Journals / Archives of health science and research (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Lower Extremity Muscles Shortness, Flexibility, and Hypermobility in Adults with Asymptomatic Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Pages
21–26
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: This study emphasized that asymptomatic sacroiliac joint dysfunction might be seen in healthy young adults without the difference in shortness and flexibility in the lower extremity and hypermobility.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: (a) To investigate the presence of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in asymptomatic individuals and (b) to compare lower limb muscle shortness, flexibility of hamstring and erector spinae muscles, and hypermobility between subjects with and without asymptomatic sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: A total of 54 healthy young adults subjects were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: This study emphasized that asymptomatic sacroiliac joint dysfunction might be seen in healthy young adults without the difference in shortness and flexibility in the lower extremity and hypermobility.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: (a) To investigate the presence of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in asymptomatic individuals and (b) to compare lower limb muscle shortness, flexibility of hamstring and erector spinae muscles, and hypermobility between subjects with and without asymptomatic sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Material and Methods: A total of 54 healthy young adults subjects were included in the study. The subjects were assessed with the sacroiliac joint diagnostic proce- dure. The seated flexion test, the standing flexion test, the Gillet test, and bilateral bony landmark examination were performed by an expert investigator. According to the positivity of at least 3 of these tests, the subjects were divided into 2 groups, the asymptomatic sacroiliac joint dysfunction group and the control group. The shortness of tensor fasciae latae and iliopsoas muscles was evaluated with the modified Ober test and the modified Thomas test. The straight leg raise test and fingertip-to-floor test were carried out for hamstring and erector spinae muscles flexibility, while hypermobility was assessed according to the Beighton criteria. Results: The asymptomatic sacroiliac joint dysfunction was diagnosed in 38% of healthy adults. There was no statistical difference in the shortness of tensor fas- ciae latae and iliopsoas muscles between the asymptomatic sacroiliac joint dysfunction group and the control group (P > 0.05). Similarly, there was no difference between the groups in terms of the hamstring and erector spinae muscles flexibility, and the Beighton scores (P > 0.05). Conclusion: This study emphasized that asymptomatic sacroiliac joint dysfunction might be seen in healthy young adults without the difference in shortness and flexibility in the lower extremity and hypermobility.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTURAN, K. E., NARİN, A. N., BAHAR, B., CÖMERT, A. V., DAĞLI, B. Y. (2022). Evaluation of Lower Extremity Muscles Shortness, Flexibility, and Hypermobility in Adults with Asymptomatic Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction. Archives of health science and research (Online), Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 21–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/447873

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT, Carreiro JE, Danneels L, Willard FH. The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat. 2012
  2. 221(6):537-567. [CrossRef] 2. Al-Subahi M, Alayat M, Alshehri MA, et al. The effectiveness of physiother- apy interventions for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017
  3. 29(9):1689-1694. [CrossRef] 3. Arab AM, Nourbakhsh MR, Mohammadifar A. The relationship between hamstring length and gluteal muscle strength in individuals with sacro- iliac joint dysfunction. J Man Manip Ther. 2011
  4. 19(1):5-10. [CrossRef] 4. Soleimanifar M, Karimi N, Arab AM. Association between composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint disorders. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017
  5. 21(2):240-245. [CrossRef] 5. Laslett M. Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of the painful sacro- iliac joint. J Man Manip Ther. 2008
  6. 16(3):142-152. [CrossRef] 6. Hamidi-Ravari B, Tafazoli S, Chen H, Perret D. Diagnosis and current treat- ments for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a review. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2014
  7. 2(1):48-54. [CrossRef] 7. Peebles R, Jonas CE. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction in the athlete: diagnosis and management. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2017
  8. 16(5):336-342. [CrossRef] 8. van Wingerden JP, Vleeming A, Buyruk HM, Raissadat K. Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint in vivo: verification of muscular contribution to force closure of the pelvis. Eur Spine J. 2004
  9. 13(3):199-205. [CrossRef] 9. Yoo WG. Effects of individual strengthening exercises for the stabilization muscles on the nutation torque of the sacroiliac joint in a sedentary worker with nonspecific sacroiliac joint pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015
  10. 27(1):313- 314. [CrossRef] 10. Newman DP, McLean BC, Scozzafava AM. Evaluation and management of sacroiliac dysfunction utilizing an evidence-based algorithmic approach: a case study. Cureus. 2020
  11. 12(8):e9907. [CrossRef] 11. Shoukat H, Arshad HS, Sharif F, Fatima A, Shoukat F. Effects of different stretching times on range of motion in patients with hamstring tightness: a randomised control trial. Ann King Edw Med Univ. 2017
  12. 23(4):554-559. [CrossRef] 12. Slipman CW, Whyte WS, Chow DW, Chou L, Lenrow D, Ellen M. Sacroiliac joint syndrome. Pain Phys. 2001
  13. 4(2):143-152. 13. Roussel N, De Kooning M, Schutt A, et al. Motor control and low back pain in dancers. Int J Sports Med. 2013
  14. 34(2):138-143. [CrossRef] 14. Roussel NA, Nijs J, Mottram S, Van Moorsel A, Trui