SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Arkeoloji ve Sanat / 2018 / Cilt: 157 - Sayı: 157

STYLE AND HYPSOS IN DIONYSIUS OF HALICARNASSUS

Halikarnassoslu Dionysios’ta Biçem ve Hypsos

Esengül AKINCI ÖZTÜRK
Pages
95–102
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It also concerns the greatness of thought and emotion, as well as style involving figures, diction and composition.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, I will discuss the question of how Dionysius of Halicarnassus relates the category of the hypsos (the sublime) to the types of styles and his theory of composition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In his rhetorical works, he frequently uses the terms hypsos and hypsēlos when evaluating especially the styles of classical orators and writers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It also concerns the greatness of thought and emotion, as well as style involving figures, diction and composition.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this paper, I will discuss the question of how Dionysius of Halicarnassus relates the category of the hypsos (the sublime) to the types of styles and his theory of composition. In his rhetorical works, he frequently uses the terms hypsos and hypsēlos when evaluating especially the styles of classical orators and writers. As a representative of Greek classicism in Augustan period, Dionysius considers so much of ancient Greek writing to be sublime. Even though Dionysius utilizes the concept of the sublime mainly in the context of composition and style, for him hypsos is not identical with grand or elevated style. It also concerns the greatness of thought and emotion, as well as style involving figures, diction and composition.

Özet

Bu makalede, Halikarnassoslu Dionysios’un hypsos (yücelik) kategorisini üslup türleri ve kompozisyon teorisiyle nasıl ilişkilendirdiği sorusu ele alınacaktır. Dionysios hitabet sanatı üzerine yazdığı eserlerde, özellikle Klasik Dönem hatip ve yazarlarının biçemlerini değerlendirirken hypsos ve hypsēlos terim-lerini sıklıkla kullanmıştır. Augustus dönemi Grek klasisizminin temsilcilerinden biri olarak Dionysios, Klasik Hellen yazınının büyük bir kısmını yüce (hypsēlos) olarak değerlendirmektedir. Dionysios hyp-sos kavramını çoğunlukla biçem ve kompozisyon bağlamında kullanmış olmasına karşın, ona göre hypsos büyük ya da yüksek stille bir ve aynı şey değildir. Hypsos kategorisi figür, diksiyon ve kompo-zisyonu da barındıran stilin yanı sıra düşüncenin büyüklüğü ve duyguyu da konu edinir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, E. A. (2022). STYLE AND HYPSOS IN DIONYSIUS OF HALICARNASSUS. Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Cilt: 157 - Sayı: 157, 95–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/448454

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Critical Essays, Vol. I: Ancient Orators, Lysias, Isocrates, Isaeus, Demosthenes, Thucydides. (Çev. S. Usher), Harvard University Press,
  2. Cambridge, MA 1974 (Loeb Classical Library). Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Critical Essays, Vol. II: On Literary Composition, Dinarchus, Letters to Ammaeus and Pompeius. (Çev. S. Usher), Harvard University Press,
  3. Cambridge, MA 1985 (Loeb Classical Library). Horace, Satires, Epistles, The Art of Poetry. (Çev. H. R. Fairclough), Harvard University Press,
  4. Cambridge, MA 1926 (Loeb Classical Library). Longinus, On the Sublime: The Greek Text Edited after the Paris Manuscript with Introduction, Translation, Facsimiles and Appendices. (Yay. W. R. Roberts), 2. Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1907.
  5. Pausanias, Description of Greece, Vol. I: Books 1-2 (Attica and Corinth). (Çev. W. H. S. Jones), Harvard University Press,
  6. Cambridge, MA 1918 (Loeb Classical Library). Baker, D. 2004. “The Sublime: Origins and Definitions”, The Georgia Review 58/2: 303-309.
  7. Bowersock, G. W. 1985. “The Literature of The Empire: Strabo-Dionysius of Halicarnassus”, P. E. Easterling ve B. M. W. Knox (yay.) The Cambridge History of Classical Literature I: Greek Literature: 642-646.
  8. Cambridge University Press,
  9. Cambridge. Conte, G. B. 2007. The Poetry of Pathos: Studies in Virgilian Epic. Oxford University Press,
  10. Oxford. De Jonge, C. C. 2008.
  11. Between Grammar and Rhetoric. Brill, Leiden/Boston. De Jonge, C. C. 2012. “Dionysius and Longinus on the Sublime: Rhetoric and Religious Language”, American Journal of Philology 133/2: 271-300.
  12. De Jonge, C. C. 2014. “Style (léxis), Ancient Theories of”, G. K. Giannakis (yay.) Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics”, Vol. 3: 326- 331. Brill, Leiden/Boston. Dodds, E. R. 1951. The Greeks and the Irrational. University of California Press,
  13. Berkeley. Donadi, F. 2001. “Pseudo-Longinos”, Der Neue Pauly 10: 513-516.
  14. Doran, R. 2015. The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant. Cambridge University Press,
  15. Cambridge. Gelzer, T. 1979. “Klassizismus, Attizismus und Asianismus”, H. Flashar (yay.) Le Classicisme a Rome, aux Iers siecles avant et apres J.-C.: 1-55.
  16. Fondation Hardt, Geneve. Grube, G. M. A. 1995. The Greek and Roman Critics. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., Cambridge. Hidber, T. 2006. “Dionysius of Halicarnassus: Historian of the 1st century BC”, N. G. Wilson (yay.) Encyclopedia of the Ancient Greece: 228-230.
  17. Routledge, New York. Innes, D. 2002. “Longinus and Caeci