SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2001 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

Antigenic differences among BVDV strains know under same name in different laboratories

Farklı laboratuvarlarda aynı adla kullanılan BVDV suşları arasında antijenik farklılıklar

Kadir YEŞİLBAĞ
İbrahim BURGU
Aykut ÖZKUL
Pages
7–11
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is pointed out that NADL-Ank.Lab has difference just in one epitop from NADL-Ames and NADL-Hannover, are being used in HVI, according to results of previous studies. 0712/80/Hannover-Ank.Lab gave patterns which include differences from patterns of 0712/80/Hannover (HVI) derived from the same studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, antigenic characterization results of NADL-Ank.Lab and 0712/80/Hannover-Ank.Lab strains of BVDV, which are being used in Virology Laboratory of Ankara University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, with results taken from the studies with viruses known under the same name in Virology Institute of Hannover Veterinary High School (HVI) were compared using Moab based streptoavidin-biotin-peroxidase technique.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this research, antigenic characterization results of NADL-Ank.Lab and 0712/80/Hannover-Ank.Lab strains of BVDV, which are being used in Virology Laboratory of Ankara University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, with results taken from the studies with viruses known under the same name in Virology Institute of Hannover Veterinary High School (HVI) were compared using Moab based streptoavidin-biotin-peroxidase technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is pointed out that NADL-Ank.Lab has difference just in one epitop from NADL-Ames and NADL-Hannover, are being used in HVI, according to results of previous studies. 0712/80/Hannover-Ank.Lab gave patterns which include differences from patterns of 0712/80/Hannover (HVI) derived from the same studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this research, antigenic characterization results of NADL-Ank.Lab and 0712/80/Hannover-Ank.Lab strains of BVDV, which are being used in Virology Laboratory of Ankara University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, with results taken from the studies with viruses known under the same name in Virology Institute of Hannover Veterinary High School (HVI) were compared using Moab based streptoavidin-biotin-peroxidase technique. It is pointed out that NADL-Ank.Lab has difference just in one epitop from NADL-Ames and NADL-Hannover, are being used in HVI, according to results of previous studies. 0712/80/Hannover-Ank.Lab gave patterns which include differences from patterns of 0712/80/Hannover (HVI) derived from the same studies.

Özet

Aynı adla bilinen fakat değişik laboratuvarlarda farklı pasaj geçmişine sahip o.lan virusların antijenik yapılarında farklılıklar oluşabileceği savunulmaktadır. Bu araştırmada Ankara.Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi, Viroloji Anabilim Dalı Laboratııvarında kullanılmakta olan cp BVDV NADL-Ank.lab ve ncp BVDV susu 0712/80/Hannover-Ank.Lab viruslarının 15 değişik Moab'a karşı streptoavidin-biotin-peroksidaz yöntemiyle test edilerek antijenik karakterizasyonunun yapılması ve elde edilecek bulguların daha. önce Hannover Veteriner Yüksek Okulu Viroloji Enstitüsü'nde (HVI) aynı adla kullanılan viruslarla elde edilmiş verilerle karşılaştırılarak farklılıkların saptanması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma neticesinde NADL-Ank.Lab ile HVI'daki NADL'lar (NADL-Ames ve NADL-Hannover) arasında birer epitopta farklılık olabileceği, 0712/80/Hannover-Ank.Lab ile elde edilen verilerle, HVI'da 07121 80/Hannover virusuyla yapılmış çalışmalarda elde edilmiş veriler arasında ise farklılıklar olduğu ortaya konulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

