SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Aquaculture Studies / 2021 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

Cultural Energy Use and Energy Use Efficiency of a Small-Scale Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum, 1792) Cage Farm in the Inland Waters of Turkey: A Case Study from Karacaören-I Dam Lake

Gürkan DİKEN
İsmail CAN
Hayati KÖKNAROĞLU
Pages
31–40
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed that in order to compare the sustainability of aquaculture production systems energy use efficiency which is an indicator of sustainability should be determined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to assess cultural energy (CE) use and energy use efficiency of a commercial small scale rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) cage farm in the inland waters in Karacaören Dam Lake, Isparta, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data collected for each production year were: number and total weight of fingerlings, amount of feed consumed, amount of antibiotics, vitamin, labor, diesel, oxygen used, number and total weight of marketed trout, distance for transportation of fingerlings, machinery, and equipment with their depreciation rate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed that in order to compare the sustainability of aquaculture production systems energy use efficiency which is an indicator of sustainability should be determined.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess cultural energy (CE) use and energy use efficiency of a commercial small scale rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) cage farm in the inland waters in Karacaören Dam Lake, Isparta, Turkey. Data collected for each production year were: number and total weight of fingerlings, amount of feed consumed, amount of antibiotics, vitamin, labor, diesel, oxygen used, number and total weight of marketed trout, distance for transportation of fingerlings, machinery, and equipment with their depreciation rate. Total CE use was the sum of CE expended on feed, general management, transportation, machinery, and equipment. CE expended on compound diet constituted 77.40% of total CE. CE expended for a kg of liveweight gain was 2.69 Mcal. Protein energy production efficiency in carcass and fillet was 4.30 and 7.49 Mcal, respectively. CE energy use efficiency for carcass and fillet were 4.21 and 6.89, respectively. Results showed that in order to compare the sustainability of aquaculture production systems energy use efficiency which is an indicator of sustainability should be determined.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİKEN, G., CAN, İ., KÖKNAROĞLU, H. (2022). Cultural Energy Use and Energy Use Efficiency of a Small-Scale Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum, 1792) Cage Farm in the Inland Waters of Turkey: A Case Study from Karacaören-I Dam Lake. Aquaculture Studies, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 31–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/447571

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Baird, G., Alcorn, A., & Haslam, P. (1997). The energy embodied in building materials -updated New Zealand coefficients and their significance. IPENZ Transactions, 24(1/CE), 46-54.
  2. Boyd, C.E., Tucker, C., Mcnevin, A., Bostick, K., & Clay, J. (2007). Indicators of resource use efficiency and environmental performance in fish and crustacean aquaculture. Reviews in Fisheries Science, 15(4), 327-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641260701624177
  3. Chatvijitkul, S., Boyd, C.E., Davis, D.A., & McNevin, A.A. (2017). Embodied resources in fish and shrimp feeds. Journal of The World Aquaculture Socıety, 48(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12360
  4. Cahu, C. (2019). Chapter: 2- L'Avenir-, L’aquaculture: quelle réponse à la demande croissante de nourriture dans le monde ? Aquaculture: what response to the growing need for food in the world? In book: Etudes Marines- Nourrir-, Centre d'Etudes Stratégiques de la Marine, 40-49p. Cervinka, V. (1980). Fuel and energy efficiency. In D. Pimentel (Ed.), Handbook of energy utilization in agriculture (p. 15-24).
  5. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-2661-3.
  6. Cook, C.W., Denham, A.H., Bartlett, E.T., & Child, R.D. (1976). Efficiency of converting nutrients and cultural energy in various feeding and grazing systems. Rangeland Ecology & Management/Journal of Range Management Archives, 29(3), 186-191.
  7. Cook, C.W., Denham, A.H., Bartlett, E.T., & Child, R.D. (1976). Efficiency of converting nutrients and cultural energy in various feeding and grazing systems. Rangeland Ecology & Management/Journal of Range Management Archives, 29(3), 186-191.
  8. Cook, C.W., Combs, J.J., & Ward, G.M. (1980). Cultural energy in US beef production. In D. Pimentel (Ed.), Handbook of energy utilization in agriculture p (405-418).
  9. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-2661-3. Çınar İ., & Köknaroğlu, H. (2019). Süt sığırcılığında ırkın sürdürülebilirlik üzerine etkisi. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 14, 143-155.
  10. Davulis, J.P., & Frick, G.E. (1977). Potential for energy conservation in feeding livestock and poultry in the United States. Bulletin New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station, 506. Demircan V., & Koknaroglu, H. (2007). Effect of farm size on sustainability of beef cattle production. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 31, 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v31n01_08 Feedipedia. 2020. Feedipedia: An on-line encyclopedia of animal feeds. Retrieved from https://www.feedipedia.org/ (accessed 04.23.2020) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nati