SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Balıkesir Medical Journal / 2017 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3

THE EVALUATION OF THE RETAINED ROOT FRAGMENTS IN THE JAW BONES OF THE TURKISH POPULATION: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

TÜRK POPULASYONUN DA ÇENE KEMİKLERİNDE KALMIŞ KÖK PARÇALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: RETROSPEKTİF ÇALIŞMA

Numan DEDEOĞLU
Şuayip Burak DUMAN
Oğuzhan ALTUN
Pages
66–71
Publication Date
2017-12-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In 7.14% of them an extraction procedure was necessary.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the retained root fragments on the toothless spaces, in a group of patients living in Turkey, by examining the files and panoramic radiographies of the patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Method: 248 patients were included into this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In 7.14% of them an extraction procedure was necessary.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Panoramik Radyografi · Kalmış Kök · Retrospektif

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the retained root fragments on the toothless spaces, in a group of patients living in Turkey, by examining the files and panoramic radiographies of the patients. Materials and Method: 248 patients were included into this study. Totally 2022 toothless spaces were examined on panoramic radiographs retrospectively. Data about the patients was also obtained from the patients’ files. Frequency of the retained root fragments in the toothless area and their distribution according to the presence on the upper or lower jaw, anterior-premolar and molar areas and the sex of the patient were evaluated on the panoramic radiographs. The patient files were also evaluated to determine whether an extraction is necessary.Result: Totally 56 (2.8 %) remained tooth fragments were found on the 2022 toothless area. No statistically significant was found in terms of frequency of their occurrence on the upper and lower jaws. Remained tooth fragments were found statistically more frequent in females than the males and in the molar area than the anterior-premolar (p<0.05) area. 4 (7.14%) out of 56 remained root fragments needed to be extracted. Conclusion: The frequency of retained tooth fragments was found as 2.8% on the toothless area that resulted from tooth extraction. Retained root fragments were seen more in women and in molar region. In 7.14% of them an extraction procedure was necessary.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye de yaşayan bir grup hastanın panoramik radyografileri ve hasta dosyaları incelenerek dişsiz boşluklarda yer alan kalmış kök parçalarını retrospektif olarak değerlendirmektir.Gereç ve yöntem: Bu çalışmada 248 hastaya ait panoramik radyografide 2022 dişsiz boşluk ve hasta dosyaları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Panoramik radyografilerde dişsiz boşluklarda kalmış diş kökü parçalarının görülme sıklığı, kalmış köklerin alt ve üst çeneye, anterior-premolar ve molar bölgeye ve cinsiyetlere göre dağılımı değerlendirildi. Ayrıca panoramik radyografide kalmış kök parçası tespit edilen hasta dosyaları değerlendirilerek çekim işlemi gerekip gerekmediği de değerlendirildi.Bulgular: 2022 dişsiz boşlukta 56 (%2,8) kalmış kök parçası bulundu. Kalmış kök parçalarının alt ve üst çenede görülme sıklığı açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık bulunmadı (p˃0,05). Molar bölgede anterior-premolar bölgeye göre, kadın hastalarda erkeklere göre kalmış kök parçasının istatistiksel olarak daha fazla bulunduğu tespit edildi (p˂0,05). 56 kalmış kök parçasından 4 (%7,14)’ün de çekim işlemi gerektiği görüldü. Sonuç: Diş çekimi sonucu oluşan dişsiz boşluklarda kalmış kök parçası görülme sıklığı % 2,8 olarak bulundu. Kalmış kök parçaları molar bölgede ve kadınlarda daha fazla görüldü. Kalmış kök parçalarının % 7,14’ünde çekim işlemi gerekli görüldü.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEDEOĞLU, N., DUMAN, Ş. B., ALTUN, O. (2017). THE EVALUATION OF THE RETAINED ROOT FRAGMENTS IN THE JAW BONES OF THE TURKISH POPULATION: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. Balıkesir Medical Journal, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3, 66–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/76156

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Simon E., Matee M. Post-extraction complications seen at a referral dental clinic in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Int Dent J 2001 51: 273–276
  2. Nayyar J, Clarke M, O'Sullivan M, Stassen LF. Fractured root tips during dental extractions and retained root fragments. A clinical dilemma? Br Dent J. 2015;218(5):285-290
  3. Avsever, H., Gunduz, K., Orhan, K., Canitezer, G., Piskin, B., & Akyol, M. Prevalence of edentulousness, prosthetic need and panoramic radiographic findings of totally and partially edentulous patients in a sample of Turkish population. J Exp Integr Med●2014 Jul-Sep, 4(3), 221
  4. Miloglu Ö., Yaşa D.Y., Güngör H. Panoramic radiographic examination in a group of edentulous patients. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni. 2012; 22(3): 230-4
  5. Haştar E, Yılmaz HH, Orhan H. Dişsiz yaşlı hastalarda panoramik radyografi bulguları. S.D.Ü. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 2010;1(2):82-87 6. Mehdizade M, Seydemir H. The survey of panoramic radiographic findings in edentulous patients in Isfahan city. J Isfahan Dent Sch 2005;1:63-5
  6. Edgerton M, Clark P. Location of abnormalities in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;71:106-9
  7. Sumer AP, Sumer M, Güler AU, Biçer I. Panoramic radiographic examination of edentulous mouths. Quintessence Int 2007;38:e399-403
  8. Jindal SK, Sheikh S, Kulkarni S, Singla A. Significance of pre-treatment panoramic radiographic assessment of edentulous patients – A survey. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e600-6
  9. Ardakani FE, Azam AR. Radiological findings in panoramic radiographs of Iranian edentulous patients. Oral Radiol 2007;23:1-5
  10. Axelsson G. Orthopantomographic examination of the edentu¬lous mouth. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:592-8
  11. Smith R L. The role of epithelium in the healing of experimental extraction wounds. J Dent Res 1958; 37: 187–194
  12. Pietrokovski J. Extraction wound healing after tooth fracture in rats. J Dent Res 1967; 46: 232–240
  13. Glickman I, Pruzansky S, Ostrach M. The healing of extraction wounds in the presence of retained root remnants and bone fragments: an experimen¬tal study. Am J Orthodontics Oral Surg 1947; 33: 263–283
  14. Herd J R. The retained tooth root. Aust Dent J 1973; 18: 125–131
  15. Helsham R W. Some observations on the subject of roots of teeth retained in the jaws as a result of incomplete exodontia. Aust Dent J 1960; 5: 70–77.