Journals / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

The chemical evaluation of different dental graft materials by energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry technique

Pages
23–29
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cell culture and experimental studies are needed to establish a relationship between the different commercial dental grafts and their regenerative properties.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The physicochemical properties of dental graft materials are very important because they strongly influence the bone regeneration capabilities of biomaterials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The EDX measurement of samples was evaluated at between x85 to x50000 magnification.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cell culture and experimental studies are needed to establish a relationship between the different commercial dental grafts and their regenerative properties.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The physicochemical properties of dental graft materials are very important because they strongly influence the bone regeneration capabilities of biomaterials. The purpose of this study is to investigate the chemical composition and surface energies of white (WPTG) and black porous titanium granules (PTG), bovine bone graft, and equine-derived bone graft through energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX) analysis of the comparison. Methodology: The surface chemical compositions of PTG, WPTG, bovine bone graft and equine-derived bone graft were measured by EDX analysis. All graft materials’ morphologic characteristics, such as particle and granule dimension were evaluated with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The EDX measurement of samples was evaluated at between x85 to x50000 magnification. Results: PTG grafts showed elements of sodium (%8.88±9.98), chlor (2.44±1.96) and aluminum (0.99±0.37) as well as titanium (90.06±11.34) molecule at x5000 magnification. In WPTG, titanium (%34.55±6.41) and oxygen (%65.44±6.42) molecules were detected. EDX analyses have detected the presence of sodium, calcium, and phosphorus in the equinederived and bovine bone graft. Conclusion: It has been found that the PTG surface was not made of pure titanium, it has different chemical molecules at larger magnifications and xenografts exhibited different organic material content. Cell culture and experimental studies are needed to establish a relationship between the different commercial dental grafts and their regenerative properties.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uraz, A., Çetiner, D., Güler, B. (2022). The chemical evaluation of different dental graft materials by energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry technique. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 23–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/539498

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants - a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009;2(3):167-184
  2. Schwarz F, Sahm N, Bieling K, Becker J. Surgical regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis lesions using a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite or a natural bone mineral in combination with a collagen membrane: a four-year clinical follow-up report. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(9):807-814. (Crossref
  3. Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J. 2001;10 Suppl 2:S96-S101. (Crossref
  4. Dimitriou R, Jones E, McGonagle D, Giannoudis PV. Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions. BMC Med. 2011;9:66. (Crossref
  5. Sheikh Z, Brooks PJ, Barzilay O, Fine N, Glogauer M. Macrophages, Foreign Body Giant Cells and Their Response to Implantable Biomaterials. Materials (Basel). 2015;8(9):5671-5701. (Crossref
  6. Williams DF. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2008;29(20):2941-2953. (Crossref
  7. Figueiredo M, Henriques J, Martins G, Guerra F, Judas F, Figueiredo H. Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes--comparison with human bone. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;92(2):409-419. (Crossref
  8. Cooper DM, Thomas CD, Clement JG, Turinsky AL, Sensen CW, Hallgrímsson B. Age-dependent change in the 3D structure of cortical porosity at the human femoral midshaft. Bone. 2007;40(4):957-965. (Crossref
  9. Fabbri M, Celotti GC, Ravaglioli A. Hydroxyapatite-based porous aggregates: physico-chemical nature, structure, texture and architecture. Biomaterials. 1995;16(3):225- 228. (Crossref
  10. Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, Boccaccini AR. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(18):3413-3431. (Crossref
  11. Rabiee SM, Moztarzadeh F, Salimi-Kenari H,Solati-Hashjin M. Preparation and properties of a porous calcium phosphate bone graft substitute. Mater. Sci. Poland. 2007;25(4):1019-1027
  12. Daculsi G, CorreP, Malard O, LeGeros RZ, Goyenvalle E. Performance for bone ingrowth of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic versus bovine bone substitute. Trans Tech Publications Ltd. 2006;309-311:1379-1382. (Crossref
  13. Glowacki J. A review of osteoinductive testing methods and sterilization processes for demineralized bone. Cel