Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of effectiveness of central venous catheterrelated bloodstream infections in the antesty andreanimation intensive care units of the bundle

Pages
792–798
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The overall compatibility of ICUs for the CLABSI bundle was 61%, 65% and 70%, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of prevention bundle study on central venous catheter-associated bloodstreaminfection (CLABSI) in the Anesthesia and Reanimation Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients who have central venous catheter.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It has been reported that the use ofproven interventions as a bundle to prevent infections associated with invasive tools is effective in reducing infection rates.Materials and Methods:The study was conducted interventionally between July and December 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The overall compatibility of ICUs for the CLABSI bundle was 61%, 65% and 70%, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of prevention bundle study on central venous catheter-associated bloodstreaminfection (CLABSI) in the Anesthesia and Reanimation Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients who have central venous catheter. Invasivevehicle related infections, especially CLABSIs, are one of the most difficult infections in ICUs. It has been reported that the use ofproven interventions as a bundle to prevent infections associated with invasive tools is effective in reducing infection rates.Materials and Methods:The study was conducted interventionally between July and December 2017. Data, physician and nurseinformation form, CLABSI package tracking form, CLABSI package information test form, CVC insertion process observation form,bedside CLABSI package tracking form, and CLABSI package tracking form. Ethics committee permission was obtained for thestudy. Approval was obtained from nurses and doctors. The study was carried out in three stages. Number, Percentage, Chi-square,Fisher Exact Chi-square Test and Wilcoxon Test were used in the research. Results: The overall compatibility of ICUs for the CLABSI bundle was 61%, 65% and 70%, respectively. As a result of the Bundle study,CLABSI rates per 1000 catheter days were decreased, from 11.3 to 9.5 in ICU1, from 9.4 to 6.8 in ICU2, and from 17.1 to 10.6 in ICU3. Conclusion: As a result, it was seen that CLABSI precaution bundle study prepared with evidence based guidelines decreasedinfection rates. The bundle is recommended for use in intensive care units.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACUN, A., ÇALIŞKAN, N. (2022). Evaluation of effectiveness of central venous catheterrelated bloodstream infections in the antesty andreanimation intensive care units of the bundle. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 792–798. https://ajindex.com/articles/446279

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Reyes DCV, Bloomer M, Morphet J. Prevention of central venous line associated bloodstream infections in adult intensive care units: A systematic review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2017;11
  2. Richter JP, McAlearney AS. Targeted implementation of the comprehensive unit-based safety program through an assessment of safety culture to minimize central line-associated bloodstream infections. Health Care Manage Rev 2018;43:42-9
  3. Beware: CDC-2018. https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/ portal/progress-report.html. access date: 31 May 2020 4. Drews FA, Bakdash JZ, Gleed JR. Improving central line maintenance to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections. Am J Infect Control 2017;45: 1224-30
  4. Yazici G, Bulut H. Efficacy of a care bundle to prevent multiple infections in the intensive care unit: A quasiexperimental pretest-posttest design study. Appl Nurs Res 2018;39:4-10
  5. Sood G, Caffrey J, Krout K, et al. Use of implementation science for a sustained reduction of central-lineassociated bloodstream infections in a high-volume, regional burn unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1306-11
  6. Turkey Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (INFLINE) Summary Report. Ministry of Health General Directorate of Public Health 2018
  7. Kaya H, Turan Y, Akbal S, et al.The effect of nursing care protocol on the prevention of central venous catheter-related infections in neurosurgery intensive care unit. Appl Nurs Res 2016;32:257-61
  8. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections 2011; CDC
  9. Sanli D, Sarikaya A, Katicioglu K. Examination of the effectiveness of evidence-based recommendations in the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections in ICU patients. Bakirkoy J Med 2016;12: 163-87
  10. Ture Yuce Z, Alp E. Infection control bundles for prevention of nosocomial infections. Mediterranean J Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials 2016;5:8
  11. Bonne S, Mazuski JE, Sona C, et al. Effectiveness of minocycline and rifampin vs chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine-ımpregnated central venous catheters in preventing central line-associated bloodstream ınfection in a high-volume academic ıntensive care unit: a before and after trial. The American College of Surgeons 2015;221:739-47
  12. Noto MJ, Domenico HJ, Byrne DW, et al. Chlorhexidine bathingand health care–associated ınfections a randomized clinical trial. American Medical Association 2015;313:4
  13. Siegel JD, Rhinehart E