Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4

Folfirinox versus gemcitabine-cisplatin combination as first-line therapy in treatment of pancreaticobiliary cancer

Pages
1727–1732
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The primary endpoints were progression-free and overall survival time.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The purpose of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of a combination chemotherapy regimen consisting of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine-cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Pancreaticobiliary cancer patients who had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1 (on a scale of 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater severity of illness) were evaluated to receive folfirinox or gemcitabine plus cisplatin.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The primary endpoints were progression-free and overall survival time.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The purpose of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of a combination chemotherapy regimen consisting of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine-cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer. Materials and methods: Pancreaticobiliary cancer patients who had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1 (on a scale of 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater severity of illness) were evaluated to receive folfirinox or gemcitabine plus cisplatin. The primary endpoints were progression-free and overall survival time. Safety analysis was also evaluated as secondary measures. Results: There were 32 patients in the folfirinox group and 36 patients in the gemcitabine-cisplatin group. The median overall survival was 18.1 months (7.5–28.7) in the folfirinox group as compared with 9.7 months (6.5–13) in the gemcitabine-cisplatin group (p = 0.009). Median progression-free survival was 16.2 months (9–23.4) in the folfirinox group and 6.9 months (6.1–7.6) in the gemcitabinecisplatin group (p = 0.001).Conclusion: Folfirinox is an option for the first-line treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer and good performance status.Key words: Pancreatic cancer, folfirinox, gemcitabine-cisplatin, effectiveness, side effect

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZET, A., YAPAR, D., SATIŞ, H., KAYAHAN, N., KARACA, M. (2022). Folfirinox versus gemcitabine-cisplatin combination as first-line therapy in treatment of pancreaticobiliary cancer. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4, 1727–1732. https://ajindex.com/articles/609399

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2013
  2. 63(1): 11-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166 2. Aroldi F, Bertocchi P, Savelli G, Rosso E, Zaniboni A. Pancreatic cancer: New hopes after first line treatment. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology 2016
  3. 8(9): 682-687. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i9.682 3. Asuthkar S, Rao JS, Gondi CS. Drugs in preclinical and earlystage clinical development for pancreatic cancer. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 2012
  4. 21(2): 143-152. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2012.651124 4. Heinemann V, Haas M, Boeck S. Systemic treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Treatment Reviews 2012
  5. 38(7): 843-853. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.12.004 5. Wang YH, Zhang GF, Qian Q, Ning T, Jun G et al. Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus erlotinib for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2016
  6. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S105442 6. Rothenberg M, Moore MJ, Cripps MC, Andersen JS, Portenoy RK et al. A phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with 5-FUrefractory pancreas cancer. Annals of Oncology, 1996
  7. 7(4): 347-353. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010600 7. Burris HRM, Malcolm J, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenborg ML et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1997
  8. 15(6): 2403-2413. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.1997.15.6.2403 8. Suker MB, Berend R, Sadot E, Marthey L, Faris JE et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. The Lancet Oncology 2016
  9. 17(6): 801-810. doi: 10.1016/S1470- 2045(16)00172-8 9. Ciliberto DB, Cirino C, Pierpaolo, Rossi M, Caraglia M et al. Role of gemcitabine-based combination therapy in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised trials. European Journal of Cancer 2013
  10. 49(3): 593-603. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.019 10. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). European Journal of Cancer 2009
  11. 45(2): 228-247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 11. Colucci G, Francesco G, Vittorio G, Biglietto M, Rabitti P et al. Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: A