Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 11

Refractive results, visual quality and patient satisfaction with a new trifocal intraocular lens design

Pages
3018–3023
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Contrast sensitivity results and low incidence of dysphotopicphenomena might be associated with high patient satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the outcomes after bilateral implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens (IOL).Materials and Methods: The study included patients with visually significant cataract that underwent bilateral implantation of theAcriva Trinova Sinusoidal Trifocal IOL.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and postoperative uncorrecteddistance visual acuity (UDVA), CDVA, uncorrected intermediate (UIVA) and near visual acuities (UNVA) along with manifest refractionswere assessed at 1 month and 6 months after cataract surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Contrast sensitivity results and low incidence of dysphotopicphenomena might be associated with high patient satisfaction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the outcomes after bilateral implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens (IOL).Materials and Methods: The study included patients with visually significant cataract that underwent bilateral implantation of theAcriva Trinova Sinusoidal Trifocal IOL. The preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and postoperative uncorrecteddistance visual acuity (UDVA), CDVA, uncorrected intermediate (UIVA) and near visual acuities (UNVA) along with manifest refractionswere assessed at 1 month and 6 months after cataract surgery. The defocus curve and contrast sensitivity (CS) were evaluated atthe 6th month visit. Patient satisfaction and incidence of dysphotopic symptoms were assessed.Results: The study enrolled a total of 60 eyes of 30 patients, 10 males and 20 females aged 61.78± 8.73 years (range, 45 to 78 years).90% of the patients (n: 27) achieved a binocular UIVA of 0.1 LogMAR or better at the 6-month visit while, 96.7% (n:29) patients hada binocular UNVA of 0.1 LogMAR or better in the same postoperative visit. The CS results were within the the range of normalityat 6 months post-surgery. 6.7% of patients reported marked halo around light sources and 3.3% reported glare that interferes withnighttime driving. 96.6% of the patients reported spectacle independence for all distances and rated their visual function and qualitysatisfactory at all distances.Conclusion: Bilateral implantation of the Acriva Trinova Sinusoidal Trifocal IOL seems to provide effective restoration of visualfunction at all distances after cataract surgery in the majority of patients. Contrast sensitivity results and low incidence of dysphotopicphenomena might be associated with high patient satisfaction.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARİFOĞLU, H. B., ÖZATEŞ, S., CERAN, B. B., TAŞINDI, E. E. (2022). Refractive results, visual quality and patient satisfaction with a new trifocal intraocular lens design. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 11, 3018–3023. https://ajindex.com/articles/446425

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Calladine D, Evans JR, Shah S et al. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Sao Paulo Med J 2015;133:68
  2. Braga-Mele R, Chang D, Dewey S et al. Multifocal intraocular lenses: relative indications and contraindications for implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40:313-22
  3. Cillino G, Casuccio A, Pasti M et al. Working-age cataract patients: visual results, reading performance, and quality of life with three diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmol 2014;121:34-44
  4. Kohnen T. First implantation of a diffractive quadrafocal (trifocal) intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41:2330-2
  5. Gundersen KG, Potvin R. Comparison of visual outcomes and subjective visual quality after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of apodized diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:805-11
  6. Madrid-Costa D, Ruiz-Alcocer J, Ferrer-Blasco T et al. Optical quality differences between three multifocal intraocular lenses: bifocal low add, bifocal moderate add, and trifocal. J Refract Surg 2013;29:749-54 7. Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N et al. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:765-73
  7. Davison JA, Simpson MJ. History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:849-58
  8. Alió JL, Elkady B, Ortiz D et al. Clinical outcomes and intraocular quality of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with asymmetrical Light distribution. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:942-8
  9. Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Puchades C et al. Intermediate visual function with different multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:733-9
  10. Mojzis P, MAjerova K, Plaza –Puche AB et al. Visual outcomes of a new toric trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41:695-706 12. Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Alió del Barrio JL et al. Clinical outcomes with a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. European J Ophthalmol 2018;28:419-24
  11. Kohnen T, Herzog M, Hemkeppler E et al. Visual performance of a quadrifocal (trifocal) intraocular lens following removal of the crystalline lens. Am J Ophthalmol 2017;184:52-62
  12. Cochener B, Vryghem J, Rozot P et al. Clinical outcomes with a trifocal intraocular lens: a multicenter study. J Refract Surg 2014;30:762-8.