SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Arkeoloji ve Sanat / 2012 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 141

PREHISTORICAL ROPE CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE (ETHNOARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY)

Prehistorik İp Yapım Tekniği (Etnoarkeolojik Bir Deneme)

Fecri POLAT
Pages
1–8
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Textile manufacturing organization, the first step in the making of the rope, the possible introduction of a model can be called the first a methodological application of techniques that may be, primitive rope construction technique was investigated by the societies today are use spindle whorls.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Textile finds are quite limited in the archaeological excavations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Most of the works in the textile, concentrate on ancient texts, archaeobotany and archaeofaunia materials.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Textile manufacturing organization, the first step in the making of the rope, the possible introduction of a model can be called the first a methodological application of techniques that may be, primitive rope construction technique was investigated by the societies today are use spindle whorls.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Textile finds are quite limited in the archaeological excavations. Spindle whorls are the most important data source for the production of textile. Most of the works in the textile, concentrate on ancient texts, archaeobotany and archaeofaunia materials. For this reason the pre-systematic on the textile is limited. Ç r k will be able to offer different perspective on issue of making rope in pre-spindle whorl. Nowadays, based on this tools which used together spindle whorl, in societies which used spindle whorl; making of primitive rope technique was researched. Textile manufacturing organization, the first step in the making of the rope, the possible introduction of a model can be called the first a methodological application of techniques that may be, primitive rope construction technique was investigated by the societies today are use spindle whorls.

Özet

Arkeolojik kazılarda tekstil ile ilgili buluntular oldukça kısıtlıdır. Tekstil üretimi ile ilgili en önemli veri kaynağı ağırşaklardır. Tekstil konusundaki çalışmaların çoğu, eski metinler, arkeobotanik ve arkeofaunal malzemeler üzerinde yoğunlaşmıştır. Bu nedenle tekstilin sistematiği öncesi ile ilgili çalışmalar sınırlıdır. Tekstil üretim sürecindeki ilk adım olan iplik yapımının olası ilk yapım tekniği, etnoarkeolojik araştırmaya dayalı olarak, günümüzde ip yapımında kullanılan ve çırık ismi verilen aletin kullanımıyla açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu alet; ağırşak öncesi ip yapımı konusunda farklı bir bakış açısı sunabilecektir. Günümüzde ağırşağın kullanıldığı toplumlarda, ağırşakla birlikte kullanılan bu alete dayanarak; tekstil üretim organizasyonunun ilk adımı olan ip yapımının, olası ilk olabilecek teknikleri konusunda bir model tanıtımı diyebileceğimiz metodolojik bir uygulamayla, ilkel ip yapım tekniği (yöntemi) araştırılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

POLAT, F. (2022). PREHISTORICAL ROPE CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE (ETHNOARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY). Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 141, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/448764

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bahn, P. 2001, “Palaeolithic Weaving – a Contribution from Chauvet”, Antiquity 75: 233-458,
  2. Glocester. Barber, E. J. W. 1991, Prehistoric Textiles: The Development of Cloth in The Neolithic and Bronze Ages with Special Reference to the Aegean, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  3. Barber, E. J. W. 1997, “Textiles: Textiles of the Neolithic through Iron Ages”, The Oxford Encyclopedia of Archaeology in The Near East 5: 190-195, Eric M. Meyers (ed.), Oxford University Press.
  4. Burke, R. 2000, From Minos to Midas: The Organization of Textile Production in the Aegean and in Anatolia (Minoan, Mycenaean, Phrygian), Michigan: UMI Dissertation Services. Davies, N. G. 1913,
  5. Five Theban Tombs, Archaeological Survey of Egypt Memoir 21, London. Delougaz, P. 1952,
  6. Pottery from the Diyala Region, Oriental Institute Publication 63, Chicago. Diakaios, P. 1969, Enkomi. Excavations 1948-1958 I. The Architectural Remains. The Tombs, Mainz am Rhein. Dörpfeld, W. 1902,
  7. Troja und Ilion, Beck and Bart, Athens. Duru, R. 1996,
  8. Kuruçay Höyük II, Ankara,
  9. TTK. Elster, E. S.; C. Renfrew 2003, Prehistoric Sitagroi Excavations in Northeast Greece, 1968-1970: 2, Los Angeles, University of California. Evely, R. D. G. 2000, “Minoan Crafts: Tools and Techniques”, SIMA XCII/2: 485-616, Paul ?ströms Förlag, Jonsered. Friedrich, J. 1960,
  10. Hethitisches Keilschrift-Lesebuch, Teil II: Schrifttafel und Erläuterungen, Heidelberg. Gachet, J. 1993, “Ugarit Ivories: Typology and Distribution”, Ivory in Greece and the Eastern Mediterranean from the Bronze Age to the Hellenistic Period, Lesley Fitton (ed.), British Museum Press.
  11. Guy, P. L. O. 1938,
  12. The Megiddo Tombs, Oriental Institute Publications 33, Chicago. Hall, R. 1986, Egyptian Textilles: The Archaeological Importance of Textiles Woven Fabrics and Dyeing, Spinning and Weaving, Bucks, Aylesburg. Hoffmann, M.; H. B. Burnham 1973 “Prehistory of Textiles in The Old World”, Viking XXXVII: 49-76, Tidsskrift for norrøn arkeologi,, Oslo. Koşay, H. Z. 1951, Türk Tarih Kurumu Tarafından Yapılan Alaca Höyük Kazısı 1937-1939’daki Çalışmalara ve Keşişere ait İlk Rapor, Ankara,
  13. TTK. Kramer, S. N. 1944, Sumerian Mythology. A Study of Spiritual and Literary Achievement in the Third Millennium, The American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia. Mellaart, J. 1961, “Excavations at Hacılar: Fourth Preliminary Report”, AnSt-11: 37-77, Journal of the British Enstitute of Archaeology at Ankara.
  14. Mellaart, J. 1962, “Excavations at Çatal Hüyük”, AnSt-12: 41-65, Journal of