Journals / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Assessment of MCNPX Monte Carlo Code for Absorbed Dose Calculations in Mammogarphy Examination

Pages
48–55
Publication Date
2017-04-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate capabities of MCNPX monte carlo code for calculations

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: This study aimed to investigate capabities of MCNPX monte carlo code for calculations
📊
Key Findings & Data:Introduction: This study aimed to investigate capabities of MCNPX monte carlo code for calculations
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Introduction: This study aimed to investigate capabities of MCNPX monte carlo code for calculations
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mammography · Average Glandular Dose · Monte Carlo Method

Özet

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate capabities of MCNPX monte carlo code for calculations

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKİN, H. O., MESBAHİ, A., SİNGH, V. P., KARA, U., MANİCİ, T., ALTUNSOY, E. E. (2017). Assessment of MCNPX Monte Carlo Code for Absorbed Dose Calculations in Mammogarphy Examination. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 48–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/451534

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Sechopoulos I.,Suryanarayanan S., Vedantham S., D'Orsi C.J., Karellas A., 2008. Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study. Radiology.246(2):434-43 [2] Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi C, Karellas A., 2007. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys.34(1):221-32. [3] Bor D., Tukel S., Olgar T., Aydin E., 2008. Variations in breast doses for an automatic mammography unit. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 14:122-126. [4] Olgar T, Kahn T., Gosch D., 2012. Average Glandular Dose in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis. Fortschr. Röntgenstr. 184: 911–918. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312877. [5] Dance D.R., 1990. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. Phys. Med. Biol., Vol. 35,No 9, 1211-1219. [6] Ishii R.,Yoshida A., Ishii M., Fujimoto S., Henmi N., 2011. Precision of half-value layer measurement on mammography. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 67(12):1533-9. [7] Diffey J., Cartwright L., Crocker J., Heggie J., 2014. Direct half value layer measurements in mammography - is near enough good enough?.Combined Scientific Meeting. DOI:10.1594/ranzcr2014/R-0127 [8] Ramos M.A.P., Ferrer S., Verdu G., Padovani E., Campayo J.M., 2004. A mammographic phantom image reconstruction through Monte Carlo techniques. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, IEEE, Volume: 5 DOI: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2004.1466322 [9] Aznar M. C., Medin J., Hemdal B., Thilander Klang A., Bøtter-Jensen L., Mattsson S., 2005. A MONTE CARLO STUDY OF THE ENERGY DEPENDENCE OF Al2O3:C CRYSTALS FOR REAL-TIME IN VIVO DOSIMETRY IN MAMMOGRAPHY. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. Vol. 114, Nos 1-3, pp. 444–449. doi:10.1093/rpd/nch560 [10] Koutalonis M., Delis H., Spyrou G., Costaridou L., Tzanakos G., Panayiotakis G., 2007. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study. Phys. Med. Biol. 52. 3185–3199. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/11/017 [11] Douglas E. P., Kuruvilla V., 2000. Digital mammography image simulation using Monte Carlo. Medical Physics 27, 568. doi: 10.1118/1.598896 [12] Dance D. R., 1990. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose,’’ Phys. Med. Biol. 35, 1211– 1219. [13] Dance D. R., Skinner C. L., Young K. C., Beckett J. R. Kotre C. J., 2000. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys