Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

FACTORS AFFECTING EARLY MARGINAL BONE RESORPTION AROUND DENTAL IMPLANTS

DENTAL İMPLANTLAR ETRAFINDA ERKEN DÖNEM MARJİNAL KEMİK REZORPSİYONUNU ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER

Pages
639–651
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to the factors related to the implant, abutment and restoration, factors such as occlusal trauma and amount of supracrestal soft tissue were also examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Each year, the preference for replacement of lost teeth with dental implants increases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main reason of this interest is the high success rates of this treatment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to the factors related to the implant, abutment and restoration, factors such as occlusal trauma and amount of supracrestal soft tissue were also examined.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Each year, the preference for replacement of lost teeth with dental implants increases. The main reason of this interest is the high success rates of this treatment. Scientific studies, could not agree on standardized criteria to define the success of dental implant treatment. Considering the parameters evaluated by different researchers, marginal bone loss occurring the first year around dental implants is one of the most frequently used criteria. Marginal bone loss observed after the first year of function has been considered to be normal. The literature reports that in the first year after placement a change in marginal bone level ranging 1,5 mm to 2 mm is expected. In order to control this bone loss, it's important to know factors affecting this process. Advances in science and technology could further reduce the early bone loss. The aim of this review is to evaluate the factors that are effective in bone loss occurring around the implants in the early period. In addition to the factors related to the implant, abutment and restoration, factors such as occlusal trauma and amount of supracrestal soft tissue were also examined.

Özet

Her geçen yıl diş eksikliklerinde dental implantların kullanımı artmaktadır. Bu ilginin artmasındaki en temel neden implant tedavisinin yüksek başarıya sahip olmasıdır. Bilimsel çalışmalarda dental implant başarısını ortaya koymak amacıyla belirlenmiş ortak kriterler bulunmamaktadır. Farklı araştrımacıların değerlendirdiği parametrelere bakıldığında dental implantlar çevresinde ilk yılda meydana gelen marjinal kemik kaybının en sık kullanılan kriterlerden biri olduğu göze çarpmaktadır. İmplant fonksiyona girdikten sonra ilk yılda meydana gelen kemik kaybı beklenen bir durumdur. Literatür, dental implantların fonksiyona girdiği ilk yılda marjinal kemik seviyesinde meydana gelen 1,5 - 2 mm' lik değişimin normal olduğunu bildirmektedir. Dental implantlar çevresinde ilk yılda meydana gelen kemik kaybı üzerine etkili faktörleri bilmek, ilk yılda meydana gelebilecek kemik kaybını kontrol altında tutmak adına önemlidir. Bununla birlikte gelişen bilim ve teknoloji ile ilk yılda kaybedilen kemik miktarının daha da azaltmak mümkün olabilir. Bu derlemenin amacı, erken dönemde implantlar etrafında meydana gelen kemik kayıplarında etkili olan faktörlerin değerlendirilmesidir. İmplant, dayanak ve restorasyona ait faktörlerin yanı sıra okluzal travma ve supra krestal yumuşak doku miktarı gibi etkenler de incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜR, E., ALAADDİNOĞLU, E. E. (2022). FACTORS AFFECTING EARLY MARGINAL BONE RESORPTION AROUND DENTAL IMPLANTS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 639–651. https://ajindex.com/articles/451549

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bouchard P, Renouard F, Bourgeois D, Fromentin O, Jeanneret MH, Beresniak A. Cost-effectiveness modeling of dental implant vs. bridge. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:583-7
  2. Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000 2017;73:7-21
  3. De Bruyn H, Raes S, Matthys C, Cosyn J. The current use of patient-centered/reported outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26 Suppl 11:45-56
  4. Straumann. How will dentistry look in 2020. 2012. https://www.straumann.com/content/dam/internet /straumann_com/resources/investor-relations/ publications-and-reports/capital-markets-day- 2012/how%20will%20dentistry%20in%202020%2 0look_straumann%20cmd2012_achermann.pdf (Erişim tarihi 30.03.2020)
  5. İMPLANTDER. Dental implant sektör raporu. http:// www.implantder.org/sektor-analizi/(Erişimtarihi 30.03.2020)
  6. Anitua E, Pinas L, Begona L, Orive G. Long-term retrospective evaluation of short implants in the posterior areas: clinical results after 10-12 years. J Clin Periodontol 2014;41:404-11
  7. Becker ST, Beck-Broichsitter BE, Rossmann CM, Behrens E, Jochens A, Wiltfang J. Long-term Survival of Straumann Dental Implants with TPS Surfaces: A Retrospective Study with a Follow-up of 12 to 23 Years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:480-8
  8. Cassetta M. Immediate loading of implants inserted in edentulous arches using multiple mucosasupported stereolithographic surgical templates: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45:526-34
  9. Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. 10-year prospective cohort follow-up of immediately restored XiVE implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:694-700
  10. Francetti L, Cavalli N, Taschieri S, Corbella S. Ten years follow-up retrospective study on implant survival rates and prevalence of peri-implantitis in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:252-60
  11. Jemt T. Implant Survival in the Posterior Partially Edentulous Arch-30 Years of Experience. Part IV: A Retro-Prospective Multivariable Regression Analysis on Implant Failures Related to Arch and Implant Surface. Int J Prosthodont 2019;32:143-52
  12. Karoussis IK, Bragger U, Salvi GE, Burgin W, Lang NP. Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15: