Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

The relationship between dentistry and forensic medicine

Pages
879–882
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, the dentist should pay attentionto the training on judicial examination and approach to forensic cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The study aimed to have an idea about which subjects the relationship between dentistry and forensic medicine focuses on.Material and Methods: In the study, the consultation forms of the patients who were referred from Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University,Medical Faculty, Forensic Medicine Department to Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and MaxillofacialSurgery Department were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The forms of the patients admitted between January 2014, and January 2019 were analyzed.Demographic information such as gender, age, and the reasons for consultation was obtained from these forms.Results: In this retrospective study, the consultation forms of sixty-three patients were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, the dentist should pay attentionto the training on judicial examination and approach to forensic cases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to have an idea about which subjects the relationship between dentistry and forensic medicine focuses on.Material and Methods: In the study, the consultation forms of the patients who were referred from Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University,Medical Faculty, Forensic Medicine Department to Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and MaxillofacialSurgery Department were examined. The forms of the patients admitted between January 2014, and January 2019 were analyzed.Demographic information such as gender, age, and the reasons for consultation was obtained from these forms.Results: In this retrospective study, the consultation forms of sixty-three patients were examined. The reasons for consultation ofpatients were determined as age estimation (n=32, 50.8%), trauma (n=30, 47.6%) and malpractice (n=1, 1.6%). In patients who wereexposed to trauma, physical assault (n=17, 56.7%), traffic accident (n=5, 16.7%), falling (n=2, 6.7%), and firearm injuries (n=1, 3.3%)were among causes of trauma. In the trauma cases, the hard tissues affected in the maxillofacial region were teeth (n=14, 46.7%),symphysis mandible (n=3, 10%), mandibular condyle (n=2, 6.6%) and angulus mandible (n=2, 6.6%). The gender distribution of thepatients with age estimation is examined; it is seen that the great majority of them were women (n=30, 93.75%). Furthermore, it isseen that age determination is mostly needed between 15-20 years of age (n=27, 84.4%).Conclusion: A dentist can be appointed as an expert for forensic events in professional life. Therefore, the dentist should pay attentionto the training on judicial examination and approach to forensic cases.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBULUT, N., ALTAN, A., ÇETİN, S., ALTAN, H. (2022). The relationship between dentistry and forensic medicine. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 879–882. https://ajindex.com/articles/446561

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Canger EM, Arslan S. The Utilization of Radiology in Forensic Odontology. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2013;23:252-60
  2. Koshy S, Tandon S. Dental age assessment: the applicability of Demirjian's method in south Indian children. Forensic Sci Int 1998;94:73-85
  3. Maber M, Liversidge HM, Hector MP. Accuracy of age estimation of radiographic methods using developing teeth. Forensic Sci Int 2006;159:68-73
  4. Atsu SS, Gokdemir K, Kedici PS, et al. Bitemarks in forensic odontology. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1998;16:30-4
  5. Tug AZ, Yasar F.The Importance of Odontologists and Odontological Studies in Disaster Victim Identification. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2006;30:77- 82
  6. Tug A, Alakoç Y, Çetin CM, et al. Afet Kurbanlarında Kimlik Tespiti. Adli Bilimler Dergisi 2002;1:11-5
  7. Lee SS, Choi JH, Yoon CL, et al. The diversity of dental patterns in the orthopantomography and its significance in human identification. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:784-6
  8. Tümer AR, Keten A, Karacaoğlu E. Declaration of legal event and legal reports. Hacettepe Med Journal 2010;41:128-34
  9. Pekince A, Çakur B. In Forensic Cases Report Preparation and Responsibilities of the Dentist: Review. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci 2019;25:81-9
  10. Karadayı B, Afşin H, Koç S. Radiographic Methods Used for Estimation of Dental Age in Child: Review. Turkiye Klinikleri J Foren Med 2013;10:59-68
  11. Nolla CM. The development of the permanent teeth. J Dent Child 1960;27:254-66
  12. Moorrees CF, Fanning EA, Hunt EE, Jr. Formation and Resorption of Three Deciduous Teeth in Children. Am J Phys Anthropol 1963;21:205-13
  13. Haavikko K. The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth. An orthopantomographic study. Suom Hammaslaak Toim 1970;66:103-70
  14. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 1973;45:211-27
  15. Mornstad H, Staaf V, Welander U. Age estimation with the aid of tooth development: a new method based on objective measurements. Scand J Dent Res 1994;102:137-43
  16. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Cingolani M. Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth. Int J Legal Med 2006;120:49-52
  17. Celik S, Zeren C, Celikel A, et al. Applicability of the Demirjian method for dental assessment of southern Turkish children. J Forensic Leg Med 2014:25:1-5
  18. Onat Altan H, Altan A, Bilgic F, et al. The applicability of Willems' method for age estimation in southern Turkish children: A preliminary study.