SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 10

The effects of diabetes mellitus on peri-implant marginal bone loss in the posterior maxilla

Mustafa KARACA
Mustafa Ozay USLU
Arife SABANCI
Pages
2224–2232
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Student-t test and Mann Whitney-U test were used to analyse any significantdifferences between two groups (p0.05).Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was shown that long-term follow-up results of dental implants in well-controlleddiabetic patients were similar to those of healthy individuals and DM did not increase the peri-implant marginal bone loss.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effects of Diabetes Mellitus on peri-implant marginal alveolar bone lossin sinus lifted well-controlled diabetic patients at long term.Materials and Methods: Thirty eight patients with 77 dental implants were included the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study consists of 2 groups;control group (C) and diabetes mellitus group (DM).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Student-t test and Mann Whitney-U test were used to analyse any significantdifferences between two groups (p0.05).Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was shown that long-term follow-up results of dental implants in well-controlleddiabetic patients were similar to those of healthy individuals and DM did not increase the peri-implant marginal bone loss.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effects of Diabetes Mellitus on peri-implant marginal alveolar bone lossin sinus lifted well-controlled diabetic patients at long term.Materials and Methods: Thirty eight patients with 77 dental implants were included the study. The study consists of 2 groups;control group (C) and diabetes mellitus group (DM). The dental implants were placed after open window maxillary sinus liftingsurgery at maxillary posterior region. After conventional loading process patients were followed periodically for bone loss andclinical parameters. The peri-implant marginal bone loss was assessed at minimum 3 years after functional loading. Standardizedpanoramic radiographs were obtained at the baseline and maintenance which were used for evaluating the marginal bone loss andclinical and anatomical crown to implant ratio. The Student-t test and Mann Whitney-U test were used to analyse any significantdifferences between two groups (p0.05).Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was shown that long-term follow-up results of dental implants in well-controlleddiabetic patients were similar to those of healthy individuals and DM did not increase the peri-implant marginal bone loss.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACA, M., USLU, M. O., SABANCI, A. (2022). The effects of diabetes mellitus on peri-implant marginal bone loss in the posterior maxilla. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 10, 2224–2232. https://ajindex.com/articles/446999

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Wang F, Song YL, Li DH, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus impairs bone healing of dental implants in GK rats. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010;88:7-9
  2. Abu Hantash RO, Al-Omiri MK, Al-Wahadni AM. Psychological impact on implant patients’ oral health-related quality of life. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:116-23
  3. Fiorellini JP, Nevins ML. Dental implant considerations in the diabetic patient. Periodontol 2000;23:73-7
  4. Morris HF, Winkler S, Ochi S. The ankylos endosseous dental implant: assessment of stability up to 18 months with the Periotest. J Oral Implantol 2000;26:291-9
  5. Krause A, Cowles EA, Gronowicz G. Integrin-mediated signaling in osteoblasts on titanium implant materials. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;52:738-47
  6. Nevins ML, Karimbux NY, Weber HP, et al. Wound healing around endosseous implants in experimental diabetes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:620-9
  7. Persson GR, Renvert S. Cluster of bacteria associated with peri-implantitis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:783- 93
  8. Misch CE. Divisions of available bone in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implantol 1990;7:9-17
  9. Naert IE, Duyck JA, Hosny MM, et al. Freestanding and toothimplant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients Part II: An up to 15-years radiographic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:245-51
  10. Gomez-Polo M, Bartens F, Sala L, et al. The correlation between crown-implant ratios and marginal bone resorption: a preliminary clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:33-7
  11. Grossmann Y, Sadan A. The prosthodontic concept of crown-to-root ratio: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:559-62
  12. Adell R. Tissue integrated prostheses in clinical dentistry. Int Dent J 1985;35:259-65
  13. Rasmusson L, Meredith N, Sennerby L. Measurements of stability changes of titanium implants with exposed threads subjected to barrier membrane induced bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:316-22
  14. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med 1998;15:539-53
  15. Sesma N, Garaicoa-Pazmino C, Zanardi PR, et al. Assessment of Marginal Bone Loss around PlatformMatched and Platform-Switched Implants - A Prospective Study. Braz Dent J 2016;27:712-6
  16. Dinato TR, Grossi ML, Teixeira ER, et al. Marginal Bone Loss