Journals / Archives of health science and research (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Readiness for Interprofessional Learning of Undergraduate Midwifery Students in Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study

Pages
55–60
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results demonstrated a remarkable variation between the years of their study in terms of readiness for interprofessional learning (P = .029), teamwork and collaboration (P = .006), and roles and responsibilities (P = .018), and this difference was due to third-grade students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The present study examined the readiness of midwifery students for interprofessional learning and the relationship of it with the years of their study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was done with 250 undergraduate midwifery students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results demonstrated a remarkable variation between the years of their study in terms of readiness for interprofessional learning (P = .029), teamwork and collaboration (P = .006), and roles and responsibilities (P = .018), and this difference was due to third-grade students.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The present study examined the readiness of midwifery students for interprofessional learning and the relationship of it with the years of their study. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was done with 250 undergraduate midwifery students. Using a convenience sample of students, attitudes toward interprofessional learning was measured using 1 standardized instrument: Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc least significant difference’s (LSD) test. Results: The total mean scores of readiness for interprofessional learning were 69.99 ± 15.43. The results demonstrated a remarkable variation between the years of their study in terms of readiness for interprofessional learning (P = .029), teamwork and collaboration (P = .006), and roles and responsibilities (P = .018), and this difference was due to third-grade students. Conclusions: Midwifery students’ level of readiness for interprofessional learning was high and reached the highest value in the third year of their study. The out- comes of the study recommend that the baseline attitudes of students should be taken into consideration by midwifery educators while designing interprofessional education curricula. Interprofessional learning could be integrated into the curriculum of midwifery professional programs which may trigger the students’ ambi- tion to be competent in their profession while comprehending other professions’ roles.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHAN, F. U., KORUCU, A. E. (2022). Readiness for Interprofessional Learning of Undergraduate Midwifery Students in Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study. Archives of health science and research (Online), Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 55–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/447858

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. . Hermasari BK, Rahayu GR, Claramita M. How does portfolio assess inter- professional learning among medical and midwifery students? IJERE. 2019
  2. 8(3):392-400. [CrossRef] 2. World Health Organization (WHO). Strengthening Quality Midwifery Educa- tion for Universal Health Coverage 2030: Framework for Action [Internet]. 2019. Available at: https://ap ps.wh o.int /iris /bits tream /hand le/10 665/3 24738 /9789 24151 5849- eng.p df?ua =1, Accessed August 23, 2021. 3. Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014
  3. 384(9948):1129-1145. [CrossRef] 4. Avery MD, Jennings JC, Germano E, et al. Interprofessional education between midwifery students and obstetrics and gynecology residents: an American College of Nurse‐Midwives and American College of Obstetri- cians and Gynecologists collaboration. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020
  4. 65(2):257-264. [CrossRef] 5. Murray-Davis B, Marshall M, Gordon F. What do midwives think about interprofessional working and learning? Midwifery. 2011
  5. 27(3):376-381. [CrossRef] 6. Murray-Davis B, Marshall M, Gordon F. Becoming an interprofessional practitioner: factors promoting the application of pre-qualification learn- ing to professional practice in maternity care. J Interprof Care. 2014
  6. 28(1):8- 14. [CrossRef] 7. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Safe Births: Everybody’s Business an Independent Inquiry Into the Safety of Maternity Services in England [Internet]. 2008. Available at: https://ww w.kin gsfun d.org.uk/s ites/ defau lt/files/S afe%2 0Birt hs.pd f, Accessed August 23, 2021. 8. Nursing and Midwifery Council. Standards for Pre-Registration Midwifery Education [Internet]. 2009. Available at: http: //www.nmc. org.u k/glo balas sets/ sited ocume nts/s tanda rds/n mc-st andards-fo r-pre regis trati on-mi dwife ry-ed ucati on.pd f, Accessed August 23, 2021. 9. Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education (CAIPE). Defin- ing IPE [Internet]. 2002. Available at: http: //www.caip e.org.uk/about- us/ de finin g-ipe /, Accessed August 23, 2021. 10. Williams B, Boyle M, Brightwell R, et al. A cross-sectional study of para- medics’ readiness for interprofessional learning and cooperation: results from five universities. Nurse Educ Today. 2013
  7. 33(11):1369-1375. [CrossRef] 11. Reeves S, Perrier L, Goldman J, Freeth D, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and hea