Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 1999 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

The contamination and serovar distrübution of Salmonella in cattle carcasses

Sığır karkaslarında salmonella kontaminasyonu ve serotip dağılımı

Pages
25–34
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that 36 (20 %) of cattle were salmonella positive and 31 (17.2 %) were salmonella porter.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, 180 cattle were surveyed for salmonella contamination and serotype distribution at three abattoirs (A, B and C) located in Ankara and its towns.
📊
Key Findings & Data:From the cattle chosen randomly, total 900 samples-were obtained of which 540 carcass swabs taken from three different areas of each carcass, 180 mesenteric lymph nodes and 180 intestinal contents.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that 36 (20 %) of cattle were salmonella positive and 31 (17.2 %) were salmonella porter.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:900 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, 180 cattle were surveyed for salmonella contamination and serotype distribution at three abattoirs (A, B and C) located in Ankara and its towns. In abattoir A, cattle were slaughtered and dressed on the rail, in B and C on the floor. From the cattle chosen randomly, total 900 samples-were obtained of which 540 carcass swabs taken from three different areas of each carcass, 180 mesenteric lymph nodes and 180 intestinal contents. The results showed that 36 (20 %) of cattle were salmonella positive and 31 (17.2 %) were salmonella porter. Based on the sequential sampling, 9 (5 %) of carcasses, 10 (1.85 %) of carcass swabs, 12 (6.6 %) of mesenteric lymph nodes and 26 (14.4 %) of intestinal content were found salmonella positive. At the abattoirs animals slaughtered on the floor, salmonella incidence was found significantly higher (

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Ankara ili ve çevre ilçelere ait askıda (A) ve yerde (B ve O kesim yapılan 3 mezbahada kesime getirilen 180 sığır materyal olarak kullanılmıştır. Bu amaçla, sığır karkaslarının 3 ayrı bölgesinden alınan toplam 540 swap ile 180 mezenteriyal lenf yumrusu ve 180 bağırsak içeriği olmak üzere toplam 900 örnek salmonella yönünden analize alınmıştır. Analiz bulgularına göre, sığırların 36'sı (%20) salmonella pozitif, 31'i (%17.2) salmonella portör bulunmuştur. Swap örneklerinin 10'undun (% 1.85), karkasların ise 9'undan (% 5), mezenteriyal lenf yumrusu örneklerinin 12'sinden (% 6.6), bağırsak içeriği örneklerinin ise 26'sından (% 14.4) salmonella izole edilmiştir. Yerde kesim yapılan mezbahalarda (B,C) salmonella pozitif sığır oranının, askıda kesim yapılan mezbahaya A) oranla fazla olduğu saptanmıştır. Mezbahalar arası bu fark, yapılan ki-kare analizi sonucu önemli (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜPLÜLÜ, Ö. (2022). The contamination and serovar distrübution of Salmonella in cattle carcasses. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 25–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/445452

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. I. Adesiyun,A.A. Oni,O.O. (19S9) PI'I:,I'(I/elıu' (111,11111- lihio!,rclm.1 ol S(l11l1l1ıwl/(le in s/(luglııer Cil ll/I'. s/,ıughı{'r or/:'os ond ('rtlu{'ıııs in ZOl'i(l o/ııılloil' 'Vıgel'{lI.J Food Pm!. 52 (4): 232.235. 2. Alkanahl,H.A., Gasim,Z. (1993) Fooc1/ıIIı'lll' Ihw,lS{' incid{'ııc{' in ılıt' {'oSIt'1'Il /){'{)viııc{' oL Soudı Al'u/ı/(/-A /il'{, '{'(/r SUlJ7l1wn'. 19S2-1986.J Foad I'rol. 55 (I ):84- S7. 3. AI-Rajah,W.J. AI-Chalahi,K.A., Sulayman.S.D. (19S6) hıcidt'l1c{' oL s(//mIJlll:'l/11 in /"ıu/ın' 011,1 lJ71'(1i /JI'OdUclS iıı /1'([4. FoaL! Minobiol. 355-57 4. Bcan,N.H., Griflin,P.M. (199()) Foodliome c/ıwo',' ouı/ırl'llks /ll ıht' Ul1ilt'd Sı(lın. /Y73./Y87 Poı/ıngı'lls. vehicles ond ırt'nds. J f'ood I'ral. 53 (9)8()4-8 17 5. Brown,M.H.( 1982) Mt'(1I Mıc{'{)/Ji%gl' ApplıcL! Seıeııel' Publi,hcr, Ltd. Loııdoıı.pp: 14-5CJ 6. D'aousl.,I. Y. (19891 S(/l1ınıwl/(/. 327-413. LLL. MI' Doyle (Ed.): Foooborııe Haeıerial P;ııho:;cıı,,iLırecl Deekcr i IlC. NY and H;ı"cl. 7. EI-Nawawi, F., EI-Derca, H., Sayed, A. (1982) Sal. /llII/W//UV 1/1 s/ııu;;lılvr wıimıı/s. Areh i.ehensmlltelhyg. 33 (3/4)D-36 8. EI-Sherbenny, M. R., Saddik, M.F., Desouky, E.M., El-Hosany, M.M. (i 99 i) Sa/lI1011l:'llaassociall:'d wiıh mml und mn/I I'mducls. FSTA Ahsı. 23 (I): 146. 9. Erol, İ. (1999). Ankaru 'da lükeıill1l:' sUl1u/an kıy. malıırdu.11ı1/lwnelllılıırul I'arlı/ıı 1'1:' semlip daffdlll1l. Tr J of Veı Aııimal Sel. 23321-325, 10. Flowers, R.S., D'aoust,.I.Y., Andrews,W.H., Bailey,.I.S. (I 992) S,ı1monella. 371-422. In: C. Vanderzanı,ıııd D.F Splıııoes.ser (Ed.) COll1pendiııll1 of Methods for ıhe Mıcrohiological Examıııaıion of Foods, All1cncm Pııblic Health;ssocİaııon. 11 Gay,.I.M., Rice,D.H. Steiger,.J.H. (1994) PreVall:'l1Ce oL/ecu/ slll/l1li/lel/1ı slıl:'ddin;; hı' cu/I dain' caııll:' lI1arkell:'d 1I1 Washil1glon slall:'. J Food Prot. 57 (3): 195- 197 12. Grau, F.H. Brownlie,L.E. (1968) l}t'ecl olsoll1e pres. Iııu);hlvr ıreııımenıs 011ıhe salmOlıellae populaıion iıı ıhe /om'me rUlnelı wıdJllf'Ces. J Appl Baeıeriol. 3 ı: ı57- 163. 13 Guinee, P.A.M. Kampelmacher,E.H., Keulen,A., Holtra,K. (1 14. Hogue, A.T. Dreesen, D.W., Green, S.S., Ragland,R.D., James, W.O., Bergeron, KA., Cook, L.V., Pratt, M.D., Martin, D.R.( 1993) Bacıeria 011hl:'ef/Jris. kds ıınd groUlıd hel:'r COITI:'Iaıiolı wiıh s/au;.:hıer 1'0' IlimI' ııııd allll'/l1Iirtem umdeıııııaıioll. J Food Prot. 56 (2) i i ()- 113. 15.Huis in't Veld.J.H.,J., Mulder,R.W.A.W., Snijders.J.'I.A. (1994) Imp