Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Effects of single high-dose systemic vitamin D injection to dentin-grafted bone defects in osteoporotic rats

Pages
419–424
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The difference between groups Dentin and C was also statistically significant.Conclusion: Intraperitoneally injected single high dose vitamin D had positive effect on dentine graft and bone formation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease posing a public health issue worldwide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential of the intraperitoneal administration of vitamin D on dentine grafted critical-sized cortical bone defects in osteoporotic rat model.Material and Methods: Twenty-four rats were underwent bilateral ovariectomy and 6 weeks after ovariectomy osteoporotic rats model were obtained and divided into three groups: Group A; Dentine-D vit, Group B; Dentine and Group C (control).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The difference between groups Dentin and C was also statistically significant.Conclusion: Intraperitoneally injected single high dose vitamin D had positive effect on dentine graft and bone formation.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease posing a public health issue worldwide. Studies showed that dentine can be an alternative bone graft material in bone defects. The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential of the intraperitoneal administration of vitamin D on dentine grafted critical-sized cortical bone defects in osteoporotic rat model.Material and Methods: Twenty-four rats were underwent bilateral ovariectomy and 6 weeks after ovariectomy osteoporotic rats model were obtained and divided into three groups: Group A; Dentine-D vit, Group B; Dentine and Group C (control). A 5-mm diameter critical- size defect was created in the calvarium of each animal. In Group C, untreated control defects. In Group Dentin, defects were filled with particulate human dentine. In Group Dentin-D vit, defects were filled with particulate human dentine and rats were injected intraperitoneally a single high dose (50.000 U.I./kg) vitamin D. All animals were euthanized at 28 days postoperative.Results: New bone formation was evaluated by histologic and immunohistochemical analysis. Histologic analysis showed that Group Dentin-D vit and Dentin had significantly more new bone at 4 weeks compared with group C. According to immunohistochemical analyses, in group Dentin-D vit, BMP2 staining areas and density were statistically higher than Control group. TGF-β level differences between groups Dentin-D vit and Dentin were statistically significant. Group C had a significantly lower TGF-β grade than the other groups. The osteopontin staining areas in group Dentin-D vit were statistically higher grade than in group Dentin and group C. The difference between groups Dentin and C was also statistically significant.Conclusion: Intraperitoneally injected single high dose vitamin D had positive effect on dentine graft and bone formation.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURER, A., MERCAN, U. (2022). Effects of single high-dose systemic vitamin D injection to dentin-grafted bone defects in osteoporotic rats. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 419–424. https://ajindex.com/articles/446854

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Sweet MG, Sweet JM, Jeremiah MP, et al, Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am Fam Physician 2009;79:193-200
  2. Hendrickx G, Boudin E, Van Hul W, A look behind the scenes: the risk and pathogenesis of primary osteoporosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2015;11:462-74
  3. Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Shindle MK, et al. Osteoporosis and skeletal fractures. HSS J 2006;2:62-9
  4. Zittermann A, Ernst JB, Gummert JF, et al. Vitamin D supplementation body weight and human serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D response: a systematic review. Eur J Nutr 2014;53:367-74
  5. Calori GM, Mazza E, Colombo Met al. The use of bone-graft substitutes in large bone defects: any specific needs? Injury 2011;42:56-63
  6. Neovius E, Engstrand T, Craniofacial reconstruction with bone and biomaterials: review over the last 11 years. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1615-23
  7. Um IW, Kim YK, Mitsugi M, Demineralized dentin matrix scaffolds for alveolar bone engineering. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2017;17:120-27
  8. Valdec S, Pasic P, Soltermann A, et al, Alveolar ridge preservation with autologous particulated dentin-a case series. Int J Implant Dent 2017;3:12
  9. Kim SY, Kim YK, Park YH, et al, Evaluation of the Healing Potential of Demineralized Dentin Matrix Fixed with Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Bone Grafts. Materials (Basel) 2017;10:E1049
  10. Kamal M, Andersson L, Tolba R, et al, Bone regeneration using composite non-demineralized xenogenic dentin with beta-tricalcium phosphate in experimental alveolar cleft repair in a rabbit model. J Transl Med 2017;15:263
  11. Moharamzadeh K, Freeman C, Blackwood K, Processed bovine dentine as a bone substitute, Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;46:110-3
  12. Tatli U, Ustün Y, Kürkçü M, et al, Effects of zoledronic acid on healing of mandibular fractures: an experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:1726-35
  13. Sozmen M, Kabak YB, Gulbahar MY, et al. IImmunohistochemical characterization of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in canine normal testis and testicular tumours, J Comp Pathol 2013;149:10-8
  14. Choi JY, Jung UW, Kim CS, et al, The effects of newly formed synthetic peptide on bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010;40:11-8
  15. Vajgel A, Mardas N, Farias BC, et al. A systematic review on the critical size defect model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:79-93
  16. Zhong W, Sumita Y, Ohba S, et al: In vivo comparison of the bone regeneration capability of human bo