Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 1996 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Moraxella bovis'in tüm hücre proteinlerinin elektroforetik analizi

Pages
61–63
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Only two different protein bands of 22 and 18 kDa molecular weight were seen among hemolytic and hemagglutinating isolates from these two countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Whole-cell proteins of ten field isolates of Moraxela bovis from cattle with bovine infectious keratoconjunctivitis were examined with SDS-PAGE technique.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Four major protein band of 55, 37, 35, 19 kDa molecular weights were found in all M. bovis strains.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Only two different protein bands of 22 and 18 kDa molecular weight were seen among hemolytic and hemagglutinating isolates from these two countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Whole-cell proteins of ten field isolates of Moraxela bovis from cattle with bovine infectious keratoconjunctivitis were examined with SDS-PAGE technique. Seven isolates were hemolytic and hemagglutinating and three were non-hemolytic and non-hemagglutinating. Four major protein band of 55, 37, 35, 19 kDa molecular weights were found in all M. bovis strains. Twenty-eight protein bands were identical in all M. bovis strains, but four additional protein bands with approximate molecular weights of 97, 63.5 and 22 kDa were detected in non-hemolytic strains. Five hemolytic and hemaglutinating field isolates from Turkey and two isolates from USA had 30 identical bands. Only two different protein bands of 22 and 18 kDa molecular weight were seen among hemolytic and hemagglutinating isolates from these two countries.

Özet

İnfeksiyöz keratokonjuktivitisli sığırlardan izole edilen 10 adet Moraxella bovis saha izolatının tüm hücre proteinleri SDS-PAGE tekniği ile incelendi, îzolatların yedisi hemoliz ve hemaglutinasyon pozitif, üçü hemoliz ve he-maglutinasyon negatifti. Elektroforetik analiz sonucunda tüm M. bovis suşlannda 55, 37, 35 ve 19 kDa ağırlığında majör protein bandlan saptandı. M. bovis'in tüm suşlannda 28 protein bandı benzer bulunurken, hemoliz negatif suşlarda ayrıca 97, 92, 63.5 ve 22 kDa molekül ağırlığında 4 farklı protein bandı belirlendi. Türkiye'de izole edilen 5 ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nde izole edilen hemoliz ve hemaglutinasyon pozitif suşlar arasında 30 ortak bant saptandı. Bu iki ülkeden izole edilen hemoliz ve hemaglutinasyon pozitif M. bovis suşlannda 22 ve 18 kDa molekül ağırlığında iki protein bandı farklı bulundu.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİKER, S., ERDEĞER, J., AKAN, M. (2022). Moraxella bovis'in tüm hücre proteinlerinin elektroforetik analizi. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 61–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/445546

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Chandler,R.L.,Baptista,P.J.H.P.,TurfreyB.(1979).Sıııdieson the pathogeııicityof Moraxellabo"i.l' in re-/ation Lobıfectiousboviııekeratocoııjuctivitis.J Comp Path,89.441-448
  2. Erdeğer,J. Aydın,N. (1989).Sığır/ardanizole edi/enMoraxellabo"is sı/ş/arlı/lllçeşit/i özellik/erininaraştm/masl.Doğa Tr J Yel and AnimalSci. 15.140-147
  3. GiI- Turnes,C. (1983).Hemag/utinatioıı,aUlOhemag/uıi-Ilationand pathogeniciıyof Moraxellabo"is strains.Can JComp Med. 47,503-504
  4. Henson,J.B., Grumbles,L.C. (1960).lııfectiol/sbo"i-Ile keratocoııjııııcti"itis.1.Eti%gy.Amer J Yet Res, 21,761-766. 5. lIorsnell,.ı.M.,Teale,C.M. (l9R7).Characterizationof the all/er membraııepmteiııaıııigensof British field iso/a-tes of Moraxellabo"is. Yet MicrobidI.15, IRI- iR9
  5. Jayappa,H.G., Lchr, C. (1986).Pathogeııiciryaııd im-mııııogeniciıyof piliatedaııd Iloııpiliaredphasesof Moraxellabo"is bı ca/ı'es.Amcr J Yet Res, 47,2217-2221
  6. Laemmli,U.K. (1970).C/eaI'Qgeofstrlu:ıııra/pmteimdu-riııg the asseıııb/yof the head of bacreriopha[?eJ4. Nature.227,6RO-685.R. Michell,P.O., Burrcll,R.G. (1964).Sera/og)'of MimaHereılagroup and the xell/ıs Moraxella.J Bacteriol,87, 900-907
  7. Ostle,A.G., Rosenbuch,R.F. (l9R6).Ol/terıııembraııeproteiııaıııigeıısof Moraxellabovis. Amer J Yet Res,.7.1419-1421
  8. Punh,G.W. Hughes,DE.(196R) Experimeııra/bOl'ilıein-fecrioııskeraıocoııjııcrivitiscGl/sedb)' suıı/ampirradiatioııaııd Moraxellabovis iııfectimı:corre/atiOlIof Iıema/)'ricabi-lity aııd pathogenicir)'.Amer J Yet Res., 29, 835-R39
  9. Punch,P.1., Slatter,D.H. (l9R4). A reı'iew ofinfecriousbOl'ilıe keralOconjuııctiviris.Yet Bull, 54,193-207
  10. Sandhu,T.S., White,F.H. (1987) lııfectiol/sbOl'iııeke-ratocoııjuctivitis.Yet Bull, 38,349-360
  11. Wilcox,G.E. (1970) Aıı exanıiııarionof Moraxellaaııd re-/ared Geııeraconımoıı/yiso/atedfrom the boviııe eye. J CompPathol, 80,65-74