Journals / Arkeoloji ve Sanat / 2020 / Cilt: 163 - Sayı: 163

THE USE OF PLASTER IN THE CHALCOLITHIC ARCHITECTURE OF GÖKÇEADA UĞURLU-ZEYTİNLİK SETTLEMENT

Gökçeada Uğurlu-ZeytinlikYerleşmesi Kalkolitik ÇağMimarisinde Sıva Kullanımı

Pages
39–46
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it is understood that the practices related to the preparation of theplaster do not show a big difference and more than one sources may be used for the constructionof the plasters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper is concerned with the use of plaster in the Chalcolithic levels of the settlement ofGökçeada Uğurlu-Zeytinlik, dating ca. 5500-4900 BC.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The determination of the physicochemicaland mineralogical structure of plasters provides important clues as to how they are prepared, andwhat are the additives in them.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it is understood that the practices related to the preparation of theplaster do not show a big difference and more than one sources may be used for the constructionof the plasters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the use of plaster in the Chalcolithic levels of the settlement ofGökçeada Uğurlu-Zeytinlik, dating ca. 5500-4900 BC. The determination of the physicochemicaland mineralogical structure of plasters provides important clues as to how they are prepared, andwhat are the additives in them. Therefore, it is possible to obtain information about the extent towhich Prehistoric people use the resources or materials around them, and/or how they apply plas ter techniques in different areas of use. In this study, the plaster samples taken from the building,pits found in Chalcolithic levels of the settlement as well as a nearby source were analysed. X-RayFluorescence spectrometer (XRF) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) was used in the analysis ofthe study samples. As a result, it is understood that the practices related to the preparation of theplaster do not show a big difference and more than one sources may be used for the constructionof the plasters.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Gökçeada Uğurlu-Zeytinlik yerleşmesinin MÖ 5500-4900 yıllarına tarihlenen Kalkolitik Çağ tabakalarında ortaya çıkarılmış mimari yapılardaki sıva kullanımıyla ilgilidir. Sıvaların fizikokimyasal ve mineralojik yapılarının belirlenmesi, nasıl hazırlanmış olduklarına ve yapılarında bulunan katkı maddelerine dair önemli ipuçları sağlamaktadır. Dolayısıyla, insanların çevrelerindeki kaynakları ya da materyalleri ne ölçüde ve nasıl kullandıkları ya da farklı kullanım alanlarında nasıl sıva teknikleri uygulamış olduklarına dair bilgilere ulaşmak mümkün olmaktadır. Çalışmada, yerleşimin Kalkolitik tabakalarında ele geçmiş olan bir bina, çukurlar ve kaynaktan alınan sıva örnekleri analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma örneklerinin analizinde X-Ray Floresans spektrometresi (XRF) ve X-Işını Kırınım tekniği (XRD) kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, sıva hazırlamayla ilgili uygulamaların büyük bir değişim göstermediği ve kullanılmış olan sıvaların yapımı için birden fazla kaynağın kullanılmış olabileceği anlaşılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRÇAL, E., ULUBEY, A. (2022). THE USE OF PLASTER IN THE CHALCOLITHIC ARCHITECTURE OF GÖKÇEADA UĞURLU-ZEYTİNLİK SETTLEMENT. Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Cilt: 163 - Sayı: 163, 39–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/448395

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adam, J. E. ve W. A. Kneller 1988. “Thermal Analysis of Medieval Mortars from Gothic Cathedrals of France”, P. G. Marinos ve G. C. Koukis (yay.) Engineering Geology of Ancient Works, Monuments and Historic Sites: 1019-1026.
  2. Balkema, Rotterdam. Akbar, j., B. Alam, M. Ashraf, S. Afzal, A. Ahmad ve K. Shahzada 2013. “Evaluating the Effect of Bentonite on Strength and Durability of High Performance Concrete”, International Journal of Advanced Structures and Geotechnical Engineering 02/01: 1-5.
  3. Chu, V., L. Regev, S. Weiner ve E. Boaretto 2008. “Differentiating Between Anthropogenic Calcite in Plaster, Ash and Natural Calcite using Infrared spectroscopy: Implications in Archaeology”, Journal of Archaeological Science 35/4: 905-911.
  4. Erdoğu, B. 2014. “Gökçeada Uğurlu Archaeological Project: A Preliminary Report from the 2011- 2013 Field Seasons”, Anatolica XL: 157-178.
  5. Franzini, M., Leoni, L. ve Lezzerini, M. 2000. “A Procedure for Determining the Chemical Composition of Binder and Aggregate in Ancient Mortars: Its Application to Mortars from Some Medieval Buildings in Pisa”. Journal of Cultural Heritage 1/4: 365–373.
  6. Kurugöl, S. ve Ç. Tekin 2011. “Evaluation of Sivas Traditional Sweet Plasters”, Gazi University Journal of Science 24/1: 161-173.
  7. Kwon, Y. H., S. H. Kang, S. G. Hong ve J. Moon 2017. “Intensified Pozzolanic Reaction on Kaolinite Clay-Based Mortar”, Appl. Sci. 7/5: 522. Kyonka, J. C. ve R. L. Cook 1954. “The Properties of Feldspars and Their use in Whitewares”, University of Illinois, Engineering Experiment Station Bulletin 422. Illinois. Riccardia, M. P., P. Duminuco, C. Tomasi ve P. Ferloni 1998. “Thermal, Microscopic and X-ray Diffraction Studies on Some Ancient Mortars”, Thermochimica Acta 321/1-2: 207-214.
  8. Singh, M., S. Waghmare ve S. V. Kumar 2014. “Characterization of Lime Plasters used in 16th Century Mughal Monument”, Journal of Archaeological Science 42/1: 430-434.
  9. Stewart, J. ve J. Moore 1982. “Chemical Techniques of Historic Mortar Analysis”, Bulletin of the Association for Preservation Technology 14/1: 11-16.
  10. Uddin, F. 2008. “Clays, “Nanoclays, and Montmorillonite Minerals”, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 39/12: 2804-2814.