YEŞİLBAĞ, K., BURGU, İ., ÖZKUL, A. (2022). Antigenic differences among BVDV strains know under same name in different laboratories. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 7–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/445350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. ı.Baker. lC (1987):Boı'iııeI'imldiunluwuI'ims11u'ı'ıeıı'JAVMA,190,1450145S 2.Brownlie.l (1991):The, 'ııhıvuni()ihııı'()ı,'I'ııuldı-(lnhoeuI'irushiııtrpesiıııhepuıhogeııesısıı/tli.ıeu'('ArclıViraL.Suppl3, 79-96. 3,Brownlie.l, Clarke MC,Howard C. İ. (1984)Lı-perimeııwlprodW:li(}l1of/IIIUImucıısultli.'('useiiiuıııle.VetRec.114,535-536 4.Cay B,Chappuis G.Coulihaly C,Dinter Z,Edwards S.Gricser-Wilke I, Gunn M, Haye P, Hess G,Juntti N, Liess B, Matco A, McHugh P,Moennig V. Nettleton P, Wenswoort G(1989): Cıı/}/pumlll'eulı"/rslsii!11111-Ilııc/(}Iwluıııihodies(lg(liıısıpesliı.'ırusesHepııriII/Iili111-I"muıioııalwıırk.ıhop.VetMinohıol.LO,ı 23-12(). 5,Frey HR, Liess B (1971):lI"nnehrung.ıkıııeııkItııd11,'1'-weııdharkeiıeiııessıurk,.I'loı!aıogeıwlıIın-MtIlIi-russI{[/Il/ll"sfiirdiugııoslisch"Ulllersuc/lfllıg,,1ı/illitlerMık-roıilemu:,ıhod".ZenthlVetMedR,lll,61-71. 6.GilIespie JH, Baker JA,McEntee K (1960):A (rl()-paıhogeni.-.ılmiııofı'irusdiurr/ı()i:'uI'II'IIS.CorncilVel.50.73-79. 7.GilIespie JH, Bartholomew PT, Thompson.I, McEntee K (1966):T/ıeisoluıiııııofIII1I1C'lol)lfI/ıo,~"lıii./ıOl'flıeI'ir, di((rrheaI'irusFom(ourahor/edhoviıe("ıuses.CorncilVel.57. 564-571. 8. Grieser-Wilke.I, Liess B, Sehepers. I, Stahl-Hennig C,Moening V (1991):Corre/iIliolıof INJl'inevmı!diarrhoeaI'imsiııducedcVlOpaıhicet/eelswııhexpressioııof a hi-o/vpe-sl'esi/icmwka.Arch Virol. Suppl3. 55.65. 9. Harkness JW, van der Lugt. JJ (1994):BlJl'iııeViralDi-uIThoeuaııdMııcosa/Di.w-'ııse.642-650.In: lA vCoeuer.GR Thoınpson.RC Tustin(Eds).InfectiousDiseaseof Li.vestock.OxfordUniv Press. Oxford. i10.Holm-Jensen M (1991):Deıeelioıınl (JIııihodiesaKailıslho;; cho/eravirus((ııdhOl'iııeviraldiarrhoeavirusiıı por-Cllleserum.A com/}(ımlivl'e.wmiııaıilJ/1usiııı-:CI',PLA.aııd NPLAaS.ıays.Acta Vet Seand.22. 85-98.I 11 HOrzinek MC (1991): I'esliviru.ıps-/(ıwııomicpt'l'spn:live.l.Areh Virol. Suppl3. ı-5. 12. Körke J (1989):f/nslelluıı;;uııdC/ıarakıeri7uııl;mı mo-ııok/oııa/eııAliıikıııpn;;egeııdeııs/(lmmA 113ö1ô9des'IrusderBOI'ilıelıVirusDiıırrhoe.lııaugural-dissertation.TıeararztlicJıcılochshulcI-LlI1nover. 13.Mateo-Roseli AM (1988):A ıop%.~iuı!aııd(ullelioııalJ/1apol epiıopes011ıhe lIla;o/'sur/acı';.:/rc()pm/eiııo/ıhe1){)I'iııeI'im/ diarrheuI'irus(B ii/) II). Iııaııgural-disscrlaııoıı.TieararztlicheHochschuleILınnover. 14. Olafson P, Me Callum AP and Fox FH (1946)Aıı LIII-pareııı/vııewımıısmissıhlediseaseof call1e.CorneliVel.36.205-213 15. Pitoco EM (1995):U11lersuchuııgeııu!>ndıe lilııigeııe/)1-ı'ersilıı