Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

INVESTIGATION OF EFFECTIVE OF ADHESIVE CEMENTS ON THE BONDING OFDIFFERENT POST SYSTEMS

FARKLI POST SĠSTEMLERĠNĠN TUTUCULUĞUNDA YAPIġTIRMA SĠMANLARININ ETKĠSĠNĠN ĠNCELENMESĠ

Pages
267–273
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: According to the results of the variance analysis, it was found that the post type (P < 0.001), the cement type and post-cement interaction had statistically significant effect (P < 0.05) on the bond strength of post to root dentin.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study was carried out to investigate the effect of three different cement (zinc phosphate, glass ionomer, resin cement) on the retention of different post systems (cast post, ceramic post) and to determine the suitable combination for retention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The samples were divided into three groups (sandblasting/ unsandblasting cast post or prefabricated ceramic post) (n=3).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: According to the results of the variance analysis, it was found that the post type (P < 0.001), the cement type and post-cement interaction had statistically significant effect (P < 0.05) on the bond strength of post to root dentin.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: This study was carried out to investigate the effect of three different cement (zinc phosphate, glass ionomer, resin cement) on the retention of different post systems (cast post, ceramic post) and to determine the suitable combination for retention. Material and Methods: Ninety extracted human teeth with single root were used in the study. The teeth were stored in distilled water until preparation. The crown of each tooth was removed from one mm above of the cemento-enamel junction by using a diamond cyclindirical bur. Endodontic treatment were performed on the teeth and post spaces were prepared by using a special drill of Cosmo post systems. The roots were embedded in acrylic blocks. The samples were divided into three groups (sandblasting/ unsandblasting cast post or prefabricated ceramic post) (n=3). Each of these groups was divided into 3 subgroups for three different cements (zinc phosphate, glass ionomer and resin cement). After cementation, tensile force was applied on the samples. ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range tests were performed for statistical analysis (P = 0.05). Results: According to the results of the variance analysis, it was found that the post type (P < 0.001), the cement type and post-cement interaction had statistically significant effect (P < 0.05) on the bond strength of post to root dentin. Conclusions: The best retention was seen in the sandblasting cast post cemented with zinc phosphate cement and with glass ionomer cement. On the other hand, the prefabricated ceramic post cemented with zinc phosphate cement and unsandblasting cast post cemented with resin cement showed the least retention.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalıĢma, farklı post sistemlerinin (döküm post, hazır seramik post) tutuculuğu üzerine üç farklı simanın (çinko fosfat, cam iyonomer, resin siman) etkisini incelemek ve karĢılaĢtırmak amacıyla yapılmıĢtır. Gereç ve yöntem: ÇalıĢmada 90 adet tek köklü çekilmiĢ insan diĢi kullanılmıĢtır. DiĢler preparasyon yapılıncaya kadar distile su içerisinde bekletilmiĢtir. Her bir diĢin kuron kısmı, mine-sement birleĢim yerinden 1 mm yukarıda olacak Ģekilde elmas silindirik frez yardımıyla uzaklaĢtırılmıĢtır. DiĢlere kanal tedavisi uygulanmıĢ, daha sonra Cosmo post sisteminde bulunan özel bir frez ile post boĢlukları hazırlanmıĢtır. Kökler uzun aksları horizontal düzleme dik olacak Ģekilde parelelometre ile akrilik bloklara gömülmüĢtür. Elde edilen örnekler; kumlanmıĢ ve kumlanmamıĢ döküm post ile hazır seramik post için 30’arlı üç gruba ayrılmıĢtır. Her grup da üç farklı siman (çinko fosfat, cam iyonomer ve rezin siman) ile yapıĢtırılmak üzere 10’arlı üç alt gruba ayrılmıĢtır. Simantasyon sonrası hazırlanan örneklere çekme kuvveti uygulanmıĢtır. Ġstatiksel analizlerde ANOVA ve Duncan çoklu karĢılaĢtırma testi uygulanmıĢtır (P = 0.05). Bulgular: ÇalıĢmanın sonucunda, en iyi tutuculuğu çinko-fosfat siman ve cam iyonomer siman ile yapıĢtırılan kumlanmıĢ döküm post, en az tutuculuğu ise rezin simanla yapıĢtırılan kumlanmamıĢ döküm post sistemi ve çinko-fosfat simanla yapıĢtırılan hazır seramik post sistemi göstermiĢtir. Sonuçlar: Kumlama yapılmıĢ postlar ile yapılmamıĢ postlar karĢılaĢtırıldığında, kumlama sonucunda retansiyonda artıĢ gözlenmiĢtir. Hazır seramik post için ise en iyi retansiyon cam iyonomer siman grubunda görülmüĢtür.

🔖

Cite This Article

YANIKOĞLU, N., YILMAZ, B. (2022). INVESTIGATION OF EFFECTIVE OF ADHESIVE CEMENTS ON THE BONDING OFDIFFERENT POST SYSTEMS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 267–273. https://ajindex.com/articles/451679

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Santos Pantaleón D, Morrow BR, Cagna DR, Pameijer CH, Garcia-Godoy F. Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure on fracture resistance and failure mode of restored endodontically treated maxillary incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119: 390-6
  2. Morgano SM and Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70: 11-6
  3. Habib B, von Fraunhofer JA and Driscoll CF. 2005. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores. J Prosthodont 2005; 14: 164-9
  4. Kurer PF. 'A clinical survey of failed post retained crowns'. Br Dent J. 1988; 165: 420
  5. O'Keefe KL, Miller BH and Powers JM. In vitro tensile bond strength of adhesive cements to new post materials. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 47-51
  6. Munaga S, Das A, Kaur T, Yaqoob A, Mokashi R and Ismail PM. Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Composite Overcast Gold Post and Core Buildups in Endodontically Treated Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19: 1273-7
  7. Theodosopoulou JN and Chochlidakis KM. A systematic review of dowel (post) and core materials and systems. J Prosthodont 2009; 18: 464-72
  8. Basaran ET and Gokce Y. Evaluation of the influence of various restoration techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with different cavity wall thicknesses. Niger J Clin Pract 2019: 22: 328-34
  9. Maroulakos G, He J and Nagy WW. The Postendodontic Adhesive Interface: Theoretical Perspectives and Potential Flaws. J endod 2018; 44: 363-71
  10. Culhaoglu AK, Özcan E, Kilicarslan MA and Seker E. Effect of Boric Acid Versus Conventional Irrigation Solutions on the Bond Strength Between Fiber Post and Root Dentin. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19: 137-46
  11. Aleisa K, Al-Dwairi ZN, Alsubait SA and Morgano SM. Pull-out retentive strength of fiber posts cemented at different times in canals obturated with a eugenol-based sealer. J prosthet Dent 2016; 116: 85-90. 12.Helfer AR, Melnick S and Schilder H. Determination of the moisture content of vital and pulpless teeth. Oral surg oral med oral pathol 1972; 34: 661-70
  12. Zamin C, Silva-Sousa YT, Souza-Gabriel AE, Messias DF and Sousa-Neto MD. Fracture susceptibility of endodontically treated teeth. Dental Traumatology 2012; 28: 282-6
  13. Assif D, Oren E, Marshak BL and Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 535-43
  14. Moulin P, Degrange M and Picard B. Influence of