SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT POLYMERIZATION TYPE ON WATER SORPTION AND SOLUBILITY OF ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS≠

ADEZİV REZİN SİMANLARIN SU EMİLİMİ VE SUDA ÇÖZÜNÜRLÜĞÜ ÜZERİNE FARKLI POLİMERİZASYON YÖNTEMLERİNİN ETKİSİ

Nuri BAKAN
Mustafa GÜNDOĞDU
Murat ALKURT
Esra GÜNDOĞDU
Zeynep YEŞİL DUYMUŞ
Pages
599–605
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The water sorption and solubility were significantly different among the adhesive resin cements (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different polymerization types on water sorption and solubility of adhesive resin cements.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: Two self-etch adhesive resin cements (Duo-Link B, Clearfil Esthetic Cement C) and two selfadhesive resin cements (RelyX U200 Automix R, Maxcem Elite M) were tested in the present study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The water sorption and solubility were significantly different among the adhesive resin cements (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different polymerization types on water sorption and solubility of adhesive resin cements. Material and methods: Two self-etch adhesive resin cements (Duo-Link B, Clearfil Esthetic Cement C) and two selfadhesive resin cements (RelyX U200 Automix R, Maxcem Elite M) were tested in the present study. Twenty-four specimens were prepared for each adhesive resin cement and divided into 3 groups according to the polymerization type used: lightcuring, double light-curing, and self-curing. The water sorption and solubility were determined according to ISO 4049:2009. Data were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance, and the post-hoc Tukey test (α=0.05). Results: The water sorption and solubility were significantly different among the adhesive resin cements (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı adeziv rezin simanların su emilimi ve suda çözünürlüğü üzerine polimerizasyon yönteminin etkisinin incelenmesidir. Gereç ve yöntem: Mevcut çalışmada 2 farklı self-etch adeziv rezin siman (Duo-Link B, Clearfil Esthetic Cement C) ve 2 farklı self adeziv rezin siman (RelyX U200 Automix R, Maxcem Elite M) test edildi. Her bir adeziv rezin siman için 24 adet örnek hazırlandı ve kullanılan polimerizasyon yöntemine göre 3 farklı gruba ayrıldı; ışıkla polimerizasyon, iki kez ışıkla polimerizasyon ve kimyasal polimerizasyon. Su emilimi ve suda çözünürlük testi ISO 4049:2009 standardına göre yapıldı. Veriler tek yönlü varyans analizi ile analiz edildi ve Tukey testi anlamlı farklılıkları tespit etmek için kullanıldı (α=0.05). Bulgular: Adeziv rezin simanlar arasında su emilimi ve suda çözünürlük değerleri anlamlı olarak farklıydı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BAKAN, N., GÜNDOĞDU, M., ALKURT, M., GÜNDOĞDU, E., DUYMUŞ, Z. Y. (2022). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT POLYMERIZATION TYPE ON WATER SORPTION AND SOLUBILITY OF ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS≠. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 599–605. https://ajindex.com/articles/451624

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:389-404
  2. Edelhoff D, Brix O. All-ceramic restorations in different indications: a case series. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142 Suppl 2:14S-9S
  3. Vargas MA, Bergeron C, Diaz-Arnold A. Cementing all-ceramic restorations: recommendations for success. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142 Suppl 2:20S- 4S
  4. Vrochari AD, Eliades G, Hellwig E, Wrbas KT. Water sorption and solubility of four self-etching, selfadhesive resin luting agents. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12:39-43
  5. Hill EE, Lott J. A clinically focused discussion of luting materials. Aust Dent J 2011;56 Suppl 1:67- 76
  6. Weiser F, Behr M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a clinical review. J Prosthodont 2015;24:100-8
  7. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJT. Selfadhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:295- 314
  8. Shiozawa M, Takahashi H, Asakawa Y, Iwasaki N. Color stability of adhesive resin cements after immersion in coffee. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:309-17
  9. Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G. Effect of different light curing methods on mechanical and physical properties of resin-cements polymerized through ceramic discs. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19:403-12
  10. Petropoulou A, Vrochari AD, Hellwig E, Stampf S, Polydorou O. Water sorption and water solubility of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:674-9
  11. Marghalani HY. Sorption and solubility characteristics of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 2012;28:e187-98
  12. Leal CL, Queiroz A, Foxton RM, Argolo S, Mathias P, Cavalcanti AN. Water sorption and solubility of luting agents used under ceramic laminates with different degrees of translucency. Oper Dent 2016;41:E141-E148
  13. Muller JA, Rohr N, Fischer J. Evaluation of ISO 4049: water sorption and water solubility of resin cements. Eur J Oral Sci 2017;125:141-150
  14. Meşe A, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Sorption and solubility of luting cements in different solutions. Dent Mater J 2008;27:702-9
  15. Silva EM, Noronha-Filho JD, Amaral CM, Poskus LT, Guimarães JG. Long-term degradation of resinbased cements in substances present in the oral environment: influence of activation mode. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21:271-7
  16. Kim HJ, Bagheri R, Kim YK, Son JS, Kwon TY. Influence of curing mode on the surface energy and sorption/solubility of dental self-adhesive resin cements. Materials (Basel) 2017;10:129