Journals / Archives of health science and research (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Development of a Balance System Including Virtual Reality Applications for the Evaluation and Improvement of Balance: Physiotherapy–Engineering Cooperation

Pages
70–74
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: When the developed system was compared with the postural stability test of the Biodex Balance System, it was determined that the overall stabil- ity (rho = 0.831 P = .027), forward-backward stability (rho = 0.789 P = .032), and left-right stability (rho = 0.761 P = .037) results showed a good correlation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the study was to develop a balance evaluation and exercise system consisting of virtual reality-based software, which can be an alternative to the costly balance devices available in the market for the purpose of assessing balance and exercising in individuals at risk of falling and examining its effectiveness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then, hardware was added to the developed software and this developed system was tested on 30 healthy individuals (17 women and 13 men) and compared with the valid and reliable Biodex Balance System.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: When the developed system was compared with the postural stability test of the Biodex Balance System, it was determined that the overall stabil- ity (rho = 0.831 P = .027), forward-backward stability (rho = 0.789 P = .032), and left-right stability (rho = 0.761 P = .037) results showed a good correlation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to develop a balance evaluation and exercise system consisting of virtual reality-based software, which can be an alternative to the costly balance devices available in the market for the purpose of assessing balance and exercising in individuals at risk of falling and examining its effectiveness. Methods: In the first stage of the study, software was developed to evaluate balance and make exercise applications by using the balance platform of the Nintendo Wii game console available in the market. Then, hardware was added to the developed software and this developed system was tested on 30 healthy individuals (17 women and 13 men) and compared with the valid and reliable Biodex Balance System. Results: When the developed system was compared with the postural stability test of the Biodex Balance System, it was determined that the overall stabil- ity (rho = 0.831 P = .027), forward-backward stability (rho = 0.789 P = .032), and left-right stability (rho = 0.761 P = .037) results showed a good correlation. It was observed that the measurements made with both devices gave similar results for static postural stability. Conclusions: We believe that the exercise system consisting of virtual reality-based software developed within the scope of the project, which is portable and of low cost with balance assessment and rehabilitative games, can be used safely and effectively in improving balance

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZGAN, Y. Z., OKTAY, A. B., TARAKCI, E. (2022). Development of a Balance System Including Virtual Reality Applications for the Evaluation and Improvement of Balance: Physiotherapy–Engineering Cooperation. Archives of health science and research (Online), Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 70–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/447863

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007
  2. Heinrich S, Rapp K, Rissmann U, Becker C, König HH. Cost of falls in old age: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(6):891-902. [CrossRef] 3. Kerber KA. Vertigo and dizziness in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2009;27(1):39-50, viii. [CrossRef] 4. Kovacs E, Wang X, Grill E. Economic burden of vertigo: a systematic review. Health Econ Rev. 2019;9(1):37. [CrossRef] 5. Williams AD, Boser QA, Kumawat AS, Agarwal K, Rouhani H, Vette AH. Design and evaluation of an instrumented wobble board for assessing and training dynamic seated balance. J Biomech Eng. 2018;140(4). [CrossRef] 6. Yelnik A, Bonan I. Clinical tools for assessing balance disorders. Neuro- physiol Clin. 2008;38(6):439-445. [CrossRef] 7. Huxham FE, Goldie PA, Patla AE. Theoretical considerations in balance assessment. Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(2):89-100. [CrossRef] 8. Postolache OA, Postolache GB. Development and selection of balance sensing devices. IEEE Instrum Meas Mag. 2017;20(1):38-48. [CrossRef] 9. Bet P, Castro PC, Ponti MA. Fall detection and fall risk assessment in older person using wearable sensors: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2019;130:103946. [CrossRef] 10. Hinman MR. Factors affecting reliability of the Biodex Balance System: a summary of four studies. J Sport Rehabil. 2000;9(3):240-252. [CrossRef] 11. Available at: 1https://ww w.bio dex.c om/ph ysica l-med icine /prod ucts/ balan ce/ba lance -syst em-sd. Accessed 9 February 2022
  3. De Smith MJ. Statistical Analysis Handbook A Comprehensive Handbook of Statistical Concepts Techniques and Software Tool. Edinburgh: The Winchel- sea Press, Drumlin Security Ltd; 2018
  4. Olsson F, Halvorsen K, Aberg AC. Neuromuscular controller models for quantifying standing balance in older people: a systematic review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2021;PP:1937. [CrossRef] 14. Chen B, Liu P, Xiao F, Liu Z, Wang Y. Review of the upright balance assess- ment based on the force plate. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2696. [CrossRef] 15. Marques A, Almeida S, Carvalho J, Cruz J, Oliveira A, Jácome C. Reliability, validity, and ability to identify fall status of the balance evaluation sys- tems test, mini–balance evaluation systems test, and brief–balance evalu- ation systems test in older people living in the community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(12):2