Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 6

The posterior surgical treatment and outcomes of cervicalspondylotic myelopathy: Why not C5 nerve root palsyoccur

Pages
1167–1171
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There weren’t any symptomsfor C5 nerve root palsy which is a common postoperative complication.Conclusions: The cervical posterior laminectomy, which includes en-bloc laminectomy and preserving of the facet joint capsule,allows a sufficient and safe decompression of the neural structures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is an age-related degenerative spinal pathology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:C5 palsy is a common complication after the posterior approach.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There weren’t any symptomsfor C5 nerve root palsy which is a common postoperative complication.Conclusions: The cervical posterior laminectomy, which includes en-bloc laminectomy and preserving of the facet joint capsule,allows a sufficient and safe decompression of the neural structures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is an age-related degenerative spinal pathology. Anterior or posterior approaches are preferredfor surgical treatment. C5 palsy is a common complication after the posterior approach. The aim of our study is to describe themodified laminectomy technique, evaluate short-time surgical outcomes and comment on the C5 nerve root palsy formation.Materials and Methods: 83 patients who had been treated by modified laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy between theyears 2012 and 2017 in our clinic were undertaken in our study. We evaluated the preoperative and postoperative neurologic statusof the patients with VAS and JOA scales, complications (C5 palsy) of surgical treatment. The posterior approach was not performedat patients with a >13 degree angle of cervical curvature. Results: 61 of 83 patients were male and 22 were female. The mean age at the time of surgery was 57.8±8.3. The average JOA scalescore was 9.4±0.9 preoperatively, 10.1±.0.9 early postoperatively and 15.1±1.0 during the late postoperative follow-up. The averageangle of the cervical curvature preoperatively-postoperatively was 17.1±2.6 and 15.8±2.4 respectively. There weren’t any symptomsfor C5 nerve root palsy which is a common postoperative complication.Conclusions: The cervical posterior laminectomy, which includes en-bloc laminectomy and preserving of the facet joint capsule,allows a sufficient and safe decompression of the neural structures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, Y., YÜCE, İ., KAHYAOĞLU, O., ATASEVEN, M., ÇAVUŞOĞLU, H. (2022). The posterior surgical treatment and outcomes of cervicalspondylotic myelopathy: Why not C5 nerve root palsyoccur. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 6, 1167–1171. https://ajindex.com/articles/445846

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Klineberg E. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A review of the evidence. Orthop Clin N Am 2010;41:193-202
  2. Bohlman HH, Emery SE. The pathophysiology of cervical spondylosis and myelopathy. Spine 2001;13:843-6
  3. König SA, Spetzger U. Surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy indications for anterior, posterior or combined procedures for decompression and stabilization. Acta Neurochir 2014;156:253-8
  4. Suk KS, Kim KT, Lee JH, et al. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty. Spine 2007;32:656-60
  5. Chen Y, Chen D, Wang X. et al. C5 palsy after laminectomy and posterior cervical fixation for ossifcation of posterior longitudinal ligament. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007;20:533-5
  6. Chiba K, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M. et al. Segmental motor paralysis after expansive open door laminectomy. Spine 2002;27:2108-15
  7. Epstein JA: Extradural tethering effects as one mechanism of radiculopathy complicating posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. Spine 1996;21:1839-40
  8. Komagata M, Nishiyama M, Endo K. et al. Prophylaxis of C5 palsy after cervical expansive laminectomy by bilateral partial foraminotomy. Spine J 2004;4:650-5
  9. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H: C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: Review of the literature. Spine 2003;28:2447-51
  10. Sasai K, Saito T, Akagi S. et al. Preventing C5 palsy after laminectomy. Spine 2003;28:1972-7
  11. Takemitsu M, Cheung KM, Wong YW. Et al. C5nerve root palsy after cervical laminoplasty and posterior fusionwith instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:267-72
  12. Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K. et al. Extradural tethering effect as one mechanism of radiculopathy complicating posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:203-10
  13. Uematsu Y, Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H. Radiculopathy after laminectomy of the cervical spine. Spine 1998;23:2057-6
  14. Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K. et al. Paralysis of the arm after posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. II; Analyses of clinical fndings. Eur Spine J 1993;2:197-202
  15. Wilson JR, Patel AA, Brodt ED. et al. Genetics and heritability of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Results of a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:123-46
  16. Nurick S: The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 1972;95:87-100
  17. Hukuda S, Mochizuki T, Ogata