SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 12

Comparison outcomes of repeat mini-open microdiscectomy versus fusion for recurrent lumbar disc herniations regarding preoperative radiological features-single institute experience

Barış POLAT
Ayşe Esin POLAT
Ramadan ÖZMANEVRA
Odhan YÜKSEL
Halil İbrahim SECER
Pages
3054–3060
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean age, mean duration of hospital stay and operation time were significantly lowerin microdiscectomy group (p=0.003, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of two different surgical approaches for patients with recurrent lumbardisc herniation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Furthermore, we retrospectively analysed both groups and compared preoperative radiological features, which maybe useful to select most appropriate surgical technique.Materials and Methods: 36 patients underwent mini-open microdiscectomy and 14 patients underwent microdiscectomy withfusion surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation in our institution between 2007-2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean age, mean duration of hospital stay and operation time were significantly lowerin microdiscectomy group (p=0.003, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of two different surgical approaches for patients with recurrent lumbardisc herniation. Furthermore, we retrospectively analysed both groups and compared preoperative radiological features, which maybe useful to select most appropriate surgical technique.Materials and Methods: 36 patients underwent mini-open microdiscectomy and 14 patients underwent microdiscectomy withfusion surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation in our institution between 2007-2017. Patient’s demographic characteristicsand clinical results, as well as preoperative radiological features (such as disc height, disc degeneration, facet joint angle on sagittaland axial plane, existence of foraminal stenosis or previous facetectomy, facet joint degeneration, adjacent segment degeneration,sagittal instability, coronal instability) were retrospectively analyzed and compared between two groups.Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of postoperative visual analog scaleand Oswestry Disability Index scores. The mean age, mean duration of hospital stay and operation time were significantly lowerin microdiscectomy group (p=0.003, p

🔖

Cite This Article

POLAT, B., POLAT, A. E., ÖZMANEVRA, R., YÜKSEL, O., SECER, H. İ. (2022). Comparison outcomes of repeat mini-open microdiscectomy versus fusion for recurrent lumbar disc herniations regarding preoperative radiological features-single institute experience. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 12, 3054–3060. https://ajindex.com/articles/446518

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kim KT, Park SW, Kim YB. Disc height and segmental motion as risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Spine 2009;34:2674-8
  2. Ellenbogen JR, Marlow W, Fischer BE et al. Is the rate of re-operation after primary lumbar microdiscectomy affected by surgeon grade or intra-operative lavage of the disc space? Br J Neurosurg 2014;28:247-51
  3. Wera GD, Dean CL, Ahn UM, et al. Reherniation and failure after lumbar discectomy: a comparison of fragment excision alone versus subtotal discectomy. J Spinal Disord Techn 2008;21:316-9
  4. Goker B, Aydin S. Endoscopic surgery for recurrent disc herniation after microscopic or endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Turk Neurosurg 2020;30:112-8
  5. Selva-Sevilla C, Ferrara P, Geronimo-Pardo M. Costutility analysis for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Conservative treatment versus discectomy versus discectomy with fusion. Clin Spine Surg 2019;32:228- 34
  6. Tanavalee C, Limthongkul W, Yingsakmongkol W, et al. A comparison between repeat discectomy versus fusion for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 2019;66:202-8
  7. Chen HC, Lee CH, Wei L, et al. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar surgery for adjacent segment degeneration and recurrent disc herniation. Neurol Res Int 2015;2015:791943
  8. Le H, Sandhu FA, Fessler RG. Clinical outcomes after minimal access surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus 2003;15:12
  9. Chen Z, Zhao J, Liu A, et al. Surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Int Orthop 2009;33:197-201
  10. Chitnavis B, Barbagallo G, Selway R, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision disc surgery: review of 50 cases in which carbon fiber cages were implanted. J Neurosurg 2001;95:190-5
  11. Liu C, Zhou Y. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for recurrent lumbar disk herniation. World Neurosurg 2017;98:14-20
  12. Beack JY, Chun HJ, Bak KH, et al. Risk factors of secondary lumbar discectomy of a herniated lumbar disc after lumbar discectomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2019;62:586-93
  13. Shimia M, Babaei-Ghazani A, Sadat BE, et al. Risk factors of recurrent lumbar disk herniation. Asian J Neurosurg 2013;8:93-6
  14. Griffith JF, Wang YX, Antonio GE, et al. Modified Pfirrmann grading system for lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32