Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 10

Preoperative embolization of meningiomas: Single center experience

Pages
1815–1819
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: There were no significant differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, or change in hemoglobin level between meningioma patients who underwent preoperative embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles and those who did not.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of polyvinyl alcohol particle embolization to meningioma surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The study included 24 patients (19 women, 5 men) who were operated for meningioma at our institution between October 2018 and October 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: There were no significant differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, or change in hemoglobin level between meningioma patients who underwent preoperative embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles and those who did not.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of polyvinyl alcohol particle embolization to meningioma surgery. Materials and Methods: The study included 24 patients (19 women, 5 men) who were operated for meningioma at our institution between October 2018 and October 2019. Ten patients underwent tumor embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles before meningioma surgery, while the other 14 patients were operated directly without embolization. Groups were constituted as with embolized and non-embolized before surgery.Patient and tumor characteristics, embolization procedure, operative blood loss, operative time, and complications were compared between patients with and without preoperative embolization. Results: The patients ranged in age between 28 and 79 years, with a mean age of 54.16±10.50. Mean operative time was 4.59 hours for the embolized patients and 4.72 hours for the non-embolized patients (p>0.05). Mean hemoglobin values were decreased by 1.25 g/dl in the embolized patients and 1.35 g/dl in the non-embolized patients (p>0.05). Conclusion: There were no significant differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, or change in hemoglobin level between meningioma patients who underwent preoperative embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles and those who did not.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yildiz, B., Soylemez, B. (2022). Preoperative embolization of meningiomas: Single center experience. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 10, 1815–1819. https://ajindex.com/articles/445682

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Toh CH, Castillo M, Wong AM, et al. Differentiation between classic and atypical meningiomas with use of diffusion tensor imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1630-5
  2. Perry A, Stafford SL, Scheithauer BW, et al. Suman VJ, Lohse CM. Meningioma grading: An analysis of histologic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21:1455-65
  3. Manelfe C, Lasjaunias P, Ruscalleda J. Preoperative embolization of intracranial meningiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1986;7:963-72
  4. Singla A, Deshaies EM, Melnyk V, et al. Controversies in the role of preoperative embolization in meningioma management. Neurosurg Focus 2013;35:e17
  5. Carli DF, Sluzewski M, Beute GN, et al. Complications of particle embolization of meningiomas: frequency, risk factors, and outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:152-4
  6. Hirschl R, Caragine L.P. Endovascular techniques for tumor embolization. Winn HR (editor). Youmans Neurological Surgery. 6th Edition. Philadelphia, United States of America: Elsevier Saunders; 2011.p.224– 1228
  7. Przybylowski CJ, Zhao X, Baranoski JF, et al. Preoperative embolization versus no embolization for WHO grade I intracranial meningioma: a retrospective matched cohort study. J Neurosurg 2020;27:1-8
  8. Raper DM, Starke RM, Henderson F Jr, et al. Preoperative embolization of intracranial meningiomas: efficacy, technical considerations, and complications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1798-804
  9. Mefty OA, Abdulrauf SI, Haddad GF. Meningiomas. Winn HR. Youmans Neurological Surgery. 6th Edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2011.p.1426-49
  10. Wakhloo AK, Juengling FD, Van Velthoven V, et al. Extended preoperative polyvinyl alcohol microembolization of intracranial meningiomas: assessment of two embolization techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:571-82
  11. Shah AH1, Patel N, Raper DM, et al. The role of preoperative embolization for intracranial meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2013;19:364-72
  12. Manaka H, Sakata K, Tatezuki J, et al. Safety And Efficacy Of Preoperative Embolization In Patients With Meningioma. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018;79:328- 33
  13. Barros G, Feroze AH, Sen R, et al. MR. Predictors of preoperative endovascular embolization of meningiomas: subanalysis of anatomic location and arterial supply. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:204-8
  14. Gruber P, Schwyzer L, Klinger E et al. Longitudinal Imaging Of Tumor Volume, Diffusivity, And Perfusion After Preoperative Endovascular Embolization In Supratentorial Hemispheric Meningiomas. World Neurosurg 2018;120