SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 6

A comparison of outcomes between Syrian and Turkish patients with traumatic brain injury admitted to intensive care in Gaziantep, Turkey, two border sharing countries

Ali Muhittin TAŞDOĞAN
Ebru TARIKÇI KILIÇ
Pages
1566–1570
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

During hospitalization, factors associated with mortality were low on admission (GCS

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of Syrian patients with serious TBI admitted alive in intensive care units(ICUs) and to compare their results with Turkish patients.As a direct consequence of the ongoing civil war, Syrian patients withsevere traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been receiving neurosurgical intervention in Turkey.Material and Methods: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and written informed consent was obtained frompatientsfamilies prior to participation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study sample consisted of 44 Syrianand 42 Turkish TBI patients in ICUs in Gaziantep, thecity which hosts the most Syrian refugees.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:During hospitalization, factors associated with mortality were low on admission (GCS
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of Syrian patients with serious TBI admitted alive in intensive care units(ICUs) and to compare their results with Turkish patients.As a direct consequence of the ongoing civil war, Syrian patients withsevere traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been receiving neurosurgical intervention in Turkey.Material and Methods: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and written informed consent was obtained frompatientsfamilies prior to participation. The study sample consisted of 44 Syrianand 42 Turkish TBI patients in ICUs in Gaziantep, thecity which hosts the most Syrian refugees. Medical records of Syrian patients were compared with those of Turkish patients in termsof age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores, mechanism of injury, neurological status (Glasgow Coma Score)[GCS] on admission, surgical methods, postoperative complicationsmorbidity and mortality rates.Results: Totally 25% of Syrian patients were admitted to ICUs for gunshot wounds while 59.5% of Turkish patients were admitted toICUs due to traffic accident traumas. During hospitalization, factors associated with mortality were low on admission (GCS

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞDOĞAN, A. M., KILIÇ, E. T. (2022). A comparison of outcomes between Syrian and Turkish patients with traumatic brain injury admitted to intensive care in Gaziantep, Turkey, two border sharing countries. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 6, 1566–1570. https://ajindex.com/articles/446200

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Sahlool Z, Sankri-Tarbichi A, Kherallah M. Evaluation report of health care services at the Syrian refugee camps in Turkey. Avicenna J Med 2012;2:25-8
  2. Republic of Turkey and Prime Ministry Disaster & Emergency Management Authority, “Disaster Report Syria-AFAD.” 2016, 3. Moreno A, Grodin MA. Torture and its neurological sequelae.Spinal Cord 2002;40:213-23
  3. Palic S, Elklit A. An explorative outcome study of CBT-based multidisciplinary treatment in a diverse group of refugees from a Danish treatment centre for rehabilitation of traumatized refugees.Torture 2009; 19:23
  4. Hoge CW, McGurk D, Thomas JL. Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. Soldiers returning from Iraq. N Engl J Med 2008;358:453-63
  5. Brandvold B, Levi L,Feinsod M, et al.Penetrating craniocerebral injuries in the Israeli involvement in the Lebanese conflict. 1982-1985. Analysis of a less aggressive surgical approach. J Neurosurg 1990;72:15-21
  6. Levi L, Borovich B, Guilburd JN, et al. Wartime neurosurgical experience in Lebanon, 1982-85. Penetrating craniocerebral injuries. Isr J Med Sci. 1990;26:548-54
  7. Pfortmueller CA, Graf F, Tabarra M, et al. Exadaktylos. “Acute health problems in African refugees: Ten years' experience in a swiss emergency department,” Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 2012;124:647-52
  8. Müller M, Klingberg K, Srivastava D, et al. Consultations by asylum seekers: Recent trends in the Emergency Department of a Swiss University Hospital. PLoS ONE, 2016;11:5
  9. Aboutanos MB, Baker SP. Wartime civilian injuries: Epidemiology and intervention strategies. J Trauma 1997;43:719-26
  10. Atiyeh BS, Hayek SN. Management of war-related burn injuries: lessons learned from recent ongoing conflicts providing exceptional care in unusual places. J CraniofacSurg 2010;21:1529-37
  11. Marcikic M. View of a war from a pathology department: Croatian experience. Med War 1993;9:33-9
  12. Vujovic B, Mazlagic D. Epidemiology and surgical management ofabdominalwar injuries inSarajevo:StateHospitalofSarajevo experience. Prehosp Dis Med 1994; 9:29-34
  13. Marina K, Branimir T, Ranko S,et al. Fatalities in the war in Croatia, 1991 and 1992: underlying and external causes of death. JAMA 1993;270:626-8
  14. Bhatnagar MK, Curtis MJ, Smith GS. Musculoskeletal injuries in the Afghan war.Injury 1992;23:545-8
  15. Nassoura Z, Hajj H, Dajani O, et al. Trauma management in a war zone: the Lebanese war experience. J Trauma 1991;31:1596-9
  16. DuBose JJ, Barmparas G, Inaba K. Isolated severe trau