SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

The effects of gingival biotype on delayed tooth eruption in different age groups: A preliminary cross-sectional study

Berceste GÜLER
Irem BAG
Pages
728–732
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In G3, the patients who have a thin gingival biotype in mandibular arch showed premature eruption.Conclusion: Delayed eruption may be related especially in thick gingival biotype in maxillary arch.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between gingival biotype and delayed eruption using the probe transparency technique in different age groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The hypothesis of the present study is that the thick gingival biotype may lead to delayed eruption.Material and Methods: A total of 131 patients (mean age, 90.21± 27.76 months), including 68 males and 63 females were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In G3, the patients who have a thin gingival biotype in mandibular arch showed premature eruption.Conclusion: Delayed eruption may be related especially in thick gingival biotype in maxillary arch.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between gingival biotype and delayed eruption using the probe transparency technique in different age groups. The hypothesis of the present study is that the thick gingival biotype may lead to delayed eruption.Material and Methods: A total of 131 patients (mean age, 90.21± 27.76 months), including 68 males and 63 females were included in the study. Patients were examined in 3 groups according to their dentition periods: between the ages of 3-5 years in Group 1 (G1), 6-8 years in Group 2 (G2), and 9-12 years in Group 3 (G3). Clinically, the gingival biotype was recorded by probe transparency technique. Dental age of the patients was evaluated according to Demirjian method on digital panoramic radiographs. Statistically the chi-square test was used for analysing between the gingival biotype and delayed eruption.Results: The thick gingival biotype was observed in 88.4% and 79.1% in the maxilla and mandible in G1, respectively. In G2, thick biotype-related maxillary delayed eruption was observed in 35% of patients. In G3, the patients who have a thin gingival biotype in mandibular arch showed premature eruption.Conclusion: Delayed eruption may be related especially in thick gingival biotype in maxillary arch.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLER, B., BAG, I. (2022). The effects of gingival biotype on delayed tooth eruption in different age groups: A preliminary cross-sectional study. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 728–732. https://ajindex.com/articles/447273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Suri L, Gagari E, Vastardis H. Delayed tooth eruption: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. A literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126(4):432-45.
  2. Huber KL, Suri L, Taneja P. Eruption disturbances of the maxillary incisors: a literature review. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;32:221-30.
  3. Parner ET, Heidmann JM, Kjaer I, et al. Biological interpretation of the correlation of emergence times of permanent teeth. J Dent Res 2002;81:451-4.
  4. Svanholt M, Kjaer I. Developmental stages of permanent canines, premolars, and 2nd molars in 244 Danish children. Acta Odontol Scand 2008;66:342-50. Becker A. General Principles Related to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Impacted Teeth. In: Dunitz M, ed. The Orthodontic Treatment of Impacted Teeth. 3rd Edition.
  5. West-Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p.1-9. O’Connell AC, Torske KR. Primary failure of tooth eruption: a unique case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87:714-20.
  6. Tay F, Pang A, Yuen S. Unerupted maxillary anterior supernumerary teeth: report of 204 cases. ASDC J Dent Child 1984;51:289-94.
  7. Katz J, Guelmann M, Barak S. Hereditary gingival fibromatosis with distinct dental, skeletal and developmental abnormalities. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:253-6.
  8. Seibert J, Lindhe J. Textbook of Clinical Periodontology, Esthetics and periodontal therapy. 2nd ed. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard; 1989.
  9. Ochsenbein C, Ross S. A reevaluation of osseous surgery. Dent Clin North Am 1969;13:87-102.
  10. Olsson M, Lindhe J. Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18(1):78-82.
  11. Muller HP, Eger T. Gingival phenotypes in young male adults. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:65-71.
  12. Muller HP, Heinecke A, Schaller N, et al. Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:621-6.
  13. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner J. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 1973;45:211-27.
  14. Karadayi B, Afsin H, Ozaslan A, et al. Development of dental charts according to tooth development and eruption for Turkish children and young adults. Imaging Sci Dent 2014;44:103-13.
  15. Maber M, Liversidge HM, Hector MP. Accuracy of age estimation of radiographic methods using developing teeth. Forensic Sci Int 2006;159:68-73.
  16. Karataş OH, Öztürk F, Dedeoğlu N, et al. Dental age assessment: The applicability of Demirjian method in southwestern of eastern Anatolia region Turkish children. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2012;15:130-37
  17. Fu JH, Yeh CY, Chan HL,