Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5

Parameters associated with survival in patients undergoing surgical treatment due to rectal cancer

Pages
837–844
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to pTNMstaging, 6 patients (8%) were at stage-0, 7 (10%) were at stage-I, 22 (32%) were at stage-II, 26 (37%) were at stage-III, and 9 (13%)were at stage IV.Conclusion: We found that the ASA (American society of Anesthesiologists) score height, final stage of the tumor and vascular(venous) invasion associated with overall survival

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer.Approximately 1/3 of colorectal cancers are rectum cancers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thepercentage of local disease stage is 39%, and the 10-year survival rate in such patients is approximately 90%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to pTNMstaging, 6 patients (8%) were at stage-0, 7 (10%) were at stage-I, 22 (32%) were at stage-II, 26 (37%) were at stage-III, and 9 (13%)were at stage IV.Conclusion: We found that the ASA (American society of Anesthesiologists) score height, final stage of the tumor and vascular(venous) invasion associated with overall survival
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer.Approximately 1/3 of colorectal cancers are rectum cancers. Thepercentage of local disease stage is 39%, and the 10-year survival rate in such patients is approximately 90%. The aim of our studywas to evaluate the relationship between the clinicopathological characteristics and survival of patients with rectal cancer.Material and Methods: Patients who had undergone surgical treatment for rectal cancer in our clinic between January 2008 andDecember 2013 were evaluated retrospectively. The effects of clinicopathological parameters of these patients on survival wereinvestigated. The preoperative and postoperative variables were evaluated together with survival data.Results: Of the 70 patients, 30 (43%) were females and 40 (57%) were males. The median age was 61 years (min-max = 29-87 years).Eight of the patients (6%) were operated under emergency conditions due to acute abdomen or ileus. 13 (19%) of the patients hadundergone laparoscopic surgery and 57 (81%) had undergone open surgical resection. 15 patients (21%) had undergone anteriorresection (AR), 51 (73%) had lower anterior resection (LAR) and 4 (6%) had abdomino-perineal resection (APR). According to pTNMstaging, 6 patients (8%) were at stage-0, 7 (10%) were at stage-I, 22 (32%) were at stage-II, 26 (37%) were at stage-III, and 9 (13%)were at stage IV.Conclusion: We found that the ASA (American society of Anesthesiologists) score height, final stage of the tumor and vascular(venous) invasion associated with overall survival

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABULUT, K., SARAC, M., İFLAZOĞLU, N., GURSUL, S. (2022). Parameters associated with survival in patients undergoing surgical treatment due to rectal cancer. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5, 837–844. https://ajindex.com/articles/446989

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Boyle P, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004. Ann Oncol 2005;16:481-8
  2. Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:271-89
  3. SEER Stat Fact Sheet; colon and rectum. National Cancer Institute http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect. html access date 28.06.2016 4. Nasiri S, Donboli K, Meysamie A, et al. Prognostic factors in survival of colorectal cancer patients after surgery. Colorectal Disease 2008;11:157-61
  4. Moghimi-Dehkordi B, Safaee A, Zali MR. Prognostic factors in 1,138 Iranian colorectal cancer patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23:683-8
  5. Ragg JL, Watters DA, Guest GD. Preoperative risk stratiication for mortality and major morbidity in major colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52:1296-303 7. Gallina S, Proposito D, Veltri S, et al. Colorectal cancer surgery. Analysis of risk factors in relation to incidence of morbidity and mortality. Chir Ital 2006;58:723-32
  6. Carpelan-Holmström M, Louhimo J, Stenman UH, et al. Estimating the probability of cancer with several tumor markers in patients with colorectal disease. Oncology 2004;66:296-302
  7. Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, et al. ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:5313-27
  8. Andreola S, Leo E, Belli F, et al. Manual dissection of adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum specimens for detection of lymph node metastases smaller than 5 mm. Cancer 1996;77:607-12
  9. Park YJ, Park KJ, Park JG, et al. Prognostic factors in 2230 Korean colorectal cancer patients: analysis of consecutively operated cases. World J Surg 1999;23:721-26
  10. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations available online at http: //www.nccn.org/ professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp access date 15.12.2018 13. Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, et al. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution mr ımaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology 2003;227:371-77
  11. Meyenberger C, HuchBöni RA, Bertschinger P, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Endoscopy 1995;27:469-79
  12. Valentini V, Glimelius B, Minsky BD. The multidisciplinary rectal cancer treatment: main convergences, controversial aspects and investigational areas which