination with EDTA and NaOCl on the surface of rootcanal dentine.Material and Methods: Ninety human extracted central anterior teeth were instrumented. Teeth were divided into six groupsaccording to irrigation regime: (n=15). Group 0 (negative control) saline; group 1: 5.25% NaOCl/ distilled water (positive control);group 2: 0.5% CAPE; group 3: 5.25% NaOCl/17% EDTA; group 4: 5.25% NaOCl/0.5% CAPE and group 5: 0.5% CAPE/17% EDTA. Rootswere splitted longitudinally and examined under scanning electron microscopy. Energy Dispersive X-Ray (EDX) method was used toanalyse the root dentine mineral content.Results: A significant difference in smear layer (SR) was found between group 3 and group 4 (P0.05).Conclusions: In this study, CAPE did not result in better SR removal compared to NaOCl at all levels of the root canals. Overall, Group5 was as effective as group 3 in SR removal. The mineral content of root dentin has changed.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOSUN, S., KARATAŞLIOĞLU, E. (2022). Effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on root canal dentin: A SEM/EDX study. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 6, 1695–1699. https://ajindex.com/articles/446523

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Violich D, Chandler N. The smear layer in endodontics–a review. Inter Endod J 2010;43:2-15
  2. Jain H, Rao S, Johnson AD, et al. Evaluation of SmearOFF, maleic acid and two EDTA preparations in smear layer removal from root canal dentin AU - Ballal, Nidambur Vasudev. Acta Odontol Scand 2019;77:28- 32
  3. Nassar M, Hiraishi N, Tamura Y, et al. Phytic acid: An alternative root canal chelating agent. J Endod 2015;4:242-7
  4. Dutner J, Mines P, Anderson A. Irrigation trends among American Association of Endodontists members: a web-based survey. J Endod 2012;38:37-40
  5. Andrabi SM-U-N, Kumar A, Tewari RK, et al. An in vitro SEM study on the effectiveness of smear layer removal of four different irrigations. Iran EndodJ 2012;7:171
  6. Calt S, Serper A. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. J Endod 2002;28:17-9
  7. Grawehr M, Sener B, Waltimo T, et al. Interactions of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid with sodium hypochlorite in aqueous solutions. Inter Endod J 2003;36:411-5
  8. Mohammadi Z. Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: an update review. Inter Dent J 2008;58:329-41
  9. Ok E, Adanir N, Ozturk T. Antibacterial and smear layer removal capability of oregano extract solution. Eur J Dent 2015;9:20-4
  10. Mehmet G, Gunay A, Tanik A. An evaluation of the effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester and Ankaferd blood stopper on secondary wound healing of oral mucosal tissue. Turk J Med Sci 2020;50:248-57
  11. Ucan MC, Koparal M, Agacayak S, et al. Influence of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on bone healing in a rat model. J Int Med Res 2013;41:1648-54
  12. Gunay A, Arpag OF, Atilgan S, et al. Effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on palatal mucosal defects and tooth extraction sockets. Drug Des Devel Ther 2014;8:2069-74
  13. Arasoglu T, Derman S, Mansuroglu B. Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of caffeic acid phenethyl ester and PLGA nanoparticle formulation by different methods. Nanotechnol 2016;15;27:025103
  14. Pedrosa VO, Franca FMG, Turssi CP, Amaral F, Teixeira LN, Martinez EF, et al. Effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester application on dentin MMP-2, stability of bond strength and failure mode of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems. Arch Oral Biol 2018;94:16-26
  15. Spano JC, Silva RG, Guedes DF, et al. Atomic absorption spectrometry and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of concentration of calcium ions and smear layer removal with root canal chelators. J Endod 2009;35:727-30
  16. Buldur B, Kapdan A. Comparison of th