SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5

Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomical variation and pathologies through cone-beam computed tomography in patients with impacted third molars in the maxilla

Numan DEDEOĞLU
Pages
811–816
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, there was a statistically significant difference in the frequency of accessory ostium (p = 0.032) andHaller cells (p = 0.025) between the maxillary sinuses adjacent to the impacted third molar dental arch and the maxillary sinusesadjacent to the erupted third molar dental arch.Conclusion: In the present study, the frequency of accessory ostium and Haller cells in the maxillary sinuses adjacent to impactedthird molar dental arches of the maxilla was found to be lower than in the maxillary sinuses adjacent to erupted third molar dentalarches.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to compare between the frequency of anatomical variation and pathology in the maxillary sinuseshaving the impacted third molars in the maxilla adjacent to the dental arch and the maxillary sinuses adjacent to the dental archhaving the erupted third molars.Material and Methods: A total of 284 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of the maxillary sinuses, 141 of whichare adjacent to the impacted third molar teeth in the maxilla, and 143 of which are adjacent to the erupted third molar teeth, wereretrospectively evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the CBCT images, the pathology, septa, accessory ostium, overpneumatization, Haller cell and teeth rootrelation with sinus were evaluated in each maxillary sinus.Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of pathology (p = 0.402), septa (p = 0.904) andoverpneumatization (p = 0.798) between the maxillary sinuses adjacent to the impacted third molar dental arch and the eruptedthird molar dental arch.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, there was a statistically significant difference in the frequency of accessory ostium (p = 0.032) andHaller cells (p = 0.025) between the maxillary sinuses adjacent to the impacted third molar dental arch and the maxillary sinusesadjacent to the erupted third molar dental arch.Conclusion: In the present study, the frequency of accessory ostium and Haller cells in the maxillary sinuses adjacent to impactedthird molar dental arches of the maxilla was found to be lower than in the maxillary sinuses adjacent to erupted third molar dentalarches.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare between the frequency of anatomical variation and pathology in the maxillary sinuseshaving the impacted third molars in the maxilla adjacent to the dental arch and the maxillary sinuses adjacent to the dental archhaving the erupted third molars.Material and Methods: A total of 284 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of the maxillary sinuses, 141 of whichare adjacent to the impacted third molar teeth in the maxilla, and 143 of which are adjacent to the erupted third molar teeth, wereretrospectively evaluated. In the CBCT images, the pathology, septa, accessory ostium, overpneumatization, Haller cell and teeth rootrelation with sinus were evaluated in each maxillary sinus.Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of pathology (p = 0.402), septa (p = 0.904) andoverpneumatization (p = 0.798) between the maxillary sinuses adjacent to the impacted third molar dental arch and the eruptedthird molar dental arch. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the frequency of accessory ostium (p = 0.032) andHaller cells (p = 0.025) between the maxillary sinuses adjacent to the impacted third molar dental arch and the maxillary sinusesadjacent to the erupted third molar dental arch.Conclusion: In the present study, the frequency of accessory ostium and Haller cells in the maxillary sinuses adjacent to impactedthird molar dental arches of the maxilla was found to be lower than in the maxillary sinuses adjacent to erupted third molar dentalarches.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEDEOĞLU, N. (2022). Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomical variation and pathologies through cone-beam computed tomography in patients with impacted third molars in the maxilla. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5, 811–816. https://ajindex.com/articles/447187

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry, 2nd edition. St.Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1999
  2. Kilic C, Kamburoglu K, Yuksel SP, et al. An assessment of the relationship between the maxillary sinus floor and the maxillary posterior teeth root tips using dental cone-beam computerized tomography. Eur J Dent 2010;4:462-7
  3. Rothamel D, Wahl G, d’HoedtB, et al. Incidence and predictive factors for perforation of the maxillary antrum in op-erations to remove upper wisdom teeth: prospective multicentre study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;45:387-91
  4. Killey HC, Kay LW. Possible sequelae when a tooth or root is dislodged into the maxillary sinus. Br Dent J 1964;21:73-7
  5. Patel M, Down K. Accidental displacement of impacted maxillary third molars. Br Dent J 1994;177:57-9
  6. Dedeoğlu N, Altun O, Bilge O, et al. Evaluation of anatomical variations of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuseswıth cone beam computed tomography. Nobel Med 2017;13:36-41
  7. Ali IK, Sansare K, Karjodkar F, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of accessory maxillary ostium and Haller cells: Prevalence and clinical significance. Imaging Sci Dent 2017;47:33-7
  8. Yenigun A, Fazliogullari Z, Gun C, et al. The effect of the presence of the accessory maxillary ostium on the maxillary sinus.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273 4315-9
  9. Mathew R, Omami G, Hand A, et al. Cone beam CT analysis of Haller cells: prevalence and clinical significance. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20130055
  10. Matthews BL, Burke AJ. Recirculation of mucus via accessory ostia causing chronic maxillary sinus disease. Oto-laryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:422-3 11. Sicher H, Dubrul EL. Oral Anatomy, 3rd edition. St Louis:CV Mosby, 1975
  11. Kalavagunta S, Reddy KT. Extensive maxillary sinus pneumatization. Rhinology 2003;41:113-7
  12. Kruger E, Thomson WM, Konthasinghe P. Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: findings from a populationbased New Zealand longitudinal study. 0Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:150-5
  13. Demirtas O, Harorli A. Evaluation of the maxillary third molar position and its relationship with the maxillary sinus: a CBCT study. Oral Radiol 2016;32:173-9
  14. Lim AAT, Wong CW, Allen JC. Maxillary third molar: patterns of impaction and their relation to oroantral perfora-tion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:1035-9
  15. Pelinsari LJ, Moura Rodrigues CP, deCarvalho M, et al. Anatomic variations and lesions of the maxillary sinus detect-ed in cone beam computed tomography for