SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Archives of Rheumatology / 2021 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3

The mitral valve prolapse frequency in healthy females withgeneralized joint hypermobility: A case-control study

Hande ÖZDEMİR
Nurettin TAŞTEKİN
Filiz TUNA
Derya DEMİRBAĞ KABAYEL
Meryem AKTOZ
Pages
335–340
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Our study results suggest that the frequency of mitral valve prolapse is comparable between the women with generalized jointhypermobility and healthy controls.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of mitral valve prolapse between healthy females with generalized jointhypermobility and healthy controls.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: This observational, cross-sectional, controlled study included female individuals with generalized joint hypermobility(n=39, mean age: 20.5±1.1 years; range, 19 to 23 years) and healthy controls (n=42, mean age: 20.6±1.2 years; range, 18 to 23 years) betweenJuly 2017 and November 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Our study results suggest that the frequency of mitral valve prolapse is comparable between the women with generalized jointhypermobility and healthy controls.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of mitral valve prolapse between healthy females with generalized jointhypermobility and healthy controls. Patients and methods: This observational, cross-sectional, controlled study included female individuals with generalized joint hypermobility(n=39, mean age: 20.5±1.1 years; range, 19 to 23 years) and healthy controls (n=42, mean age: 20.6±1.2 years; range, 18 to 23 years) betweenJuly 2017 and November 2017. The generalized joint hypermobility consisted of women with a Beighton score of ≥4, while the control groupconsisted of women with a Beighton score of ≤3. Echocardiography was performed to all participants. Mitral valve prolapse was defined as havingsingle or bileaflet prolapse of at least 2 mm beyond the long-axis annular plane with or without mitral leaflet thickening. Results: No significant difference was found in the age, height, body weight, and body mass index between the groups (p>0.05). The medianBeighton score was 5 in the generalized joint hypermobility group and 2 in the control group. No mitral valve prolapse was detected in thosewith generalized joint hypermobility, while non-classical mitral valve prolapse was observed in one participant in the control group, indicating nostatistically significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our study results suggest that the frequency of mitral valve prolapse is comparable between the women with generalized jointhypermobility and healthy controls. Based on these results, routine assessment of mitral valve prolapse is not recommended in this population.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, H., TAŞTEKİN, N., TUNA, F., KABAYEL, D. D., AKTOZ, M. (2022). The mitral valve prolapse frequency in healthy females withgeneralized joint hypermobility: A case-control study. Archives of Rheumatology, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3, 335–340. https://ajindex.com/articles/448023

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne CL. Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis 1973;32:413-8
  2. Beighton PH, Grahame R, Bird HA. Hypermobility of joints. 4th ed. London: Springer Science & Business Media; 2011
  3. Castori M, Tinkle B, Levy H, Grahame R, Malfait F, Hakim A. A framework for the classification of joint hypermobility and related conditions. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2017;175:148-57
  4. Castori M, Hakim A. Contemporary approach to joint hypermobility and related disorders. Curr Opin Pediatr 2017;29:640-9
  5. Tuna F. Prevalence of joint hypermobility, hypermobility spectrum disorder and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome in a university population: an observational study. The European Research Journal 2020;6:120-9
  6. Russek LN, Errico DM. Prevalence, injury rate and, symptom frequency in generalized joint laxity and joint hypermobility syndrome in a “healthy” college population. Clin Rheumatol 2016;35:1029-39
  7. Grahame R, Bird HA, Child A. The revised (Brighton 1998) criteria for the diagnosis of benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS). J Rheumatol 2000;27:1777-9
  8. McLachlan J, Reddy PC, Ratts TE. Mitral valve prolapse. A common cardiac diagnosis in women. J La State Med Soc 1998;150:92-6
  9. Delling FN, Vasan RS. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of mitral valve prolapse: new insights into disease progression, genetics, and molecular basis. Circulation 2014;129:2158-70
  10. Handler CE, Child A, Light ND, Dorrance DE. Mitral valve prolapse, aortic compliance, and skin collagen in joint hypermobility syndrome. Br Heart J 1985;54:501-8
  11. Mohammed TJ. Mitral Valve Prolapse In Patients With Benign Joint Hypermobility Syndrome (BJHS). AL-Kindy College Medical Journal 2017;13:8-10
  12. Kozanoglu E, Benlidayi IC, Akilli RE, Tasal A. Is there any link between joint hypermobility and mitral valve prolapse in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome? Clin Rheumatol 2016;35:1041-4
  13. Patel A, Schwartz M, Cohen L, Shindler D, Moreyra A, Schlesinger N. Mitral valve prolapse in patients with joint hypermobility syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2015;67:385-6
  14. Mishra MB, Ryan P, Atkinson P, Taylor H, Bell J, Calver D, et al. Extra-articular features of benign joint hypermobility syndrome. Br J Rheumatol 1996;35:861-6
  15. Jessee EF, Owen DS Jr, Sagar KB. The benign hypermobile joint syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:1053-6
  16. Ondrasík M, Rybár I, Rus V, Bosák V. Joint hypermobility in primary mitral valve prolapse patients. Clin