Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Relation of susceptibility-weighted imaging findings withhistological grade in intracranial meningiomas

Pages
806–811
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ki-67 proliferation index was significantly higher in high-grade meningiomascompared to low-grade. (p = 0.000).Conclusion: SWI combined with peritumoral edema may help to predict high grade in intracranial meningiomas.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: We aimed to investigate the relation of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) findings with histological grade in intracranialmeningiomas.Materials and Methods: Histopathologically confirmed 58 intracranial meningioma patients (48 typical (low-grade meningioma), 10atypical (high-grade meningioma)) who had undergone preoperative SWI between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated.Tumor size, location, presence of peritumoral edema, WHO grade, low-grade meningioma subtypes and Ki-67 proliferation indexeswere noted.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, Fisher’s exacttests and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed for statistical assessment.Results: There was a significant association between SWI-positivity and low-grade in meningiomas (p = 0.010).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ki-67 proliferation index was significantly higher in high-grade meningiomascompared to low-grade. (p = 0.000).Conclusion: SWI combined with peritumoral edema may help to predict high grade in intracranial meningiomas.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to investigate the relation of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) findings with histological grade in intracranialmeningiomas.Materials and Methods: Histopathologically confirmed 58 intracranial meningioma patients (48 typical (low-grade meningioma), 10atypical (high-grade meningioma)) who had undergone preoperative SWI between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated.Tumor size, location, presence of peritumoral edema, WHO grade, low-grade meningioma subtypes and Ki-67 proliferation indexeswere noted. SWI findings of intracranial meningiomas were categorized as either positive or negative based on presence/absence ofintratumoral susceptibility signals (ITSSs). The origin of ITSSs in SWI-positive meningiomas was assessed with phase images andclassified as calcification (SWI-C), vascular structure (SWI-V) or hemorrhage (SWI-H). Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, Fisher’s exacttests and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed for statistical assessment.Results: There was a significant association between SWI-positivity and low-grade in meningiomas (p = 0.010). A higher incidenceof calcification was found in low-grade meningiomas (%60 in low-grade vs %10 in high-grade). Peritumoral edema was found to beassociated with high grade in meningiomas (p = 0.032). Ki-67 proliferation index was significantly higher in high-grade meningiomascompared to low-grade. (p = 0.000).Conclusion: SWI combined with peritumoral edema may help to predict high grade in intracranial meningiomas.

🔖

Cite This Article

ER, A., BOZDAĞ, M. (2022). Relation of susceptibility-weighted imaging findings withhistological grade in intracranial meningiomas. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 806–811. https://ajindex.com/articles/446010

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Chamoun R, Krisht KM, Couldwell WT. Incidental meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 2011;31:19
  2. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World HealthOrganizationclassification of tumors of thecentralnervoussystem: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016;131:803-20
  3. Claus EB, Bondy ML, Schildkraut JM, et al. Epidemiology of intracranial meningioma. Neurosurgery 2005;57:1088-95
  4. Riemenschneider MJ, Perry A, Reifenberger G. Histological classificationandmoleculargenetics of meningiomas. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:1045-54
  5. Watts J, Box G, Galvin A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2014;5:113-22
  6. Mittal S, Wu Z, Neelavalli J, et al. Susceptibilityweighted imaging:technical aspects and clinical applications, part 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:232-52
  7. Haacke EM, Xu Y, Cheng YC, et al. Susceptibilityweighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004;52:612-8
  8. Haacke EM, Mittal S, Wu Z, et al. Susceptibility weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:19-30
  9. Chen W, Zhu W, Kovanlikaya I, et al. Intracranial calcifications and hemorrhages: characterization with quantitative susceptibility mapping. Radiology 2014;270:496-505
  10. Ding Y, Xing Z, Liu B, et al. Differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma from high-grade glioma and brain metastases using susceptibilityweighted imaging. Brain Behav 2014;4:841-9
  11. Kim HS, Jahng GH, Ryu CW, et al. Added value and diagnostic performance of intratumoral susceptibility signals in the differential diagnosis of solitary enhancing brain lesions: preliminary study. Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1574-9
  12. Yu Y, Zhang H, Xiao Z, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI combined with susceptibility-weighted MRI: added diagnostic value for four common lateral ventricular tumors. Acta Radiol 2018;59:980-7
  13. Saini J, Gupta PK, Sahoo P, et al. Differentiation of grade II/III and grade IV glioma by combining “T1 contrast enhanced brain perfusion imaging” and susceptibility-weighted quantitative imaging. Neuroradiology 2018;60:43-50
  14. Chen T, Jiang B, Zheng Y, et al. Differentiating intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma from meningioma using diffusion-weighted imaging and susceptibility-weighted imaging. Neuroradiology 2020;62:175-84
  15. Oya S, Kim SH, Sade B, et al. The natural history of intracranial meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2011;114:1250-6
  16. Hwang WL, Marciscano AE, Niemierko A, et