Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5

Being a hemodialysis patient. Is it a disruption in life?

Pages
778–782
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, the language of the questionnaire is simplified.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The restrictions of the renal replacement therapy affect the quality of life of patients diagnosed with End Stage Renal Disease(ESRD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Herein, we described the perception ofthe hemodialysis (HD) patients to define the social support to increase the life quality.Material and Methods: We included 378 (190 females; 188 males) patients in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, the language of the questionnaire is simplified.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The restrictions of the renal replacement therapy affect the quality of life of patients diagnosed with End Stage Renal Disease(ESRD). The struggle of surviving with the chronic illness brings the need for social support. Herein, we described the perception ofthe hemodialysis (HD) patients to define the social support to increase the life quality.Material and Methods: We included 378 (190 females; 188 males) patients in the study. The patients were attending HD sessions forat least six months. Social relations after ESRD diagnosis were evaluated with a questionnaire. A pilot study of the questionnaire wasexecuted at HD centers of Başkent University. According to the results, the language of the questionnaire is simplified. Data wereanalyzed by SPSS software version 16.Results: The mean age was 54±16.5 years. Half them had primary school education (54%), where the majority was women. Theeffect of the HD treatment on the social life was statistically significant in both male and female patients. The percentage of rise inthe expectation from the partner (50%) and failing at the family liabilities (45.7%), were higher in male patients. In both gender, thehighest percentage was the rise in the expectation from the relatives ( females 63.7%; males 66%). The effect of the HD treatmenton social and work life found to be changed according to the level of education. As the level of education increased, the percentageof loneliness and social isolation increased. Among all components of social life the need of the partner support was the highest(43.4%).Conclusion: ESRD patients have a life full of disruptions starting from the first day of diagnosis. Being dependent to a health facilityand living with dietary restrictions make their life more unbearable and bring the need for support by all means

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDAL, R., SOY, E. H. A., OZDEMİR, A. A. (2022). Being a hemodialysis patient. Is it a disruption in life?. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5, 778–782. https://ajindex.com/articles/447168

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Gerogianni S, Babatsikou F, et al. Social aspects of renal failure in patients undergoing haemodialysis. Int J Caring Sci 2014;7:740-45
  2. Kimmel P, Patel SS. Quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease. Focus on the end-stage renal disease treated with hemodialysis. Semin Nephrol 2006;26:68-79
  3. Patel SS, Peterson RA, Kimmel PL. The impact of social support on end-stage renal disease. Semin Dial 2005;18:98- 102
  4. Kimmel PL, Emont L, Newmann JM, et al. ESRD patient quality of life: Symptoms, spiritual beliefs, psychosocial factors, and ethnicity. Am J Kidney Dis 2003;42:713-21
  5. Patel S, Shah VS, Peterson RA, et al. Psychosocial variables, quality of life, and religious beliefs in ESRD patients treated with hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;40:1013-22
  6. Kimmel PL. Psychosocial factors in dialysis patients. Kidney Int 2001;59:1599-613
  7. Kimmel PL, Peterson RA, Weihs KL, et al. Multiple measurements of depression predict mortality in a longitudinal study of chronic hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2000;57:2093-98
  8. Kimmel PL, Peterson RA, Weihs KL, et al. Psychological functioning, quality of life, and behavioral compliance in patients beginning hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996;7:2152-59. 9. Μuehrer JR, Schatell D, Witten B, et al, M. Factors affecting employment at initiation of dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;6:489-96
  9. Dingwall R. Living with renal failure: the psychological issues. Edtna Erca J 1997;4:30-5
  10. Pruchno AR, Wilson-Genderson M, Cartwright PF. Depressive symptoms and marital satisfaction in the context of chronic disease: A longitudinal dyadic analysis. J Am Psychol 2009;23:573-84
  11. Sprangers MA, De Regt EB, Andries F. Which chronic conditions are associated with better or poorer quality of life? J Clinl Epidemiol 2000;53:895-907
  12. Zyga S. Chronic kidney disease and quality of life. 9th Panhellenic Conference of Public Health, Athens, Greece 26-28.03.2012 14. Lin CC, Lee BO, Hicks FD. The phenomenology of deciding about hemodialysis among taiwanese. West J Nurs Res 2005;27:915-29
  13. Blake C, Codd MB, Cassidy A, et al. Physical function, employment and quality of life in end-stage renal disease. J Nephrol 2000;13:142-9
  14. Theofilou P. Quality of life and chronic end stage renal failure: a qualitative analysis. Interdisciplinary Health Care 2011;3:70-80
  15. Ryan RM, Brown KW. Why we don’t need selfesteem: On fundamental needs, contingent love, and mindfulness. PsycholInq 2003;14:71-6