Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 6

What is the optimum time to decompressive surgery in the patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction?

Pages
1045–1051
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This issue is especially important, because earlier or later interventions not only have aless benefit on the outcome but also may lead several unnecessary complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In the patients with malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarctions, the mortality was as high as 70% with conservativetreatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Decompressive craniectomy (DC) was shown to decrease mortality especially in 48 hours.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This issue is especially important, because earlier or later interventions not only have aless benefit on the outcome but also may lead several unnecessary complications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In the patients with malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarctions, the mortality was as high as 70% with conservativetreatment. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) was shown to decrease mortality especially in 48 hours. We aimed to investigate boththe effect of decompression time and the size of craniectomy on the mortality in this patient group.Material and Methods: 45 adult patients underwent to DC due to malignant MCA infarction were evaluated in this study. Thedemographic and clinical features were recorded retrospectively. The patients were splitted into three groups: Group 1, DC in the first24 hours; group 2, in 24-48th hours; group3, in 48-96th hours of the admission. The size of craniectomy was the same as the infarct(standard), or it was two centimeters larger than the size of infarct (larger).Results: Of all patients, 53.3% (n=24) was female; and mean age of the sample was 67.38±4.76. 66.7% (n=30) of the patients died dueto malign MCA infarction. The size of craniectomy was larger in 26.7% (n=12), and was standard in the others. Mean time to surgerywas 43.07±29.87 hours. Mortality rate was minimum in group 2 (p=0.01). The patients undergoing to larger craniectomy survivedlonger than the others, but the difference was non-significant (p=0.06).Conclusion: We suggested that not the approach of “surgery as soon as possible” but the surgery between 24-48th hours of theadmission would be the optimal approach. This issue is especially important, because earlier or later interventions not only have aless benefit on the outcome but also may lead several unnecessary complications.

🔖

Cite This Article

YUCETAS, S. C., ÇAKIR, T., KAFADAR, S., KILINÇ, S., UCLER, N. (2022). What is the optimum time to decompressive surgery in the patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction?. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 6, 1045–1051. https://ajindex.com/articles/446886

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M, et al. Malignant middle cerebral artery territory infarction: clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol 1996;53:309-15
  2. Landreneau MM, Sheth KN.Decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery stroke. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2017;38:737-44
  3. Brondani R, Garcia de Almeida A, Abrahim Cherubini P, et al. High risk of seizures and epilepsy after decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignantmiddle cerebral artery stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra 2017;7:51-61
  4. Heiss WD. Malignant MCA Infarction: Pathophysiology and Imaging for Early Diagnosis and Management Decisions. Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;41:1-7
  5. Berrouschot J, Sterker M, Bettin S, et al. Mortality of spaceoccupying (‘malignant’) middle cerebral artery infarction under conservative intensive care. Intensive Care Med 1998;24:620-3
  6. Marmarou A, Anderson R, Ward J, et al. Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1991;75:59-66
  7. Bongiorni GT, Hockmuller MCJ, Klein C, et al. Decompressive craniotomy for the treatment of malignantinfarction of the middlecerebralartery: mortality and outcome. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2017;75:424-8
  8. Lu X, Huang B, Zheng J, et al. Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery. Sci Rep 2014;4:7070
  9. Neugebauer H, Juttler E. Hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: current status and future directions. Int J Stroke 2014;9:460-7
  10. Kurland D, Khaladj-Ghom A, Stokum J, et al. Complications Associated with decompressive craniectomy: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 2015;23:292-304
  11. Huh J, Yang SY, Huh HY, et al. compare the intracranial pressure trend after the decompressive craniectomy between massive intracerebral hemorrhagic and major ischemic stroke patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2018;61:42-50
  12. Taylor B, Lopresti M, Appelboom G, et al. Hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery territory infarction: an updated review.J Neurosurg Sci 2015;59:73-8
  13. Kamran S, Akhtar N, Salam A, et al. Decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery stroke: south asian experience. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2017;26:2306-12
  14. Elsawaf A, Galhom A. decompressive craniotomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: optimal timing and literature review. World Neurosurg 2018;116:71-8
  15. Paliwal P, Kazmi F, Teoh HL, et al. early decompressive hemicraniectomy fo