SavedAdd your journal

Journals / A+Arch Design International Journal of Architecture and Design / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Disaster Risk Management of Cultural Heritage in Urban Areas: The Case of Turkey

Hande YARAŞAN
Meltem VATAN
Pages
115–136
Publication Date
2020-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, this initial theoretical information background prepared for this paper will provide construction of the framework for both the ‘Comprehensive Theoretical Data Infrastructure Perspectives’ and the ‘Pilot Proposal Field Application Study will be selected in The Historical Peninsula’ within the scope of the author of this paper’s ‘Ph.D.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Within the scope of this paper, a new initial-scale data infrastructure to communicate with ‘Disaster Risk Management’ and ‘Disaster Risk Management of Cultural Heritage in Urban Areas’ is aimed to construct the particular major issues based on selected literature resources (such as the basic terminologies, the main principles, the general development process both in worldwide and Turkey and also the general scaled recommendations etc.).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the scope of this paper, a new initial-scale data infrastructure to communicate with ‘Disaster Risk Management’ and ‘Disaster Risk Management of Cultural Heritage in Urban Areas’ is aimed to construct the particular major issues based on selected literature resources (such as the basic terminologies, the main principles, the general development process both in worldwide and Turkey and also the general scaled recommendations etc.).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, this initial theoretical information background prepared for this paper will provide construction of the framework for both the ‘Comprehensive Theoretical Data Infrastructure Perspectives’ and the ‘Pilot Proposal Field Application Study will be selected in The Historical Peninsula’ within the scope of the author of this paper’s ‘Ph.D.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Disaster Risk Management · Terminology · Cultural Heritage

Abstract

Within the scope of this paper, a new initial-scale data infrastructure to communicate with ‘Disaster Risk Management’ and ‘Disaster Risk Management of Cultural Heritage in Urban Areas’ is aimed to construct the particular major issues based on selected literature resources (such as the basic terminologies, the main principles, the general development process both in worldwide and Turkey and also the general scaled recommendations etc.). Thus, this initial theoretical information background prepared for this paper will provide construction of the framework for both the ‘Comprehensive Theoretical Data Infrastructure Perspectives’ and the ‘Pilot Proposal Field Application Study will be selected in The Historical Peninsula’ within the scope of the author of this paper’s ‘Ph.D. Study’.

🔖

Cite This Article

YARAŞAN, H., VATAN, M. (2020). Disaster Risk Management of Cultural Heritage in Urban Areas: The Case of Turkey. A+Arch Design International Journal of Architecture and Design, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 115–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/448081

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. URL-1, AFAD (2009). Terminoloji. http://www.afad.gov.tr (Access date: 18 March 2009)
  2. URL-2, AFAD (2018). Afet Türleri. https://www.afad.gov.tr/tr/23429/Afet-Turleri (Access date: 13 November 2018)
  3. Ahunbay, Z. (2009). Tarihi Çevre Koruma ve Restorasyon
  4. Edition. İstanbul: YEM Publications
  5. URL-3, Başbakanlık (2014). Resmi Gazete. http://www.resmigazete.org (Access date: 11 November 2014)
  6. URL-4, Başbakanlık Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı (2014). Açıklamalı Afet Yönetimin Terimleri Sözlüğü. https://www.afad.gov.tr/tr/23792/Aciklamali-Afet-Yonetimi-Terimleri-Sozlugu?kelime (Access date: 13 November 2018)
  7. URL-5, Cabbar, Ü. N. & Zıvralı, İ. (2015). Kültür Varlıklarında Risk Yönetimi; Gelişimi, Güncel Durum ve Öneriler
  8. Tarihi Eserlerin Güçlendirilmesi ve Geleceğe Güvenle Devredilmesi Sempozyumu. http://www.imo.org.tr/resimler/ekutuphane/pdf/17506_59_16.pdf (Access date: 17 October 2020)
  9. David, A. (1999). Natural Disasters. Netherlands: Kluver Academic Publishers
  10. URL-6, Dinçer, İ. (2012). Kültür Mirasının Korunmasında Risklere Hazırlık Kavramının Gelişimi. Mimarlık. (364). http://www.mimarlikdergisi.com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSayi=378&-RecID=2906, (Access date: 19 October 2020)
  11. URL-7, FEMA (2005). Integrating Historic Property and Cultural Resource Considerations into Hazard Mitigation Planning. Federal Emergency Management Agency. http://www.fema.gov/environmental-planning-and-historic-preservation-program/integrating-historic-property-cultural (Access date: 22 April 2010)
  12. Gündoğdu, F. D. (2014). Tarihi Çevrelerde Afet Risk Yönetimi İçin Bir Model Önerisi. Thesis for the Ph.D Degree, İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi FBE
  13. URL-8, Güngör, Y. ( - ). Temel Arama ve Kurtarma. İstanbul Üniversitesi Açık ve Uzaktan Eğitim Fakültesi Acil Yardım ve Afet Yönetimi Lisans Tamamlama Programı. http://auzefkitap.istanbul.edu.tr/kitap/acilyardimveafetyonetimi_ao/avakcoys.pdf (Access date: 4 November 2020)
  14. IATF (1997). The Kobe / Tokyo Declaration on Risk Preparedness For Cultural Heritage. Kobe, Japan
  15. URL-9, ICBS (2012). The International Committee of The Blue Shield. http://www.ancbs.org/cms/index.php/en/about-us/about-icbs, (Access date: 12 January 2012)
  16. ICOMOS (1996). 1st National Summit on Heritage & Risk Preparedness, Quebec Declaration. Quebec, Canada
  17. URL-10, ICOMOS (2011). ICOMOS: International Council on Monuments and Sites. http://www.icomos.org/en/about-icomos/mission