Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

HPV types and E6/E7 mRNA expression in cervical samples from Turkish women with abnormal cytology in Ankara, Turkey

Pages
194–200
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The E6/E7 mRNA test is a robust indicator of cytological atypia and correlates better with progressive lesions than DNA assays.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Human papillomaviruses have been established as a risk factor for invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
📊
Key Findings & Data:HPV E6/ E7 oncogene expression has recently emerged as a promising biomarker to determine the risk for progression to high-grade cervical lesions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The E6/E7 mRNA test is a robust indicator of cytological atypia and correlates better with progressive lesions than DNA assays.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 · 73 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Human papillomaviruses have been established as a risk factor for invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. HPV E6/ E7 oncogene expression has recently emerged as a promising biomarker to determine the risk for progression to high-grade cervical lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate HPV mRNA and DNA detection in samples with abnormal cytology. Materials and methods: Cervical specimens were obtained at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology via cervical brushes during January October 2011. Liquid-based cytology slides were evaluated according to the 2001 Bethesda System. Cytology specimens from a total of 81 women with abnormal cytology were included. Real-time PCR and NASBA assays were performed to detect HPV DNA and E6/E7 mRNA, respectively. Results: HPV DNA was identified in 73 samples (90.1%). HPV E6/E7 mRNA expression was observed in 45 samples (55.6%). A statistically significant difference was observed among cytological diagnosis groups. In 25 patients, a biopsy was performed during the follow-up. HPV DNA was detected in all of these patients. HPV E6/E7 expression was present only in CIN I III diagnosed patients. Conclusion: The E6/E7 mRNA test is a robust indicator of cytological atypia and correlates better with progressive lesions than DNA assays.

🔖

Cite This Article

SALMAN, M. C., ERGÜNAY, K., USUBÜTÜN, A., KARABULUT, E., PINAR, A., ÖNDER, S. Ç., ALTAY, A., BOZDAYI, G., BADUR, O. S., TÜNEY, İ., YÜCE, K. (2022). HPV types and E6/E7 mRNA expression in cervical samples from Turkish women with abnormal cytology in Ankara, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, 194–200. https://ajindex.com/articles/610621

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Zur Hausen H. Papillomaviruses causing cancer: evasion from host cell control in early events in carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 690-698. 2. de Villiers EM, Fauquet C, Broker TR, Bernard HU, Zur Hausen H. Classification of papillomaviruses. Virology 2004; 324: 17-27
  2. Schiffman MH, Bauer HM, Hoover RN, Glass AG, Cadell DM, Rush BB, Scott DR, Sherman ME, Kurman RJ, Wacholder S et al. Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 958-64
  3. Muñoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S, Herrero R, Castellsagué X, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ; International Agency for Research on Cancer Multicenter Cervical Cancer Study Group. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 518- 527
  4. Woodman CB, Collins S, Winter H, Bailey A, Ellis J, Prior P, Yates M, Rollason TP, Young LS. Natural history of cervical human papillomavirus infection in young women: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet 2001; 357: 1831-1836
  5. Cuschieri KS, Whitley MJ, Cubie HA. Human papillomavirus type specific DNA and RNA persistence-implications for cervical disease progression and monitoring. J Med Virol 2004; 6: 1-6
  6. Schlecht NF, Kulaga S, Robitaille J, Ferreira S, Santos M, Miyamura RA, Duarte-Franco E, Rohan TE, Ferenczy A, Villa LL et al. Persistent human papillomavirus infection as a predictor of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. JAMA 2001; 286: 3106-3114
  7. Nalliah S, Karikalan B, Kademane K. Multifaceted usage of HPV related tests and products in the management of cervical cancer – a review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 16: 2145-2150
  8. Boulet GA, Horvath CA, Berghmans S, Bogers J. Human papillomavirus in cervical cancer screening: important role as biomarker. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17: 810- 817
  9. Castle PE, Stoler MH, Wright TC, Sharma A, Wright TL, Behrens CM. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 880-890
  10. Woodman CB, Collins S, Young LS. The natural history of cervical HPV infection: unresolved issues. Nat Rev Cancer 2007; 7: 11-22
  11. Zur Hausen H. Papillomaviruses and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2: 342-350
  12. Castle PE, Dockter J, Giachetti C, Garcia FAR