Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 11

Evaluation of the compatibility of clinical primary diagnoses with mri reports in patients with temporomandibular disc displacement

Pages
2911–2915
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There is no statistically significant difference between primaryclinical diagnosis groups in terms of clinical and MRI diagnosis compatibility.Conclusion: It is concluded that clinical findings determined by the clinicians do not compatible MRI reports determined by radiologist.This may be due to the subjective nature of the clinical findings, and both MRI and clinical results are needed for precise results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) is a common disease group in the community that includes chewing muscles andtemporomandibular joint (TMJ) components.
📊
Key Findings & Data:TMJ diseases are also the main cause of non-odontogenic pain of the orofacial region.The aim of this study is to evaluate the consistency between clinical diagnosis and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) reports inpatients with reduction with disc displacement (DDWR) and reduction without disc displacement (DDWoR).Materials and Methods: A total of 62 TMJ anamnesis records and MRI results were evaluated by authors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There is no statistically significant difference between primaryclinical diagnosis groups in terms of clinical and MRI diagnosis compatibility.Conclusion: It is concluded that clinical findings determined by the clinicians do not compatible MRI reports determined by radiologist.This may be due to the subjective nature of the clinical findings, and both MRI and clinical results are needed for precise results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) is a common disease group in the community that includes chewing muscles andtemporomandibular joint (TMJ) components. TMJ diseases are also the main cause of non-odontogenic pain of the orofacial region.The aim of this study is to evaluate the consistency between clinical diagnosis and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) reports inpatients with reduction with disc displacement (DDWR) and reduction without disc displacement (DDWoR).Materials and Methods: A total of 62 TMJ anamnesis records and MRI results were evaluated by authors. Radiology reports andanamnesis records were divided into two groups according to the clinical primary diagnosis file as DDWR and DDWoR. The clinicaland radiographic results were compared each other and the correlation between these results was evaluated statistically.Results: The study includes sixty-two patients’ MRI reports and TMJ clinical anamnesis files (12 males and 50 female) with a meanage of 31.20±13.66 years. In group DDWoR there is only 41.9 % and in group DDWR there is only 45.2 % correlation found betweenclinical and MRI reports of the patients. Although the values obtained are statistically significant, there is insignificant agreementbetween in the TMJ clinical anamnesis file and MRI report results. There is no statistically significant difference between primaryclinical diagnosis groups in terms of clinical and MRI diagnosis compatibility.Conclusion: It is concluded that clinical findings determined by the clinicians do not compatible MRI reports determined by radiologist.This may be due to the subjective nature of the clinical findings, and both MRI and clinical results are needed for precise results.

🔖

Cite This Article

YANIK, S., POLAT, M. (2022). Evaluation of the compatibility of clinical primary diagnoses with mri reports in patients with temporomandibular disc displacement. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 11, 2911–2915. https://ajindex.com/articles/446141

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Okeson JP. Joint intracapsular disorders: diagnostic and non surgical management considerations. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:85-103
  2. Wadhwa S, Kapila S. TMJ disorders: future innovations in diagnostics and therapeutics.J Dent Educ 2008;72:930-47
  3. Guo C, Shi Z, Revington P. Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(4):CD004973. Published 2009 Oct 7
  4. Malik AH. Role of Arthrocentesis with and without steriod for internal derangement of TMJ. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2014;13:73-6
  5. Paduano S, Bucci R, Rongo R, et al. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders and oral parafunctions in adolescents from public schools in Southern Italy. Cranıo 2018;14:1-6
  6. Talaat WM, Adel OI, Al Bayatti S. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders discovered incidentally during routine dental examination using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2018;125:250-9
  7. Pharoach MJ. Temporomandibular Joint Imaging. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:627-43
  8. Katzberg RW. Temporomandibular Joint Imaging. Radiol 1989;170:297-307
  9. Ferreira LA, Grossmann E, Januzzi E, et al. Diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders: Indication of imaging exams. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2016;82:341- 52
  10. Lazarin Rd, Previdelli IT, Silva Rd, et al. Correlation of gender and age with magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with arthrogenic temporomandibular disorders: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45:1222-8
  11. Dupuy-Bonafé I, Picot MC, Maldonado IL, et al. Internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint:is there still a place for ultrasound? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathl Oral Radiol 2012;113:832-40
  12. Rudisch A, Innerhofer K, Bertram S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of internal derangement and effusion in patients with unilateral temporomandibular joint pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:566-71
  13. Brady AP, Mcdevtt L, Stack JP, et al. A Technique for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Temporomandibular Joint. Clinical Radiology 1993; 47:127-133
  14. Yıldırım D, Alkış Ü. Temporomandibular Eklem Bozukluklarının Değerlendirilmesinde Kullanılan Görüntüleme Yöntemleri. SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 2016;7:51-7
  15. Lee YH, Lee KM, Auh Q, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging‑based prediction of the relationship between whiplash injury and temporomandibular disorders.