Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 11

Association of laryngopharyngeal reflux with nasal obstruction

Pages
2689–2693
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Upright, supine and total reflux episodes of patients in the study group were found higher than the controlgroup and these differences reached statistically significant in two groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the effect of nasal obstruction on the laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).Material and Methods: Between April 2013 and October 2014, 40 patients with a diagnosis of nasal septum deviation and 40 controlswith no signs and symptoms of reflux were prospectively included in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the evaluation, two different criteria, based on reflux number and time spent in reflux were used.Results: The proximal canal reflux episode ratios were found 3.0±4.18, 2.05±3.81 and 5.05±7.35 for upright, supine and totally inthe study group respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Upright, supine and total reflux episodes of patients in the study group were found higher than the controlgroup and these differences reached statistically significant in two groups (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of nasal obstruction on the laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).Material and Methods: Between April 2013 and October 2014, 40 patients with a diagnosis of nasal septum deviation and 40 controlswith no signs and symptoms of reflux were prospectively included in this study. Results of pH monitoring of two groups of patientswere analyzed for LPR. In the evaluation, two different criteria, based on reflux number and time spent in reflux were used.Results: The proximal canal reflux episode ratios were found 3.0±4.18, 2.05±3.81 and 5.05±7.35 for upright, supine and totally inthe study group respectively. These ratios were found 0.94±0.29, 0.0±0.0 and 0.94±0.29 for upright, supine and totally in the controlgroup respectively. Upright, supine and total reflux episodes of patients in the study group were found higher than the controlgroup and these differences reached statistically significant in two groups (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKAR, H., BERÇİN, S., SEVİL, E., KIRIŞ, M. (2022). Association of laryngopharyngeal reflux with nasal obstruction. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 11, 2689–2693. https://ajindex.com/articles/446979

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Gilani S, Quan SF, Pynnonen MA, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and gastroesophageal reflux: a multivariate population-level analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;154:390-95
  2. Weldon DR. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and sinusitis: their role in patients with chronic cough. Allergy Asthma Proc 2006;27:36-44
  3. Irwin RS, French CL, Curley FJ, et al. Chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux. Clinical, diagnostic, and pathogenetic aspects. Chest 1993;104:1511-7
  4. Akbulut S, Aydinli FE, Kuscu O, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish reflux symptom index. J Voice 2019;1997:30139
  5. Bercin S, Kutluhan A, Yurttas V, et al. Evaluation of laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux, chronic otitis media and laryngeal disorders. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008;265:1539-43
  6. Singh P, Taylor RH, Coline- Jones DG. Simultaneous two level oesophageal PH monitoring in healthy controls and patients with oesophagitis: comparison between two positions. Gut 1994;35:304-8
  7. Lewin JS, Gillenwater AM, Garrett JD, et al. Characterization of laryngopaharyngeal reflux in patients with premalignant or early carcinomas of the larynx. Cancer 2003;15:1010-4
  8. Pohl D, Tutuian R, Reflux monitoring: pH-metry. Bilitec and oesophageal impedance measurements. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2009;23:299-311
  9. Ciorba A, Bianchini C, Zuolo M, et al. Upper aerodigestive tract disorders and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. World J Clin Cases 2015;3:102-11
  10. Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Symptoms and findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Ear Nose Throat J 2002;81:10-13
  11. Park KH, Choi SM. Diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux among globus patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:81-5
  12. Printza A, Kyrgidis A, Oikonomidou E, et al. Assessing laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms with the Reflux Symptom Index: validation and prevalence in the Greek population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;145:974-80
  13. Lechien JR, Finck C, Costa de Araujo P, et al. Voice outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: a systematic review of 1483 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:1-23
  14. Johnson LF, Demeester TR. 24-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 1974;62:25-32
  15. Kendall KA. Controversies in the diagnosis and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;14:113-5
  16. Smith CF, Tan J. Ambulatory pH m