Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

EXAMINATION OF THE DIFFERENCE IN PERCEPTION OF ESTHETIC PARAMETERS OF SPECIALIST DENSTIST AND DENTAL STUDENTS BY USING VISUAL ANALOG SCALE

GÖRSEL ANALOG SKALASI KULLANILARAK UZMAN DİŞ HEKİMLERİ VE DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN ESTETİK PARAMETRELERİNİN ALGILANMASINDAKİ FARKLILIĞIN İNCELENMESİ

Pages
607–613
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Photos have been modified by using Adobe Photoshop program in increments of 0.5 mm.Results:A statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of statistical analysis evaluations in the study which examined the perception of changing aesthetic parameters of first and fifth grade students of specialist dentists.( p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim:All people want to have aesthetically pleasing facial features, among them a beautiful smile that they most desire.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was aimed to evaluate the aesthetic perceptions and what an attractive smile should have in order to determine the changing aesthetic parameters during the full smile of the patients by profesional dentists and dental students.Material and Methods:24 photos taken in smiles from the patients were asked to be shown to the profesional dentists and dental students in random order and evaluated according to their attractiveness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Photos have been modified by using Adobe Photoshop program in increments of 0.5 mm.Results:A statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of statistical analysis evaluations in the study which examined the perception of changing aesthetic parameters of first and fifth grade students of specialist dentists.( p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim:All people want to have aesthetically pleasing facial features, among them a beautiful smile that they most desire. In recent years, interest in dental aesthetics has begun to grow. It is seen that there are differences in aesthetic evaluationsbetween dentists and individuals. It was aimed to evaluate the aesthetic perceptions and what an attractive smile should have in order to determine the changing aesthetic parameters during the full smile of the patients by profesional dentists and dental students.Material and Methods:24 photos taken in smiles from the patients were asked to be shown to the profesional dentists and dental students in random order and evaluated according to their attractiveness. Participants in the study were asked to ratethe images of midline deviation, occlusal plane inclination, gummy smile and ratio of central teeth to other teeth. Photos have been modified by using Adobe Photoshop program in increments of 0.5 mm.Results:A statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of statistical analysis evaluations in the study which examined the perception of changing aesthetic parameters of first and fifth grade students of specialist dentists.( p

Özet

Amaç:Bütün insanlar estetik olarak hoş yüz özelliklerine sahip olmayı istemektedirler , bunların içinde de en çok arzuladıkları güzel bir gülümsemedir. Son yıllarda dental estetiğe olan ilgi giderek artmaya başlamıştır. Diş hekimleri ve halktan bireylerarasında estetik değerlendirmelerde farklılıklar olduğu görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada uzman diş hekimleri ve diş hekimliği öğrencilerinin hastaların tam gülümseme esnasında, değişen estetik parametrelerinin belirlenerek estetik algılarının ve çekici bir gülümsemenin nelere sahip olması gerektiğinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.Materyal ve Metod:Hastalardan gülümseme halinde çekilmiş 24 fotoğraf, uzman diş hekimlerine ve diş hekimliği öğrencilerine rastgele bir sırayla gösterilip çekiciliklerine göre değerlendirmeleri istenmiştir. Çalışmaya katılan kişilerden orta hat kayması, okluzal düzlem eğimi, dişeti görünürlük(gummy smile) miktarı ve santral dişlerin diğer diĢlere göre oranlarının düzenlemesi yapılmıĢ fotoğrafları değerlendirmeleri istenmiştir. Fotoğraflarda 0.5‟er mm artan oranlarla Adobe Photoshop programı kullanılarak değişiklikler uygulanmıştır.Bulgular:Uzman diş hekimleri, 1. ve 5. Sınıf öğrencilerinin değişen estetik parametreleri algılarının incelendiği çalıĢmada istatiksel analiz değerlendirmeleri sonucunda gruplar arasında istatiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar bulundu ( p

🔖

Cite This Article

YANIKOĞLU, N., CANSEVER, S., BAL, H. R. (2022). EXAMINATION OF THE DIFFERENCE IN PERCEPTION OF ESTHETIC PARAMETERS OF SPECIALIST DENSTIST AND DENTAL STUDENTS BY USING VISUAL ANALOG SCALE. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 607–613. https://ajindex.com/articles/451644

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Machado AW, Moon W, Gandini LG, Jr. Influence of maxillary incisor edge asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop May 2013;143:658-64
  2. McLeod C, Fields HW, Hechter F, Wiltshire W, Rody W, Jr., Christensen J. Esthetics and smile characteristics evaluated by laypersons. Angle Orthod Mar 2011;81:198-205
  3. Nascimento DC, Santos ER, Machado AW, Bittencourt MAV. Influence of buccal corridor dimension on smile esthetics. Dental Press J Orthod 2012;17:145-50
  4. Van der Geld P, Oosterveld P, Van Heck G, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Smile attractiveness. Selfperception and influence on personality. Angle Orthod Sep 2007;77:759-65
  5. Koidou VP, Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Celebrity smile esthetics assessment: Smile angulation. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:636-41
  6. Tjan AH, Miller GD, The JG. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:24-8
  7. Kokich VO, Jr., Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:311-24
  8. Abu Alhaija ESJ, Al-Shamsi NO, Al-Khateeb S. Perceptions of Jordanian laypersons and dental professionals to altered smile aesthetics. Eur J Orthodont 2011;33:450-6
  9. Ker AJ, Chan R, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson's perspective A computer-based survey study. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:1318-27
  10. Parekh SM, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod 2006;76:557-63
  11. Rodrigues CDT, Magnani R, Machado MSC, Oliveira OB. The perception of smile attractiveness variations from esthetic norms, photographic framing and order of presentation. Angle Orthod 2009;79:634-9
  12. Krishnan V, Daniel ST, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2008;133:515-23
  13. Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Aug 2006;130:141-51
  14. Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Public preferences for anterior tooth variations: a web-based study. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14: 97-106
  15. Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza MA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Ort