Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 12

Evaluation of MUC-1, MUC-4, CDX-2 and OCT-1 expression profiles in gastric carcinomas and precancerous lesions

Pages
2908–2914
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Positive immunoreactivity with MUC-1and CDX2 was higher in cases with a smaller number of metastatic lymph nodes compared to the cases with a larger number thereof.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: We investigated the diagnostic and prognostic utility of MUC-1, MUC-4, CDX2 and OCT-1 expression profiles in high-mortalitygastric carcinomas and their precancerous lesions.Material and Methods: Areas in proximity of dysplasias and gastric carcinomas that were suspected of having intestinal metaplasiawere stained with PAS / Alcian Blue at pH 2.5 and pH 0.5; Giemsa staining was applied for evaluation of presence of H.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pylori.Results: Presence of MUC-1 expression may exclude the diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Positive immunoreactivity with MUC-1and CDX2 was higher in cases with a smaller number of metastatic lymph nodes compared to the cases with a larger number thereof.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: We investigated the diagnostic and prognostic utility of MUC-1, MUC-4, CDX2 and OCT-1 expression profiles in high-mortalitygastric carcinomas and their precancerous lesions.Material and Methods: Areas in proximity of dysplasias and gastric carcinomas that were suspected of having intestinal metaplasiawere stained with PAS / Alcian Blue at pH 2.5 and pH 0.5; Giemsa staining was applied for evaluation of presence of H. Pylori.Results: Presence of MUC-1 expression may exclude the diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia. MUC-1 and MUC-4 overexpression maybe used for determination of groups at high risk of development of carcinomas, primarily in cases of high-grade dysplasia, whileoverexpression of MUC-1 in gastric carcinomas may be used as a favorable prognostic factor. Presence of CDX2 expression invarious histological types of carcinomas gives rise to a suggestion that intestinal differentiation occurs in all histological types atleast to some degree. OCT-1 plays a role in CDX2-mediated carcinogenesis and its regulation.Conclusion: In cases of dysplasia occurring with intestinal metaplasia, CDX2 was found to be expressed at a significantly higherdegree (95.5%, p=0.011). Expression of CDX2 and OCT-1 was observed in all high-grade dysplasia cases, and was significantlyhigher in comparison to low-grade dysplasia cases (p=0.042; p=0.006, respectively). MUC-1 and MUC-4 expression significantlyincreased with each progressing stage of precancerous lesions in all lesions following low-grade dysplasia (p=0.0001; p=0.027,respectively). MUC-1 expression was the lowest (53.6%) in weak cohesive type carcinomas. Positive immunoreactivity with MUC-1and CDX2 was higher in cases with a smaller number of metastatic lymph nodes compared to the cases with a larger number thereof.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULU, Y., TETİKKURT, S. Ü., İZOL, U., DÖNDER, Y. (2022). Evaluation of MUC-1, MUC-4, CDX-2 and OCT-1 expression profiles in gastric carcinomas and precancerous lesions. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 12, 2908–2914. https://ajindex.com/articles/446803

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Mitrut P, Burada F, Enescu A, et al. The genotoxicity study of resveratrol in primary gastric adenocarcinoma cell cultures. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2009;50:429-33
  2. Mistry M, Parkin DM, Ahmad AS, et al. Cancer incidence in the United Kingdom: projections to the year 2030. Br J Cancer 2011;105:1795-803
  3. JooYE, Park HK, Myung DS, et al. Prevalance and risk factors of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia: a nationwide multicenter prospective study in Korea. Gut Liver 2013;7:303-10
  4. Chiaravalli AM, Klersy C, Vanoli A, et al. Histotypebased prognostic classification of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:538-45
  5. Akyağcı SB, Bağcıvan E, Özgüç H, ve ark. Mide Kanserinde Prognostik Faktörler. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2005;3:113-8
  6. Mutoh H, Hayakawa H, Sakamoto H, et al. Transgenic Cdx2 induces endogenous Cdx1 in istestinal metaplasia of Cdx2 – transgenic mouse stomach. FEBS J 2009:5821-31
  7. Ikarashi S, Nishikura K, Ajoika Y, et al. Re-evaluation of phenotypic expression in undifferentiated – tpye early gastric adenocarcinomas using mucin core protein and CDX2. Gastric Cancer 2013:16;208-19
  8. Werling RW, Yaziji H, Bacchi CE, et al. CDX2, a highly sensitive and specific marker of adenocarcinomas of intestinal origin: an immunohistochemical survey of 476 primary and metastatic carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:303-10
  9. Bai YQ, Miyake S, Iwai T, et al. CDX2, a homeobox transcription factor, upregulates transcription of the p21/WAF1/CIP1 gene. Oncogene 2003;22:7942-9
  10. Song JH, Kim CJ, Cho YG, et al. Genetic alterations of the Cdx2 gene in gastric cancer. APMIS 2008;116:74-80
  11. Oz Puyan F, Can N, Ozyilmaz F, et al. The relationship among PDX1, CDX2 and mucin profiles in gastric carcinomas; correlations with clinicopathologic parameters. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2011:137;1749-62
  12. Tsukamoto T, Mizoshita T, Tatematsu M. Gastric-andintestinal mixed-type intestinal metaplasia: aberrant expression of transcription factors and stem cell intestinalization. Gastric Cancer 2006:9;156-66
  13. Jin T, Li H. Pou homeodomain protein OCT1 is implicated in the expression of the caudal-related homeobox gene Cdx-2. J Biol Chem 2001:276;14752-8
  14. Almeida R, Almeida J, Shoshkes M, et al. OCT-l is over-expressed in intestinal metaplasia and intestinal gastric carcinomas and binds to, but does not transactivate, CDX2 in gastric cells. J Pathol 2005;207:396-401
  15. Carvalho F, David L, Aubert JP, et al. Mucins and mucin -